According to this link, https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0331.html
conga, ricci and luci have updates available.
I can't find these updates on the mirrors I checked.
They are in: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/os/x86_64/CentOS/
but not in: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/updates/x86_64/RPMS/
Anyone have any ideas about this?
TIA Dave
Dave Augustus wrote:
According to this link, https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0331.html
conga, ricci and luci have updates available.
I can't find these updates on the mirrors I checked.
They are in: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/os/x86_64/CentOS/
but not in: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/updates/x86_64/RPMS/
Anyone have any ideas about this?
I am looking at this issue right now.
- KB
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Dave Augustus wrote:
According to this link, https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0331.html
conga, ricci and luci have updates available.
Well, not exactly, or at least not generally. This is in an advisory for product "RHEL Clustering (v. 5 server)":
Fromt eh advistor: "(The unlinked packages above are only available from the Red Hat Network)"
and conga-0.9.2-6.el5.src.rpm is so unlinked
==============================
I think you may wish to consider asking that the sources be released on upstream products.
-- Russ Herrold
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, R P Herrold wrote:
I think you may wish to consider asking that the sources be released on upstream products.
dang it -- I was reading too fast.
Yup this is a problem that stuff is dropping into the mirrors without advisories being seen by centos team members on non mainline products; I assume we'll have to move to some sort of daily backstol diff on mirroring with a 'find -type f' process, to pick these up.
-- Russ Herrold
R P Herrold wrote:
Yup this is a problem that stuff is dropping into the mirrors without advisories being seen by centos team members on non mainline products; I assume we'll have to move to some sort of daily backstol diff on mirroring with a 'find -type f' process, to pick these up.
Actually there is something like this running already, the 'issue' was me blocking the cluster stuff on a few bug reports in > release version stuff. Clearing it all out today.
Apologies for the delay.
- KB
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 17:57 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Actually there is something like this running already, the 'issue' was me blocking the cluster stuff on a few bug reports in > release version stuff. Clearing it all out today.
Apologies for the delay.
Does this mean that the updates will be available soon?
Not complaining here- Just asking.
(BTW- my coworkers are impressed with the level of response on this mailing list- Hats off to all!)
Dave
Dave Augustus wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 17:57 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Actually there is something like this running already, the 'issue' was me blocking the cluster stuff on a few bug reports in > release version stuff. Clearing it all out today.
Apologies for the delay.
Does this mean that the updates will be available soon?
Not complaining here- Just asking.
(BTW- my coworkers are impressed with the level of response on this mailing list- Hats off to all!)
yes, its all got released today - the packages and the release announcements should come through shortly.
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 12:51 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Dave Augustus wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 17:57 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Actually there is something like this running already, the 'issue' was me blocking the cluster stuff on a few bug reports in > release version stuff. Clearing it all out today.
Apologies for the delay.
Does this mean that the updates will be available soon?
Not complaining here- Just asking.
(BTW- my coworkers are impressed with the level of response on this mailing list- Hats off to all!)
yes, its all got released today - the packages and the release announcements should come through shortly.
Thanks much.
A contribution is forthcoming.
Dave