I am told by yum localinstall that I need this for TinyCA2.
When I search for it, it seems like it SHOULD be part of basic perl package, but it is hard to argue with yum on dependencies.....
Robert Moskowitz spake the following on 7/26/2006 1:38 PM:
I am told by yum localinstall that I need this for TinyCA2.
When I search for it, it seems like it SHOULD be part of basic perl package, but it is hard to argue with yum on dependencies.....
Does it ask just for perl-MIME-Base64, or does it ask for a version >= some number.
Scott Silva wrote:
Robert Moskowitz spake the following on 7/26/2006 1:38 PM:
I am told by yum localinstall that I need this for TinyCA2.
When I search for it, it seems like it SHOULD be part of basic perl package, but it is hard to argue with yum on dependencies.....
Does it ask just for perl-MIME-Base64, or does it ask for a version >= some number.
yum localinstall tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch.rpm Setting up Local Package Process Examining tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch.rpm: tinyca2 - 0.7.5-0.noarch Marking tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch.rpm to be installed Resolving Dependencies --> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait. ---> Package tinyca2.noarch 0:0.7.5-0 set to be updated --> Running transaction check Setting up repositories dag 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 kbs-CentOS-Extras 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 kbs-CentOS-Misc 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 jpackage-rhel 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 update 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 jpackage-generic 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 base 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 macromedia 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 contrib 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 centosplus 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 addons 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 extras 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 Reading repository metadata in from local files --> Processing Dependency: perl-MIME-Base64 for package: tinyca2 --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: perl-MIME-Base64 is needed by package tinyca2
Robert Moskowitz schrieb:
yum localinstall tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch.rpm
[ ... ]
Reading repository metadata in from local files --> Processing Dependency: perl-MIME-Base64 for package: tinyca2 --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: perl-MIME-Base64 is needed by package tinyca2
Looks like you `rpmbuild --rebuild tinyca2-0.7.5-0.src.rpm' from the project home page. The tinyca2.spec is wrong as it contains
Requires: perl perl-Gtk2 perl-MIME-Base64
At least remove "perl-MIME-Base64", I think you can remove the complete line.
Alexander
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Robert Moskowitz schrieb:
yum localinstall tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch.rpm
[ ... ]
Reading repository metadata in from local files --> Processing Dependency: perl-MIME-Base64 for package: tinyca2 --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Missing Dependency: perl-MIME-Base64 is needed by package tinyca2
Looks like you `rpmbuild --rebuild tinyca2-0.7.5-0.src.rpm' from the project home page. The tinyca2.spec is wrong as it contains
Actually I downloaded the rpm on the site, as it stated that it 'should' work with most distributions.... =-O
Requires: perl perl-Gtk2 perl-MIME-Base64
At least remove "perl-MIME-Base64", I think you can remove the complete line.
So get the source and do my own build. I am starting to get the hang of doing that...
Robert Moskowitz schrieb:
I am told by yum localinstall that I need this for TinyCA2.
When I search for it, it seems like it SHOULD be part of basic perl package, but it is hard to argue with yum on dependencies.....
The .spec file shouldn't explicitly have a "Requires: perl-MIME-Base64". The automatic dependencies check at rpmbuild time should automatically generate a requirement for perl(MIME-Base64), which is fulfilled by the Perl main package.
$ rpm -q --whatprovides 'perl(MIME::Base64)' perl-5.8.5-24.RHEL4.x86_64
Alexander
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Robert Moskowitz schrieb:
I am told by yum localinstall that I need this for TinyCA2.
When I search for it, it seems like it SHOULD be part of basic perl package, but it is hard to argue with yum on dependencies.....
The .spec file shouldn't explicitly have a "Requires: perl-MIME-Base64". The automatic dependencies check at rpmbuild time should automatically generate a requirement for perl(MIME-Base64), which is fulfilled by the Perl main package.
$ rpm -q --whatprovides 'perl(MIME::Base64)' perl-5.8.5-24.RHEL4.x86_64
rpm -ihv tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: perl-MIME-Base64 is needed by tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch
Robert Moskowitz spake the following on 7/26/2006 2:36 PM:
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Robert Moskowitz schrieb:
I am told by yum localinstall that I need this for TinyCA2.
When I search for it, it seems like it SHOULD be part of basic perl package, but it is hard to argue with yum on dependencies.....
The .spec file shouldn't explicitly have a "Requires: perl-MIME-Base64". The automatic dependencies check at rpmbuild time should automatically generate a requirement for perl(MIME-Base64), which is fulfilled by the Perl main package.
$ rpm -q --whatprovides 'perl(MIME::Base64)' perl-5.8.5-24.RHEL4.x86_64
rpm -ihv tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: perl-MIME-Base64 is needed by tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch
Is that the SUSE rpm from http://tinyca.sm-zone.net/? Maybe if you get the src rpm and rebuild it.
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Scott Silva Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 6:46 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Re: Finding perl-MIME-Base64
Robert Moskowitz spake the following on 7/26/2006 2:36 PM:
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Robert Moskowitz schrieb:
I am told by yum localinstall that I need this for TinyCA2.
When I search for it, it seems like it SHOULD be part of
basic perl
package, but it is hard to argue with yum on dependencies.....
The .spec file shouldn't explicitly have a "Requires: perl-MIME-Base64". The automatic dependencies check at
rpmbuild time
should automatically generate a requirement for perl(MIME-Base64), which is fulfilled by the Perl main package.
$ rpm -q --whatprovides 'perl(MIME::Base64)' perl-5.8.5-24.RHEL4.x86_64
rpm -ihv tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: perl-MIME-Base64 is needed by tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch
Is that the SUSE rpm from http://tinyca.sm-zone.net/? Maybe if you get the src rpm and rebuild it.
I have looked for this package as well. I believe it is included in the mailscanner rpm package. You maybe able to extract it from that package.
Eddie
Thomas E Dukes spake the following on 7/26/2006 4:01 PM:
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Scott Silva Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 6:46 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Re: Finding perl-MIME-Base64
Robert Moskowitz spake the following on 7/26/2006 2:36 PM:
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Robert Moskowitz schrieb:
I am told by yum localinstall that I need this for TinyCA2.
When I search for it, it seems like it SHOULD be part of
basic perl
package, but it is hard to argue with yum on dependencies.....
The .spec file shouldn't explicitly have a "Requires: perl-MIME-Base64". The automatic dependencies check at
rpmbuild time
should automatically generate a requirement for perl(MIME-Base64), which is fulfilled by the Perl main package.
$ rpm -q --whatprovides 'perl(MIME::Base64)' perl-5.8.5-24.RHEL4.x86_64
rpm -ihv tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: perl-MIME-Base64 is needed by tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch
Is that the SUSE rpm from http://tinyca.sm-zone.net/? Maybe if you get the src rpm and rebuild it.
I have looked for this package as well. I believe it is included in the mailscanner rpm package. You maybe able to extract it from that package.
Eddie
I meant the actual tinyca rpm. On their website they have a binary built for SUSE 9.3 and a source rpm. I looked at the source rpm, and the .spec file does list that dependancy. Maybe SUSE had perl-MIME-Base64 separate. Either way, one could download the source rpm and install it, edit the .spec to remove that dependancy, and "rpm -ba specfile" it again and test it.
Scott Silva spake the following on 7/26/2006 4:26 PM:
Thomas E Dukes spake the following on 7/26/2006 4:01 PM:
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Scott Silva Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 6:46 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Re: Finding perl-MIME-Base64
Robert Moskowitz spake the following on 7/26/2006 2:36 PM:
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Robert Moskowitz schrieb:
I am told by yum localinstall that I need this for TinyCA2.
When I search for it, it seems like it SHOULD be part of
basic perl
package, but it is hard to argue with yum on dependencies.....
The .spec file shouldn't explicitly have a "Requires: perl-MIME-Base64". The automatic dependencies check at
rpmbuild time
should automatically generate a requirement for perl(MIME-Base64), which is fulfilled by the Perl main package.
$ rpm -q --whatprovides 'perl(MIME::Base64)' perl-5.8.5-24.RHEL4.x86_64
rpm -ihv tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: perl-MIME-Base64 is needed by tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch
Is that the SUSE rpm from http://tinyca.sm-zone.net/? Maybe if you get the src rpm and rebuild it.
I have looked for this package as well. I believe it is included in the mailscanner rpm package. You maybe able to extract it from that package.
Eddie
I meant the actual tinyca rpm. On their website they have a binary built for SUSE 9.3 and a source rpm. I looked at the source rpm, and the .spec file does list that dependancy. Maybe SUSE had perl-MIME-Base64 separate. Either way, one could download the source rpm and install it, edit the .spec to remove that dependancy, and "rpm -ba specfile" it again and test it.
This looks like the easiest way; Dag Wieers has this already done on his site. You could either add the rpmforge repo and yum install tinyca2, or you could download the rpms you need from his site.
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Scott Silva Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 7:40 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Re: Finding perl-MIME-Base64
Scott Silva spake the following on 7/26/2006 4:26 PM:
Thomas E Dukes spake the following on 7/26/2006 4:01 PM:
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Scott Silva Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 6:46 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Re: Finding perl-MIME-Base64
Robert Moskowitz spake the following on 7/26/2006 2:36 PM:
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Robert Moskowitz schrieb:
> I am told by yum localinstall that I need this for TinyCA2. > > When I search for it, it seems like it SHOULD be part of
basic perl
> package, but it is hard to argue with yum on dependencies..... The .spec file shouldn't explicitly have a "Requires: perl-MIME-Base64". The automatic dependencies check at
rpmbuild time
should automatically generate a requirement for
perl(MIME-Base64),
which is fulfilled by the Perl main package.
$ rpm -q --whatprovides 'perl(MIME::Base64)' perl-5.8.5-24.RHEL4.x86_64
rpm -ihv tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: perl-MIME-Base64 is needed by tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch
Is that the SUSE rpm from http://tinyca.sm-zone.net/? Maybe if you get the src rpm and rebuild it.
I have looked for this package as well. I believe it is
included in
the mailscanner rpm package. You maybe able to extract it
from that package.
Eddie
I meant the actual tinyca rpm. On their website they have a binary built for SUSE 9.3 and a source rpm. I looked at the source rpm, and the .spec file does list
that dependancy.
Maybe SUSE had perl-MIME-Base64 separate. Either way, one could download the source rpm and install
it, edit the
.spec to remove that dependancy, and "rpm -ba specfile" it
again and test it.
This looks like the easiest way; Dag Wieers has this already done on his site. You could either add the rpmforge repo and yum install tinyca2, or you could download the rpms you need from his site.
Or, you could install the per module from cpan.org
Eddie
Thomas E Dukes wrote:
Dag Wieers has this already done on his site. You could either add the rpmforge repo and yum install tinyca2, or you could download the rpms you need from his site.
Or, you could install the per module from cpan.org
how will that allow rpm to satisfy depends ?
Scott Silva wrote:
Scott Silva spake the following on 7/26/2006 4:26 PM:
Thomas E Dukes spake the following on 7/26/2006 4:01 PM:
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Scott Silva Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 6:46 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Re: Finding perl-MIME-Base64
Robert Moskowitz spake the following on 7/26/2006 2:36 PM:
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Robert Moskowitz schrieb:
> I am told by yum localinstall that I need this for TinyCA2. > > When I search for it, it seems like it SHOULD be part of >
basic perl
> package, but it is hard to argue with yum on dependencies..... > The .spec file shouldn't explicitly have a "Requires: perl-MIME-Base64". The automatic dependencies check at
rpmbuild time
should automatically generate a requirement for perl(MIME-Base64), which is fulfilled by the Perl main package.
$ rpm -q --whatprovides 'perl(MIME::Base64)' perl-5.8.5-24.RHEL4.x86_64
rpm -ihv tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: perl-MIME-Base64 is needed by tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch
Is that the SUSE rpm from http://tinyca.sm-zone.net/? Maybe if you get the src rpm and rebuild it.
I have looked for this package as well. I believe it is included in the mailscanner rpm package. You maybe able to extract it from that package.
Eddie
I meant the actual tinyca rpm. On their website they have a binary built for SUSE 9.3 and a source rpm. I looked at the source rpm, and the .spec file does list that dependancy. Maybe SUSE had perl-MIME-Base64 separate. Either way, one could download the source rpm and install it, edit the .spec to remove that dependancy, and "rpm -ba specfile" it again and test it.
This looks like the easiest way; Dag Wieers has this already done on his site. You could either add the rpmforge repo and yum install tinyca2, or you could download the rpms you need from his site.
Oh, I missed a repo from DAG????
Well off I go looking for it and adding it.
Scott Silva wrote:
Robert Moskowitz spake the following on 7/26/2006 2:36 PM:
Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Robert Moskowitz schrieb:
I am told by yum localinstall that I need this for TinyCA2.
When I search for it, it seems like it SHOULD be part of basic perl package, but it is hard to argue with yum on dependencies.....
The .spec file shouldn't explicitly have a "Requires: perl-MIME-Base64". The automatic dependencies check at rpmbuild time should automatically generate a requirement for perl(MIME-Base64), which is fulfilled by the Perl main package.
$ rpm -q --whatprovides 'perl(MIME::Base64)' perl-5.8.5-24.RHEL4.x86_64
rpm -ihv tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: perl-MIME-Base64 is needed by tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch
Is that the SUSE rpm from http://tinyca.sm-zone.net/? Maybe if you get the src rpm and rebuild it.
It is the SUSE rpm, but there is the claim it SHOULD work with current distributions.
But looking at the site again, I see that I should NOT have read it 1am last night. As re-reading it I DO get the understanding that they mean the current distributions of SUSE, not just current distributions...
Oh, well. :-[
Robert Moskowitz napsal(a):
rpm -ihv tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: perl-MIME-Base64 is needed by tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch
As someone mentioned before perl-MIME-Base64 is in perl-5.8.5-34.RHEL4. I do not use Dag version of Tinyca2, is outdated and not UTF8. Go this way: rpm -Uhv http://tinyca.sm-zone.net/tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch.rpm --nodeps It works. David Hrbáč
David Hrbáč wrote:
As someone mentioned before perl-MIME-Base64 is in perl-5.8.5-34.RHEL4. I do not use Dag version of Tinyca2, is outdated and not UTF8. Go this way: rpm -Uhv http://tinyca.sm-zone.net/tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch.rpm --nodeps
^^^^^^^^
ARGH.
It works.
I'd rather see "best practice" tips on this mailing list, not worst practice.
Just remove the dependency to perl-Mime-Base64 from the .spec file and rebuild the src rpm.
Ralph
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
David Hrbác( wrote:
As someone mentioned before perl-MIME-Base64 is in perl-5.8.5-34.RHEL4. I do not use Dag version of Tinyca2, is outdated and not UTF8. Go this way: rpm -Uhv http://tinyca.sm-zone.net/tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch.rpm --nodeps
^^^^^^^^ARGH.
It looked 'enticing', but as I read it, I was concerned that I would not have the skills to diagnose problems that this might cause.
It works.
I'd rather see "best practice" tips on this mailing list, not worst practice.
Just remove the dependency to perl-Mime-Base64 from the .spec file and rebuild the src rpm.
I plan on doing that today after staff conference call (or maybe during it ;-) ).
David Hrbáč spake the following on 7/27/2006 1:18 AM:
Robert Moskowitz napsal(a):
rpm -ihv tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch.rpm error: Failed dependencies: perl-MIME-Base64 is needed by tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch
As someone mentioned before perl-MIME-Base64 is in perl-5.8.5-34.RHEL4. I do not use Dag version of Tinyca2, is outdated and not UTF8. Go this way: rpm -Uhv http://tinyca.sm-zone.net/tinyca2-0.7.5-0.noarch.rpm --nodeps It works. David Hrbáč
Dag seems to have the same version. He just seems to have fixed his .spec file to fit better with RedHat.
Just to let everyone know,
I took the 'short cut'. I used the TinyCA2 that was on DAGs repo.
It installed, pulling quite a number of perl stuff with it.
It is running, as so far I have created my first root cert.
Problem I have is I **WORK** on the PKIX workgroup in the IETF and contributed to the Fed PKI and the new BioPharma SAFE PKI.
So now that I can cut loose creating certs, I am busy overthinking all I can do with them.
Sheesh, get a life! :-P
David Hrbáč napsal(a):
Well Dag has finally updated the package on 27th. So my advice is really depreciated. :o) David Hrbac
Hmmm, I guess, I must say rpm --nodeps is not depreciated, Dag has updated the package, but it's not OK. Dag please update your .spec to include tinyca2.desktop from upstream http://tinyca.dyndns.org/cvs-bin/viewcvs.cgi/tinyca2.desktop?cvsroot=TinyCA2 Your desktop file is only English and not even working, links to tinyca... Thanks, David Hrbac
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, David Hrbá? wrote:
David Hrbá? napsal(a):
Well Dag has finally updated the package on 27th. So my advice is really depreciated. :o) David Hrbac
Hmmm, I guess, I must say rpm --nodeps is not depreciated, Dag has updated the package, but it's not OK. Dag please update your .spec to include tinyca2.desktop from upstream http://tinyca.dyndns.org/cvs-bin/viewcvs.cgi/tinyca2.desktop?cvsroot=TinyCA2 Your desktop file is only English and not even working, links to tinyca...
If you're talking to me, please then include me in the conversation. It's a coincidence I read this mail. Being subscribed does not mean I read every single mail.
You're implying that I was already notified of the problem, which I was not. I just updated the package when a new release was made.
My desktop file is there because tinyca did not include a desktop file when it was added. That's why it is English only (I do not provide translation services). If it linked to tinyca instead, people did not notify me. That's right I do not use tinyca myself (I have used it though) so problems inside a package may go unnoticed if nobody informs me.
PS I noticed that a lot of RPMforge users are using this mailinglist to report problems about RPMforge RPM packages. Please send them to the proper RPMforge mailinglist. (users@lists.rpmforge.net or suggest@lists.rpmforge.net)
Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
Dag Wieers wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, David Hrbá? wrote:
David Hrbá? napsal(a):
Well Dag has finally updated the package on 27th. So my advice is really depreciated. :o)
Hmmm, I guess, I must say rpm --nodeps is not depreciated, Dag has updated the package, but it's not OK. Dag please update your .spec to include tinyca2.desktop from upstream http://tinyca.dyndns.org/cvs-bin/viewcvs.cgi/tinyca2.desktop?cvsroot=TinyCA2 Your desktop file is only English and not even working, links to tinyca...
If you're talking to me, please then include me in the conversation. It's a coincidence I read this mail. Being subscribed does not mean I read every single mail.
Those that do are rather amazing.
You're implying that I was already notified of the problem, which I was not. I just updated the package when a new release was made.
And thank you!
My desktop file is there because tinyca did not include a desktop file when it was added. That's why it is English only (I do not provide translation services). If it linked to tinyca instead, people did not notify me. That's right I do not use tinyca myself (I have used it though)
Know of any other CA out there to try?
so problems inside a package may go unnoticed if nobody informs me.
PS I noticed that a lot of RPMforge users are using this mailinglist to report problems about RPMforge RPM packages. Please send them to the proper RPMforge mailinglist. (users@lists.rpmforge.net or suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
Not another list to follow! :-P
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Dag Wieers wrote:
My desktop file is there because tinyca did not include a desktop file when it was added. That's why it is English only (I do not provide translation services). If it linked to tinyca instead, people did not notify me. That's right I do not use tinyca myself (I have used it though)
Know of any other CA out there to try?
Not really, but if you do let me know :)
so problems inside a package may go unnoticed if nobody informs me.
PS I noticed that a lot of RPMforge users are using this mailinglist to report problems about RPMforge RPM packages. Please send them to the proper RPMforge mailinglist. (users@lists.rpmforge.net or suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
Not another list to follow! :-P
Let's say you do not have to follow it actively. If you have problems you can search the archive or bring it up there. I don't mind if people discuss the software itself here (or on the upstream mailinglist) but if you noticed a problem, the only true way to have it fixed is to let us know.
But yes, you do have to be subscribed to be able to post. :/
Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag@wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Dag Wieers wrote:
PS I noticed that a lot of RPMforge users are using this mailinglist to report problems about RPMforge RPM packages. Please send them to the proper RPMforge mailinglist. (users@lists.rpmforge.net or suggest@lists.rpmforge.net
Not another list to follow! :-P
As everyone is posting their stuff here, users@lists.rpmforge.net is *very* low traffic. I didn't even make a mail folder for it :)
Ralph
David Hrbáč wrote:
David Hrbáč napsal(a):
Well Dag has finally updated the package on 27th. So my advice is really depreciated. :o)
Hmmm, I guess, I must say rpm --nodeps is not depreciated, Dag has updated the package, but it's not OK. Dag please update your .spec to include tinyca2.desktop from upstream http://tinyca.dyndns.org/cvs-bin/viewcvs.cgi/tinyca2.desktop?cvsroot=TinyCA2 Your desktop file is only English and not even working, links to tinyca...
I do not understand what you are getting at here, works for me. But I suspect that only the english version is working from what I got from the DAG repo? Well, given my dyslexia, I don't have a problem with that; I am extremely mono-linguistic, and even english was a struggle for me :-[
David Hrba'c( wrote:
Scott Silva napsal(a):
Dag seems to have the same version. He just seems to have fixed his .spec file to fit better with RedHat.
Well Dag has finally updated the package on 27th. So my advice is really depreciated. :o)
After I did all the perl-Glib and perl-Gtk2 from Karanbir's repo (Thanks Karanbir for fixing the version problem with them!), I then picked up that the DAG repo had TinyCA2, so I yum installed from there and have been off and running.
For all I know about X.509 (quite a lot, really [IETF PKIX, FPKI, SAFE, etc.], but all theory), it is quite an eye-opener to actually work through setting up a decent PKI. I suspect this is NOT the list to share views about how to set up your very own PKI for all of your servers,,,,
I have already sent a number of messages to the author.
-
Alexander Dalloz -
Dag Wieers -
David Hrbáč -
Karanbir Singh -
Ralph Angenendt -
Robert Moskowitz -
Scott Silva -
Thomas E Dukes