Since the latest update (may wrap here), xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015 04:16:01 PM EDT xorg-x11-server-common-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015 04:15:58 PM EDT x264-0.0.0-0.4.20101111.el6.rf.x86_64 Wed 19 Nov 2014 04:56:05 PM EST xvidcore-1.2.2-1.el6.rf.x86_64 Wed 19 Nov 2014 04:55:49 PM EST . . . drop a lot of older stable stuff ...
Xorg is competing heavily with FF for top hog on my system. In FF I understand because I had multiple windows (6 desktops) with many tabs. I know this would theoretically increase Xorg work as well but prior to this update I seldom saw it near the top of "top"
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 4055 hardtolo 20 0 2165m 945m 49m R 95.9 12.0 3724:26 firefox 3119 root 20 0 276m 121m 34m S 34.0 1.6 2228:58 Xorg 15645 hardtolo 20 0 6163m 350m 26m S 10.6 4.5 181:50.51 java 5663 hardtolo 20 0 1557m 202m 24m S 9.6 2.6 294:53.69 plugin-containe 27871 hardtolo 20 0 1957m 520m 88m S 7.6 6.6 456:54.44 soffice.bin 18245 hardtolo 20 0 6228m 356m 26m S 7.3 4.5 112:09.55 java 14349 hardtolo 20 0 6228m 345m 26m S 5.3 4.4 143:59.97 java 9164 root 20 0 197m 51m 12m S 3.3 0.7 14:14.06 Xorg 4152 hardtolo 20 0 915m 28m 20m S 1.7 0.4 182:27.00 knotify4 27 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 1.0 0.0 28:58.96 events/0 12581 wild-bil 20 0 302m 14m 9.9m S 1.0 0.2 0:02.43 gnome-terminal 26741 hardtolo 20 0 15300 1420 892 S 1.0 0.0 0:02.47 top
Anyone else pound the crap out of a desktop with FF and see Xorg getting "fat"?
TIA for any clues or response.
Bill
On 06/27/15 17:05, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
Since the latest update (may wrap here), xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015 04:16:01 PM EDT xorg-x11-server-common-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015 04:15:58 PM EDT x264-0.0.0-0.4.20101111.el6.rf.x86_64 Wed 19 Nov 2014 04:56:05 PM EST xvidcore-1.2.2-1.el6.rf.x86_64 Wed 19 Nov 2014 04:55:49 PM EST . . . drop a lot of older stable stuff ...
Xorg is competing heavily with FF for top hog on my system. In FF I understand because I had multiple windows (6 desktops) with many tabs. I know this would theoretically increase Xorg work as well but prior to this update I seldom saw it near the top of "top"
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 4055 hardtolo 20 0 2165m 945m 49m R 95.9 12.0 3724:26 firefox 3119 root 20 0 276m 121m 34m S 34.0 1.6 2228:58 Xorg 15645 hardtolo 20 0 6163m 350m 26m S 10.6 4.5 181:50.51 java 5663 hardtolo 20 0 1557m 202m 24m S 9.6 2.6 294:53.69 plugin-containe 27871 hardtolo 20 0 1957m 520m 88m S 7.6 6.6 456:54.44 soffice.bin 18245 hardtolo 20 0 6228m 356m 26m S 7.3 4.5 112:09.55 java 14349 hardtolo 20 0 6228m 345m 26m S 5.3 4.4 143:59.97 java 9164 root 20 0 197m 51m 12m S 3.3 0.7 14:14.06 Xorg 4152 hardtolo 20 0 915m 28m 20m S 1.7 0.4 182:27.00 knotify4 27 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 1.0 0.0 28:58.96 events/0 12581 wild-bil 20 0 302m 14m 9.9m S 1.0 0.2 0:02.43 gnome-terminal 26741 hardtolo 20 0 15300 1420 892 S 1.0 0.0 0:02.47 top
Anyone else pound the crap out of a desktop with FF and see Xorg getting "fat"?
TIA for any clues or response.
Bill
Here's what I see with three FF sessions running at the same time:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2631 fahclien 39 19 832m 530m 3012 S 637.9 1.7 311:40.44 FahCore_a4
4236 mlapier 20 0 2530m 1.4g 42m R 83.7 4.6 2:50.27 firefox
2823 root 20 0 163m 42m 17m S 19.9 0.1 1:31.18 Xorg
3429 mlapier 20 0 625m 158m 39m S 2.3 0.5 1:06.08 skype
On Sat, 2015-06-27 at 21:17 -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 06/27/15 17:05, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
Since the latest update (may wrap here), xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015 04:16:01 PM EDT xorg-x11-server-common-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015 04:15:58 PM EDT <snip
Xorg is competing heavily with FF for top hog on my system. In FF I understand because I had multiple windows (6 desktops) with many tabs. I know this would theoretically increase Xorg work as well but prior to this update I seldom saw it near the top of "top"
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 4055 hardtolo 20 0 2165m 945m 49m R 95.9 12.0 3724:26 firefox 3119 root 20 0 276m 121m 34m S 34.0 1.6 2228:58 Xorg 15645 hardtolo 20 0 6163m 350m 26m S 10.6 4.5 181:50.51 java 5663 hardtolo 20 0 1557m 202m 24m S 9.6 2.6 294:53.69 plugin-containe
<snip>
Anyone else pound the crap out of a desktop with FF and see Xorg getting "fat"?
TIA for any clues or response.
Bill
Here's what I see with three FF sessions running at the same time:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2631 fahclien 39 19 832m 530m 3012 S 637.9 1.7 311:40.44 FahCore_a4
4236 mlapier 20 0 2530m 1.4g 42m R 83.7 4.6 2:50.27 firefox
2823 root 20 0 163m 42m 17m S 19.9 0.1 1:31.18 Xorg
3429 mlapier 20 0 625m 158m 39m S 2.3 0.5 1:06.08 skype
Thanks Mark.
Do you happen to know (recall?) if this is more or less in-line with what went on before the latest Xorg fix?
I may not be doing too badly. I also run 3 users in three X sessions. Two have six desktops and one has two desktops. The last is my "idle" user, never doing anything, that sits on tty1 so I can have my active users like they were before the CentOS 6.6 upgrade - the first X session used to come on tty7 and did not screw up when switching run levels to/from 3 and 5 (bug open on CentOS, but I suspect not passed upstream?).
This is on my home-built box on an MSI 760GM-P23FX MB, SATA.
From lspci -v, some things that may affect me?
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Cedar [Radeon HD 5000/6000/7350/8350 Series] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Diamond Multimedia Systems Device 5450 Kernel driver in use: radeon Kernel modules: radeon CPU stuff, 6 cores: processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 16 model : 10 model name : AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1035T Processor stepping : 0 cpu MHz : 800.000 cache size : 512 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 6 core id : 0 cpu cores : 6 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 6 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good nonstop_tsc extd_apicid aperfmperf pni monitor cx16 popcnt lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs skinit wdt nodeid_msr cpb npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save pausefilter bogomips : 5200.20
Memory: $ free (may wrap) total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 8057968 2675424 5382544 12192 104652 1149796 -/+ buffers/cache: 1420976 6636992 Swap: 14352376 0 14352376
Do you/anyone think my Xorg CPU usage looks reasonable all things considered or should I be looking for some "tweaks"?
TIA, Bill
On Sat, 2015-06-27 at 21:17 -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 06/27/15 17:05, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
Since the latest update (may wrap here), xorg-x11-server-Xorg-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015 04:16:01 PM EDT xorg-x11-server-common-1.15.0-26.el6.centos.0.1.x86_64 Sat 20 Jun 2015 04:15:58 PM EDT
<snip>
Xorg is competing heavily with FF for top hog on my system. In FF I understand because I had multiple windows (6 desktops) with many tabs. I know this would theoretically increase Xorg work as well but prior to this update I seldom saw it near the top of "top"
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 4055 hardtolo 20 0 2165m 945m 49m R 95.9 12.0 3724:26 firefox 3119 root 20 0 276m 121m 34m S 34.0 1.6 2228:58 Xorg 15645 hardtolo 20 0 6163m 350m 26m S 10.6 4.5 181:50.51 java
<snip>
Anyone else pound the crap out of a desktop with FF and see Xorg getting "fat"?
TIA for any clues or response.
Bill
Here's what I see with three FF sessions running at the same time:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
2631 fahclien 39 19 832m 530m 3012 S 637.9 1.7 311:40.44 FahCore_a4
4236 mlapier 20 0 2530m 1.4g 42m R 83.7 4.6 2:50.27 firefox
2823 root 20 0 163m 42m 17m S 19.9 0.1 1:31.18 Xorg
3429 mlapier 20 0 625m 158m 39m S 2.3 0.5 1:06.08 skype
Follow-up from my previous post, which as others have noted Goodle is kind enoungh to not let me conveniently see ...
I had forgotten that the longer FF runs in my setup the more CPU it tends to use. And I assume this feeds through to demand on Xorg.
I stopped FF, restarted and now see very reasonable numbers for it and Xorg, which no longer sits so high up in CPU usage.
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 7815 hardtolo 20 0 1590m 563m 45m S 8.9 7.2 14:42.16 firefox 8711 hardtolo 20 0 786m 91m 21m S 2.3 1.2 7:16.57 plugin-containe 9409 wild-bil 20 0 15272 1400 888 R 0.7 0.0 0:00.55 top 1867 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.3 0.0 0:09.25 kondemand/0 1868 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0.3 0.0 0:06.48 kondemand/1 2195 root 20 0 22516 1084 916 S 0.3 0.0 0:12.73 hald-addon-stor 6890 TempTemp 20 0 264m 12m 4712 S 0.3 0.2 0:01.35 gnome-screensav 7315 hardtolo 20 0 540m 15m 10m S 0.3 0.2 0:13.58 clock-applet 7919 root 20 0 197m 50m 11m S 0.3 0.6 0:38.11 Xorg 8043 wild-bil 20 0 494m 10m 7884 S 0.3 0.1 0:01.35 gnome-settings- 8096 wild-bil 20 0 540m 13m 10m S 0.3 0.2 0:13.41 clock-applet
Thanks for passing on the reply, which eventually logged my memory.
Bill
-
Bill Maltby (C4B) -
Mark LaPierre