From: Ugo Bellavance ugob@camo-route.com
What does that mean... I can't really connect it to my original post.
Sorry, I meant "list" instead of "last."
As always, I believe in a meritocracy. And that means those who are on the project have final say. And those who don't should respect their wishes.
With that said, I am not on the project, so I would respect what the project maintainers say.
-- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org
Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith@ieee.org wrote:
From: Ugo Bellavance ugob@camo-route.com
What does that mean... I can't really connect it to my original post.
Sorry, I meant "list" instead of "last."
As always, I believe in a meritocracy. And that means those who are on the project have final say. And those who don't should respect their wishes.
With that said, I am not on the project, so I would respect what the project maintainers say.
Would you agree on creating another list?
-- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Ugo Bellavance wrote:
Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith@ieee.org wrote:
From: Ugo Bellavance ugob@camo-route.com
What does that mean... I can't really connect it to my original post.
Sorry, I meant "list" instead of "last."
As always, I believe in a meritocracy. And that means those who are on the project have final say. And those who don't should respect their wishes.
With that said, I am not on the project, so I would respect what the project maintainers say.
Would you agree on creating another list?
I do not agree with creating more lists. If people do not want to foillow the discussions then they can bitbucket individual(s) concerned.
I dont think traffic would move to a separate list anyway.
Regards Lance