On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.reindl@thelounge.net wrote:
redistribution of SOURCE. have you READ the GPL ?
Please quote the section that you think exempts binaries
*THE WHOLE GPL TALKS ABOUT SOURCE CODE DAMNED* *THE WHOLE GPL TALKS ABOUT SOURCE CODE DAMNED* *THE WHOLE GPL TALKS ABOUT SOURCE CODE DAMNED*
Sorry, but that quote does not appear in any copy of the GPL that I can find. And it's not true, either. Everything it says is about 'works as a whole' and anything that can be considered a copy or derivative work under copyright law.
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikesell@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald h.reindl@thelounge.net wrote:
redistribution of SOURCE. have you READ the GPL ?
Please quote the section that you think exempts binaries
*THE WHOLE GPL TALKS ABOUT SOURCE CODE DAMNED* *THE WHOLE GPL TALKS ABOUT SOURCE CODE DAMNED* *THE WHOLE GPL TALKS ABOUT SOURCE CODE DAMNED*
Sorry, but that quote does not appear in any copy of the GPL that I can find. And it's not true, either. Everything it says is about 'works as a whole' and anything that can be considered a copy or derivative work under copyright law.
<snip>
Copyright law != Trademark law.
-
Andrew Wyatt -
Les Mikesell