CentOS 5.7 x86_64. Lots of hosts NFS mounting a file system. All are configured identically (same LDAP servers, same DNS, same autofs config, same patches, etc). On some of them I see an NFS mount displaying a host name:
% df -P | grep smt <hostname>:/mnt/foo 1651345888 264620688 1386725200 17% /fs/home/smt
and on some just the IP address:
% df -P | grep smt aa.bb.cc.dd:/mnt/foo 1651345888 264620688 1386725200 17% /fs/home/smt
I cannot see any difference between the configuration of these two clients. Everything works. Anyone have a clue as to the source of this difference?
-steve
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Steve Thompson smt@vgersoft.com wrote:
CentOS 5.7 x86_64. Lots of hosts NFS mounting a file system. All are configured identically (same LDAP servers, same DNS, same autofs config, same patches, etc). On some of them I see an NFS mount displaying a host name:
% df -P | grep smt <hostname>:/mnt/foo 1651345888 264620688 1386725200 17% /fs/home/smt
and on some just the IP address:
% df -P | grep smt aa.bb.cc.dd:/mnt/foo 1651345888 264620688 1386725200 17% /fs/home/smt
I cannot see any difference between the configuration of these two clients. Everything works. Anyone have a clue as to the source of this difference?
Yes. The version of autofs must be different. It's a known issue and has been resolved in later versions of autofs. Please see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725536
Akemi
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:33:42 -0800 Akemi Yagi wrote:
Yes. The version of autofs must be different. It's a known issue and has been resolved in later versions of autofs. Please see:
You are not authorized to access bug #725536. To see this bug, you must first log in to an account with the appropriate permissions.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Frank Cox theatre@sasktel.net wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:33:42 -0800 Akemi Yagi wrote:
Yes. The version of autofs must be different. It's a known issue and has been resolved in later versions of autofs. Please see:
You are not authorized to access bug #725536. To see this bug, you must first log in to an account with the appropriate permissions.
How about this one?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735935
and
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1318.html
Akemi
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:31:06 -0800 Akemi Yagi wrote:
How about this one? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735935 and http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1318.html
Those are public and readable.