Does anyone know what's up with:
Error: Package: marco-1.8.3-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) Requires: libgtop-2.0.so.10()(64bit)
Isn't the EPEL package built against stock Centos?
------------ Original Message ------------
Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:05:16 -0500 From: Les Mikesell lesmikesell@gmail.com To: CentOS centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency?
Does anyone know what's up with:
Error: Package: marco-1.8.3-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) Requires: libgtop-2.0.so.10()(64bit)
Isn't the EPEL package built against stock Centos?
Check epel-testing, that's where it (still) was a few days ago I believe. [I don't have my C7 laptop on so can't confirm things quickly.]
- Richard
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Richard lists-centos@listmail.innovate.net wrote:
Does anyone know what's up with:
Error: Package: marco-1.8.3-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) Requires: libgtop-2.0.so.10()(64bit)
Isn't the EPEL package built against stock Centos?
Check epel-testing, that's where it (still) was a few days ago I believe. [I don't have my C7 laptop on so can't confirm things quickly.]
Thanks, but it doesn't help to --enablerepo=epel-testing. The libgtop2 package should be from the base repo anyway.
------------ Original Message ------------
Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:18:45 -0500 From: Les Mikesell lesmikesell@gmail.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Cc: Subject: Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Richard lists-centos@listmail.innovate.net wrote:
Does anyone know what's up with:
Error: Package: marco-1.8.3-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) Requires: libgtop-2.0.so.10()(64bit)
Isn't the EPEL package built against stock Centos?
Check epel-testing, that's where it (still) was a few days ago I believe. [I don't have my C7 laptop on so can't confirm things quickly.]
Thanks, but it doesn't help to --enablerepo=epel-testing. The libgtop2 package should be from the base repo anyway.
Sorry, just checked. It looks to be in "cr".
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Richard lists-centos@listmail.innovate.net wrote:
------------ Original Message ------------
Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:18:45 -0500 From: Les Mikesell lesmikesell@gmail.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Cc: Subject: Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Richard lists-centos@listmail.innovate.net wrote:
Does anyone know what's up with:
Error: Package: marco-1.8.3-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) Requires: libgtop-2.0.so.10()(64bit)
Isn't the EPEL package built against stock Centos?
Check epel-testing, that's where it (still) was a few days ago I believe. [I don't have my C7 laptop on so can't confirm things quickly.]
Thanks, but it doesn't help to --enablerepo=epel-testing. The libgtop2 package should be from the base repo anyway.
Sorry, just checked. It looks to be in "cr".
So... the right thing to do for someone who just wants to update a system today would be???
------------ Original Message ------------
Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:32:12 -0500 From: Les Mikesell lesmikesell@gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Richard lists-centos@listmail.innovate.net wrote:
------------ Original Message ------------
Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:18:45 -0500 From: Les Mikesell lesmikesell@gmail.com
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Richard lists-centos@listmail.innovate.net wrote:
Does anyone know what's up with:
Error: Package: marco-1.8.3-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) Requires: libgtop-2.0.so.10()(64bit)
Isn't the EPEL package built against stock Centos?
Check epel-testing, that's where it (still) was a few days ago I believe. [I don't have my C7 laptop on so can't confirm things quickly.]
Thanks, but it doesn't help to --enablerepo=epel-testing. The libgtop2 package should be from the base repo anyway.
Sorry, just checked. It looks to be in "cr".
So... the right thing to do for someone who just wants to update a system today would be???
Probably depends on your view of CR. Here's the announcement for it the other day:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2015-March/020980.html
I updated a machine the other day with a combination of CR and epel-testing (key MATE things were there still) and it seems fine, though I haven't tested it heavily yet. The epel things that were in -testing may have moved to epel base by now.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Richard lists-centos@listmail.innovate.net wrote:
Thanks, but it doesn't help to --enablerepo=epel-testing. The libgtop2 package should be from the base repo anyway.
Sorry, just checked. It looks to be in "cr".
So... the right thing to do for someone who just wants to update a system today would be???
Probably depends on your view of CR. Here's the announcement for it the other day:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2015-March/020980.html
I updated a machine the other day with a combination of CR and epel-testing (key MATE things were there still) and it seems fine, though I haven't tested it heavily yet. The epel things that were in -testing may have moved to epel base by now.
It's not so much a matter of having a "view" of CR as that I didn't expect things to appear in EPEL that depend on base versions that aren't in general release yet. Is that intentional, and don't some number of people have to approve something before it gets out of epel-testing? Does everyone else have cr enabled?
On 03/26/2015 04:47 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Richard lists-centos@listmail.innovate.net wrote:
Thanks, but it doesn't help to --enablerepo=epel-testing. The libgtop2 package should be from the base repo anyway.
Sorry, just checked. It looks to be in "cr".
So... the right thing to do for someone who just wants to update a system today would be???
Probably depends on your view of CR. Here's the announcement for it the other day:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2015-March/020980.html
I updated a machine the other day with a combination of CR and epel-testing (key MATE things were there still) and it seems fine, though I haven't tested it heavily yet. The epel things that were in -testing may have moved to epel base by now.
It's not so much a matter of having a "view" of CR as that I didn't expect things to appear in EPEL that depend on base versions that aren't in general release yet. Is that intentional, and don't some number of people have to approve something before it gets out of epel-testing? Does everyone else have cr enabled?
See my other post to this list. EPEL is written for and built against RHEL, which is on 7.1. You will either have to wait until we release our 7.1, use CR or buy RHEL.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
It's not so much a matter of having a "view" of CR as that I didn't expect things to appear in EPEL that depend on base versions that aren't in general release yet. Is that intentional, and don't some number of people have to approve something before it gets out of epel-testing? Does everyone else have cr enabled?
See my other post to this list. EPEL is written for and built against RHEL, which is on 7.1. You will either have to wait until we release our 7.1, use CR or buy RHEL.
That makes sense - but it also makes it an ongoing issue for Centos users to expect. It's not a serious problem for me, but it would be a bad first experience with CentOS if someone tries to install a system with MATE Desktop today.
On 03/26/2015 05:01 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org wrote:
It's not so much a matter of having a "view" of CR as that I didn't expect things to appear in EPEL that depend on base versions that aren't in general release yet. Is that intentional, and don't some number of people have to approve something before it gets out of epel-testing? Does everyone else have cr enabled?
See my other post to this list. EPEL is written for and built against RHEL, which is on 7.1. You will either have to wait until we release our 7.1, use CR or buy RHEL.
That makes sense - but it also makes it an ongoing issue for Centos users to expect. It's not a serious problem for me, but it would be a bad first experience with CentOS if someone tries to install a system with MATE Desktop today.
I understand that and believe me, we are working on the next release of CentOS as fast as we can. But, it takes time and I have no control over what they build EPEL against OR when they release things in it.
We are testing what we hope is our final tree right now in QA .. hopefully we will have a release in the next couple of days.
-
Johnny Hughes -
Les Mikesell -
Richard