Congrats to the CentOS@Home Folding Team! I see we're creeping up to break the 700 rank for teams.
Max
Max H. wrote:
Congrats to the CentOS@Home Folding Team! I see we're creeping up to break the 700 rank for teams.
We should make even more headway soon as I just took delivery of a bunch of dual opteron systems which need to be stress tested for a few weeks prior to deployment. 8-)
Cheers,
Chris Mauritz wrote:
Max H. wrote:
Congrats to the CentOS@Home Folding Team! I see we're creeping up to break the 700 rank for teams.
We should make even more headway soon as I just took delivery of a bunch of dual opteron systems which need to be stress tested for a few weeks prior to deployment. 8-) Cheers,
....which reminds me. I haven't delved into the 64-bit CentOS on production machines yet. Are there any glaring potential gotchas for generic LAMP type usage? They won't be doing anything exotic...just serving up web content and perhaps replace some dedicated DNS/bind and mail/postfix boxes. All the old systems being replaced are currently running CentOS 3.7 and I'd like to start migrating everything to 64-bit 4.3.
Cheers,
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 19:19 -0400, Chris Mauritz wrote:
Chris Mauritz wrote:
Max H. wrote:
Congrats to the CentOS@Home Folding Team! I see we're creeping up to break the 700 rank for teams.
We should make even more headway soon as I just took delivery of a bunch of dual opteron systems which need to be stress tested for a few weeks prior to deployment. 8-) Cheers,
....which reminds me. I haven't delved into the 64-bit CentOS on production machines yet. Are there any glaring potential gotchas for generic LAMP type usage? They won't be doing anything exotic...just serving up web content and perhaps replace some dedicated DNS/bind and mail/postfix boxes. All the old systems being replaced are currently running CentOS 3.7 and I'd like to start migrating everything to 64-bit 4.3.
So long as you are just doing server stuff and can keep everything x86_64 and keep i386 packages off the box, x86_64 works great.
Chris Mauritz wrote:
We should make even more headway soon as I just took delivery of a bunch of dual opteron systems which need to be stress tested for a few weeks prior to deployment. 8-)
Now I'm jealous. I've yet to play with any dual Opteron systems. That'll get us moving up in rank for sure! Have fun setting those up!
Max
On Thursday 11 May 2006 00:04, Chris Mauritz wrote:
Max H. wrote:
Congrats to the CentOS@Home Folding Team! I see we're creeping up to break the 700 rank for teams.
We should make even more headway soon as I just took delivery of a bunch of dual opteron systems which need to be stress tested for a few weeks prior to deployment. 8-)
Cheers,
We'd be even higher if the work assign server at 171.64.122.112 was still giving out work packets. It was not contactable last weekend meaning we lost lots of work units. I had to reinstall folding on several machines to get it to use another assign server ;-(
So check that your installation is still working.
Tony
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-
Chris Mauritz -
Johnny Hughes -
Max H. -
Tony Molloy