I know this is a centos forum but I suppose it would be appropriate to ask a redhat question :-)
Is anyone aware of a NFS client/server problem with Redhat 5.1 where the client/NFS do extra lookup() and getattr() calls? This is very similar to CentOS' problem, http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2635
My question is, would upgrading the kernel help? or is this a userland issue?
TIA
Mag Gam wrote:
I know this is a centos forum but I suppose it would be appropriate to ask a redhat question :-)
Is anyone aware of a NFS client/server problem with Redhat 5.1 where the client/NFS do extra lookup() and getattr() calls? This is very similar to CentOS' problem, http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2635
My question is, would upgrading the kernel help? or is this a userland issue?
Update to 5.2
Ralph
Not an option at my university :-(
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Ralph Angenendt ra+centos@br-online.de wrote:
Mag Gam wrote:
I know this is a centos forum but I suppose it would be appropriate to ask a redhat question :-)
Is anyone aware of a NFS client/server problem with Redhat 5.1 where the client/NFS do extra lookup() and getattr() calls? This is very similar to CentOS' problem, http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2635
My question is, would upgrading the kernel help? or is this a userland issue?
Update to 5.2
Ralph
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Mag Gam wrote:
Not an option at my university :-(
Then read through the bug report you mentioned and try one of those kernels. And update to 5.2 - as you won't get *any* security updates for 5.1 anymore except if you bought in for 5.1.z.
And don't top post and please trim your replies.
Ralph
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Mag Gam magawake@gmail.com wrote:
Not an option at my university :-(
Then you can try the patched kernel offered by Johnny Hughes:
http://people.centos.org/~hughesjr/kernel/5/bz321111/
Akemi
Thankyou everyone. I updated the 5.2 kernel onto 5.1 and everything seems to work fine.
Thanks for all of your help and wisdom.
TIA
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:15 AM, Akemi Yagi amyagi@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:22 AM, Mag Gam magawake@gmail.com wrote:
Not an option at my university :-(
Then you can try the patched kernel offered by Johnny Hughes:
http://people.centos.org/~hughesjr/kernel/5/bz321111/
Akemi _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
on 7-26-2008 9:54 AM Mag Gam spake the following:
Thankyou everyone. I updated the 5.2 kernel onto 5.1 and everything seems to work fine.
Thanks for all of your help and wisdom.
You still are at risk by not updating. The kernels are a small part of the security updates that came in 5.2.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:29 AM, John R Pierce pierce@hogranch.com wrote:
Mag Gam wrote:
Not an option at my university :-(
you mean, your university never installs security patches and updates?!?
5.1->5.2 is as simple as `yum update`
Or they no longer have RHN access. At which point, it would be better to move to CentOS.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Mag Gam magawake@gmail.com wrote:
Not an option at my university :-(
Well you were planning to update the kernel.. you need to get the one from 5.2.
on 7-25-2008 4:06 AM Mag Gam spake the following:
I know this is a centos forum but I suppose it would be appropriate to ask a redhat question :-)
Is anyone aware of a NFS client/server problem with Redhat 5.1 where the client/NFS do extra lookup() and getattr() calls? This is very similar to CentOS' problem, http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2635
My question is, would upgrading the kernel help? or is this a userland issue?
TIA
CentOS didn't make that problem, they inherited it from RedHat. 5.2 is supposed to fix that. Update when you can.