Hi,
Does anyone know what version of XEN works fine with CentOS 6?
I installed XEN on a CentOS 6 server, as per these instructions: http://www.crc.id.au/xen-on-rhel6-scientific-linux-6-centos-6-howto/
And the server now gives this error on reboot: PANIC: early exception
0e rip 10:0 error 10 cr2 0
These are the packages that was installed:
Installed: kernel-xen.x86_64 0:2.6.32.45-1 xen.x86_64 0:4.1.1-3.1
Dependency Installed: PyXML.x86_64 0:0.8.4-19.el6 SDL.x86_64 0:1.2.14-2.el6 kpartx.x86_64 0:0.4.9-31.el6_0.3 libXdamage.x86_64 0:1.1.2-1.el6 libXfixes.x86_64 0:4.0.4-1.el6 libXxf86vm.x86_64 0:1.1.0-1.el6 mesa-dri-drivers.x86_64 0:7.7-2.el6 mesa-libGL.x86_64 0:7.7-2.el6 xen-hypervisor.x86_64 0:4.1.1-3.1 xen-libs.x86_64 0:4.1.1-3.1 xen-licenses.x86_64 0:4.1.1-3.1 xen-runtime.x86_64 0:4.1.1-3.1
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Does anyone know what version of XEN works fine with CentOS 6?
I installed XEN on a CentOS 6 server, as per these instructions: http://www.crc.id.au/xen-on-rhel6-scientific-linux-6-centos-6-howto/
and this issue about a third party writeup is not asked first in that venue, because ?
and this issue about a virtualization issue is not asked on the specific virtualization list that Centos offers, because ?
and this invasive, non-shipped and competing virtualization method (at the 6 level) and non-shipped and non-supported kernel is asked here, because ?
Every time the ten or so people who treat this list like an 'anything goes' sewer post, tens of thousands of uses have to wade through the dross
Every time the few here who cannot distinquish email and run untrimmed one line reply emails back and forth, over and over again, rather than using the CentOS provided IRC channels, tens of thousands of uses have to wade through the dross
_Please_ be considerate, use the proper venue, brush and floss after meals, and research before posting ;)
-- Russ herrold
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 3:49 PM, R P Herrold herrold@owlriver.com wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Does anyone know what version of XEN works fine with CentOS 6?
I installed XEN on a CentOS 6 server, as per these instructions: http://www.crc.id.au/xen-on-rhel6-scientific-linux-6-centos-6-howto/
and this issue about a third party writeup is not asked first in that venue, because ?
and this issue about a virtualization issue is not asked on the specific virtualization list that Centos offers, because ?
and this invasive, non-shipped and competing virtualization method (at the 6 level) and non-shipped and non-supported kernel is asked here, because ?
Every time the ten or so people who treat this list like an 'anything goes' sewer post, tens of thousands of uses have to wade through the dross
Every time the few here who cannot distinquish email and run untrimmed one line reply emails back and forth, over and over again, rather than using the CentOS provided IRC channels, tens of thousands of uses have to wade through the dross
_Please_ be considerate, use the proper venue, brush and floss after meals, and research before posting ;)
-- Russ herrold _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Russ because everyone else has the same "I don't care, take it elsewhere attitude as you".
but don't worry, I'm leaving this childish list as well. have fun
On 09/02/2011 09:49 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Does anyone know what version of XEN works fine with CentOS 6?
I installed XEN on a CentOS 6 server, as per these instructions: http://www.crc.id.au/xen-on-rhel6-scientific-linux-6-centos-6-howto/
and this issue about a third party writeup is not asked first in that venue, because ?
and this issue about a virtualization issue is not asked on the specific virtualization list that Centos offers, because ?
and this invasive, non-shipped and competing virtualization method (at the 6 level) and non-shipped and non-supported kernel is asked here, because ?
Every time the ten or so people who treat this list like an 'anything goes' sewer post, tens of thousands of uses have to wade through the dross
Every time the few here who cannot distinquish email and run untrimmed one line reply emails back and forth, over and over again, rather than using the CentOS provided IRC channels, tens of thousands of uses have to wade through the dross
_Please_ be considerate, use the proper venue, brush and floss after meals, and research before posting ;)
-- Russ herrold
That was hardly called for. If you find a post off topic or uninteresting, just delete it. Either no one will reply or, if there is interest in the question, others will and the question will be decided to have value.
If we keep acting rude, we will tear apart this community. Please, for our collective sake, be more polite.
Digimer wrote:
On 09/02/2011 09:49 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Does anyone know what version of XEN works fine with CentOS 6?
I installed XEN on a CentOS 6 server, as per these instructions: http://www.crc.id.au/xen-on-rhel6-scientific-linux-6-centos-6-howto/
<snip>
_Please_ be considerate, use the proper venue, brush and floss after meals, and research before posting ;)
-- Russ herrold
That was hardly called for. If you find a post off topic or uninteresting, just delete it. Either no one will reply or, if there is interest in the question, others will and the question will be decided to have value.
having someone reply to an OT post doesn't make it on-topic. It just makes thousands of users have to delete another email. Similarly, having a helpful user give the answer that the OP would have found as google hit number 1, wastes everybody else's time.
So: use the proper venue instead of posting everything and anything here, and research before posting, are totally appropriate requests.
If we keep acting rude, we will tear apart this community. Please, for our collective sake, be more polite.
How was Russ's reply rude? He actually took the time to explain things... and remained civil doing it.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:02 PM, R - elists lists07@abbacomm.net wrote:
Can we discontinue this and return to tranquillity please ?
Paul.
Paul,
with all humility & due respect, if I was given authority within CentOS and on this list, you would be one of the first we would discipline...
- rh
Russ why don't you just discipline everyone? Cause no-one can stick to CentOS-only conversations in your righteous eyes.
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:02 PM, R - elists lists07@abbacomm.net wrote:
- rh
Russ why don't you just discipline everyone? Cause no-one can stick to CentOS-only conversations in your righteous eyes.
Rudi,
I know it is confusing to you , as Robert Heller and Russ Herrold share the same intiials, but I have not used the work 'discipline' in this thread, and indeed, my attitude is one of fostering thoughtful list membership
I've considered asking him to change his name, but concluded that was perhaps a bit extreme ;)
Oh -- and I thought you were de-subscribing?
with my best regards,
-- Russ herrold
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 14:34 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:02 PM, R - elists lists07@abbacomm.net wrote:
- rh
Russ why don't you just discipline everyone? Cause no-one can stick to CentOS-only conversations in your righteous eyes.
Rudi,
I know it is confusing to you , as Robert Heller and Russ Herrold share the same intiials, but I have not used the work 'discipline' in this thread, and indeed, my attitude is one of fostering thoughtful list membership
It is entirely possible the 'R' of abbacomm.net is an abbreviation for 'Robert' who has a different surname. Such confusion is possible in the best of families, even those using computers :-)
Oh -- and I thought you were de-subscribing?
I asked him not too. Lets have one big happy and united family.
Paul.
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Digimer wrote:
That was hardly called for. If you find a post off topic or uninteresting, just delete it. Either no one will reply or, if there is interest in the question, others will and the question will be decided to have value.
wrong
Seemingly you feel it is proper to burden tens of thousands of other people for personal pleasure ... others here display such an anti-social attitude as well
The CentOS team, of which I am a part, are stewards of the resource that CentOS has grown into. I spoke publicly quite intentionally, after prior private request on other OT matter he persisted in raising, with a hope in sensitizing a serial off topic poster, from repeating such improper behaviour
I won't 'suffer in silence' while people with muddy boots stomp around on the white carpet of my living room. If they won't respond to a private request, they get called out publicly
We do not hesitate to kick spammers off from posting rights [and listen to the list members rant and ring the spam with poorly trimmed reposts for days afterward]. Frankly sustained OT content or trolling are spam at a lower data rate. I do not favor silent censorship, but we who value the list as a resource need to protect the asset somehow. Thus my post
A fair reading of a month's archive and the seemingly infinite run-away threds readily shows the problem. The mail list is turning into the cesspool that main #centos IRC became when it was opened to OT and trolling. We need to do more than we have, all of us, who care about the project
Feel free to review the initial poster's history on this list, and contribution, vs leaching ratio. I won't miss him a bit, and frankly the list will likely not be poorer for his absence either
If you feel me wrong, feel free to start your own project and lists and prove me wrong
-- Russ herrold
On Sep 2, 2011, at 9:49 AM, R P Herrold herrold@owlriver.com wrote:
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Does anyone know what version of XEN works fine with CentOS 6?
I installed XEN on a CentOS 6 server, as per these instructions: http://www.crc.id.au/xen-on-rhel6-scientific-linux-6-centos-6-howto/
and this issue about a third party writeup is not asked first in that venue, because ?
and this issue about a virtualization issue is not asked on the specific virtualization list that Centos offers, because ?
and this invasive, non-shipped and competing virtualization method (at the 6 level) and non-shipped and non-supported kernel is asked here, because ?
Every time the ten or so people who treat this list like an 'anything goes' sewer post, tens of thousands of uses have to wade through the dross
Every time the few here who cannot distinquish email and run untrimmed one line reply emails back and forth, over and over again, rather than using the CentOS provided IRC channels, tens of thousands of uses have to wade through the dross
_Please_ be considerate, use the proper venue, brush and floss after meals, and research before posting ;)
Better to let these OT posts fall on deaf ears then make list noise on them.
And since I have just made noise I am going to shut up about this and any other OT post I see.
-Ross
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 02:44:09PM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know what version of XEN works fine with CentOS 6?
I installed XEN on a CentOS 6 server, as per these instructions: [1]http://www.crc.id.au/xen-on-rhel6-scientific-linux-6-centos-6-howto/
And the server now gives this error on reboot: PANIC: early exception
0e rip 10:0 error 10 cr2 0
These are the packages that was installed:
Installed: kernel-xen.x86_64 0:2.6.32.45-1 xen.x86_64 0:4.1.1-3.1
Dependency Installed: PyXML.x86_64 0:0.8.4-19.el6 SDL.x86_64 0:1.2.14-2.el6 kpartx.x86_64 0:0.4.9-31.el6_0.3 libXdamage.x86_64 0:1.1.2-1.el6 libXfixes.x86_64 0:4.0.4-1.el6 libXxf86vm.x86_64 0:1.1.0-1.el6 mesa-dri-drivers.x86_64 0:7.7-2.el6 mesa-libGL.x86_64 0:7.7-2.el6 xen-hypervisor.x86_64 0:4.1.1-3.1 xen-libs.x86_64 0:4.1.1-3.1 xen-licenses.x86_64 0:4.1.1-3.1 xen-runtime.x86_64 0:4.1.1-3.1
Did you try using mayoung's "xendom0" kernel rpms? They're based on actual rhel 6.0/6.1 kernels.. (the kernel you're using now sounds like upstream kernel - not rhel6 kernel).
xen hypervisor/tools rpms: http://xenbits.xen.org/people/mayoung/EL6.xen/ xendom0 kernel for el6: http://xenbits.xen.org/people/mayoung/testing/
And: http://wiki.xen.org/xenwiki/RHEL6Xen4Tutorial
-- Pasi
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen pasik@iki.fi wrote:
Did you try using mayoung's "xendom0" kernel rpms? They're based on actual rhel 6.0/6.1 kernels.. (the kernel you're using now sounds like upstream kernel - not rhel6 kernel).
xen hypervisor/tools rpms: http://xenbits.xen.org/people/mayoung/EL6.xen/ xendom0 kernel for el6: http://xenbits.xen.org/people/mayoung/testing/
How stable are those kernels? I couldn't find much info about mayoung on the internet, so I don't know how trustworthy he, or his work is.
I read that tutorial but it seems very specific to Red Hat and since I work on CentOS some of the options there don't apply, but I don't know if it could cause any problems.
Has anyone applied those steps to a CentOS system?
-- Pasi
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello Rudi,
Regarding the tutorial for RHEL6 and Xen I'd like to remind you of the fact that CentOS is 100% compatible clone of RHEL so basically everything you read and find on the internet regarding RHEL6 can usually be applied identically to any CentOS6 system as well ...
Regarding those kernels mentioned I'd assume as they are being offered by xen.org directly and made by one of their key developers they can be assumed stable and trustworthy - But if you want to setup a production site with Xen why not rely on XCP or choose another distribution that offers direct support for xen like e.g. debian (have a look at project "kronos" ) or ubuntu as well ...
Best regards, Andreas Balg
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] Im Auftrag von Rudi Ahlers Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. September 2011 09:17 An: CentOS mailing list Betreff: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 + XEN problem
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen pasik@iki.fi wrote:
Did you try using mayoung's "xendom0" kernel rpms? They're based on actual rhel 6.0/6.1 kernels.. (the kernel you're using now sounds like upstream kernel - not rhel6 kernel).
xen hypervisor/tools rpms: http://xenbits.xen.org/people/mayoung/EL6.xen/ xendom0 kernel for el6: http://xenbits.xen.org/people/mayoung/testing/
How stable are those kernels? I couldn't find much info about mayoung on the internet, so I don't know how trustworthy he, or his work is.
I read that tutorial but it seems very specific to Red Hat and since I work on CentOS some of the options there don't apply, but I don't know if it could cause any problems.
Has anyone applied those steps to a CentOS system?
-- Pasi
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-
Always Learning -
andreas.balg＠srf.ch -
Digimer -
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg -
Pasi Kärkkäinen -
R - elists -
R P Herrold -
R P Herrold -
Ross Walker -
Rudi Ahlers