This is kind of figured out now.
The actual RPM I'm using is from the debuginfo repo here:
http://debuginfo.centos.org/5/x86_64/gfs2-kmod-debuginfo-1.92-1.1.el5_2.2.x8...
The contents of the RPM are identical to the RedHat RPM:
http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/x86_64/Debug...
The problem here is that the source included in the debuginfo RPM does not match the binary.
When running the binary, I get "f:q" in my gfs2_tool lockdump output, which definitely cannot happen given the source code in the RPM.
It appears that this patch has been applied during compilation. https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2011-May/msg00037.html But the patch is not applied to the source code included.
Clearly this is not a CentOS issue as the RedHat RPM is wrong too, so this is just informational to close out the issue.
Brian
On 11-06-2011 at 2:05 AM, John Doe jdmls@yahoo.com wrote:
From: "centoslistbrian@nym.hush.com" centoslistbrian@nym.hush.com
I'm searching for the SRPM corresponding to this installed RPM. % yum list | grep gfs2 gfs2-kmod-debuginfo.x86_64 1.92-1.1.el5_2.2 It is missing from: http://msync.centos.org/centos-5/5/os/SRPMS/
How can you expect to find a CentOS srpm for a package that does not come from CentOS...? As you can see, http://msync.centos.org/centos-5/5/os/i386/CentOS/ only lists gfs2-utils
JD _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-
centoslistbrian＠nym.hush.com