I recently ran into some problems using certain oVirt (3.3) features on CentOS 6.4 hosts. The solution was to use the qemu-kvm-rhev version from the EL6 RHEV repository: http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/qemu...
It seems that this tree is not carried/built by CentOS. Are there any plans on the CentOS for carrying these packages?
Some background information:
- http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2013-November/017652.html - http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2013-November/017722.html
Best regards,
Sander
On 11.11.2013 14:59, Sander Grendelman wrote:
I recently ran into some problems using certain oVirt (3.3) features on CentOS 6.4 hosts. The solution was to use the qemu-kvm-rhev version from the EL6 RHEV repository: http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/qemu...
It seems that this tree is not carried/built by CentOS. Are there any plans on the CentOS for carrying these packages?
How does this differ from stock kvm?
The important difference in this case is support for live snapshots.
There's probably also some additional support for RHEV/oVirt integration.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Nux! nux@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 11.11.2013 14:59, Sander Grendelman wrote:
I recently ran into some problems using certain oVirt (3.3) features on CentOS 6.4 hosts. The solution was to use the qemu-kvm-rhev version from the EL6 RHEV repository: http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/qemu...
It seems that this tree is not carried/built by CentOS. Are there any plans on the CentOS for carrying these packages?
How does this differ from stock kvm?
-- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux! www.nux.ro _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 11.11.2013 16:34, Nux! wrote:
On 11.11.2013 14:59, Sander Grendelman wrote:
I recently ran into some problems using certain oVirt (3.3) features on CentOS 6.4 hosts. The solution was to use the qemu-kvm-rhev version from the EL6 RHEV repository: http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/qemu...
It seems that this tree is not carried/built by CentOS. Are there any plans on the CentOS for carrying these packages?
How does this differ from stock kvm?
It is basically the same srpm. Both srpms have it all. The rhev rpm only defines "rhev 1" in its spec and therefore enables more features. It also properly obsoletes the base qemu-kvm package then.
Patrick
On 11.Nov.2013, at 15:59, Sander Grendelman wrote:
I recently ran into some problems using certain oVirt (3.3) features on CentOS 6.4 hosts. The solution was to use the qemu-kvm-rhev version from the EL6 RHEV repository: http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/qemu...
It seems that this tree is not carried/built by CentOS. Are there any plans on the CentOS for carrying these packages?
CentOSV ? This would be cool. Is all of RHEV open sourced?
On 11.11.2013 17:28, Markus Falb wrote:
On 11.Nov.2013, at 15:59, Sander Grendelman wrote:
I recently ran into some problems using certain oVirt (3.3) features on CentOS 6.4 hosts. The solution was to use the qemu-kvm-rhev version from the EL6 RHEV repository: http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/qemu...
It seems that this tree is not carried/built by CentOS. Are there any plans on the CentOS for carrying these packages?
CentOSV ? This would be cool. Is all of RHEV open sourced?
Yes, I believe so. Check out ovirt.org. BTW built that SRPM, if someone feels in testing mood: http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/tmp/kvm-rhev/el6/