I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class.
Thanks for the effort!
LF
On 02/04/2017 04:55 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class.
Thanks for the effort!
LF
I rebuild the Fedora Rawhide version of FireFox with a few tweaks to the spec file (needed to get it to build).
Do not depend upon me to respond to security issues with it in a timely manner, but if you want it -
http://awel.domblogger.net/7/misc/x86_64/repoview/firefox.html
src
Am 04.02.2017 um 13:55 schrieb Leon Fauster leonfauster@googlemail.com:
I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class.
OK, I see. The ffmpeg support is reenabled now (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330898). This makes the centosplus version obsolete ...
-- LF
On 02/04/2017 06:55 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class.
The CentOS Plus version of Firefox was released because of the decision upstream to disable ffmpeg.
The newest upstream release re-enabled ffmpeg, so the CentOS Plus version is no longer needed. Use the latest firefox in updates now.
Am 09.02.2017 um 16:10 schrieb Johnny Hughes johnny@centos.org:
On 02/04/2017 06:55 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class.
The CentOS Plus version of Firefox was released because of the decision upstream to disable ffmpeg.
The newest upstream release re-enabled ffmpeg, so the CentOS Plus version is no longer needed. Use the latest firefox in updates now.
Thanks for the feedback ...
-- LF
-
Alice Wonder -
Johnny Hughes -
Leon Fauster