"It takes years to build a reputation and seconds to destroy it."
-- Business 101 class
Best regards, Fred
El jue, 10 dic 2020 a las 15:48, Kienker, Fred (fkienker@at4b.com) escribió:
"It takes years to build a reputation and seconds to destroy it."
-- Business 101 class
Fear not in DEVops world you can rebuild your reputation in one seconds using containers. :-P
On 11.12.2020 02:08, Sergio Belkin wrote:
El jue, 10 dic 2020 a las 15:48, Kienker, Fred (fkienker@at4b.com) escribió:
"It takes years to build a reputation and seconds to destroy it."
-- Business 101 class
Fear not in DEVops world you can rebuild your reputation in one seconds using containers. :-P
Reputation as a Service (RepaaS)?
Let's see whether RH has proper containers.
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:08:09 -0300 Sergio Belkin sebelk@gmail.com wrote:
El jue, 10 dic 2020 a las 15:48, Kienker, Fred (fkienker@at4b.com) escribió:
"It takes years to build a reputation and seconds to destroy it."
-- Business 101 class
Fear not in DEVops world you can rebuild your reputation in one seconds using containers. :-P
Except that there are no container images available for Stream. :(
(I am not complaining, just pointing out the irony.)
Seriously, many thanks to the CentOS team for their decades of fine work. CentOS as I know it is being discontinued and I will evaluate Stream as its own product on its own merits.
Jim
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 07:13:19AM -0700, James Szinger wrote:
Except that there are no container images available for Stream. :(
There certainly will be.
Also for container use cases, you might want to consider UBI, which is literal RHEL binaries, and which becomes supported when run on supported RHEL systems but is free to run anywhere.
On 12/11/2020 8:12 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 07:13:19AM -0700, James Szinger wrote:
Except that there are no container images available for Stream. :(
There certainly will be.
Also for container use cases, you might want to consider UBI, which is literal RHEL binaries, and which becomes supported when run on supported RHEL systems but is free to run anywhere.
It would be nice to have updates from RedHat on where it's positioning UBI then. Previously it had directly pointed to specific target use-cases, which limit its usefulness for even some pretty simple cases outside that baliwick. Example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758358#c3
-jc
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 09:39:54AM -0800, Japheth Cleaver wrote:
It would be nice to have updates from RedHat on where it's positioning UBI then. Previously it had directly pointed to specific target use-cases, which limit its usefulness for even some pretty simple cases outside that baliwick. Example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758358#c3
I am not part of the decision-making chain for this (personally, I would have swung bigger!) but I respect the people who are, and as I understand it, the intention is to demonstrate success in those constrained use-cases and grow carefully from there (that's what Scott says in that bug, and I'm sure he's not making it up).
I think probably these "simple outside-the-baliwick" cases are good to send to the centos-questions@redhat.com address, or to bug Scott about specifically with more details of the use case. That bug has "it may be useful for some users" but if you can expand that with several user stories it might be more compelling.
-
James Szinger -
Japheth Cleaver -
Kienker, Fred -
Konstantin Boyandin -
Matthew Miller -
Sergio Belkin