Hi all,
I was about to do an update on my server, but looking at what the output was and here's the output from the beginning with other parts left off. I currently don't even have the clamav server installed, but am using the 0.93 version of clamav-milter. I've never seen yum throw in so many packages that aren't even installed. I understand the dependencies has to be met, and such, but why is yum trying to install older version of clamav? Perhaps I missed something, but don't think so.
Many thanks,
Sam
Here is the output from yum update
============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: clamav-data i386 0.88.2-2.el4.kb kbs-CentOS-Extras 4.1 M replacing clamav-db.i386 0.93.1-1.el4.rf
clamav-server i386 0.88.2-2.el4.kb kbs-CentOS-Extras 48 k replacing clamd.i386 0.93.1-1.el4.rf
kernel i686 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL update 12 M kernel-devel i686 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL update 3.9 M Updating: autofs i386 1:4.1.3-231.el4_6.2 update 264 k bind i386 20:9.2.4-28.0.1.el4 update 581 k bind-chroot i386 20:9.2.4-28.0.1.el4 update 35 k bind-libs i386 20:9.2.4-28.0.1.el4 update 567 k bind-utils i386 20:9.2.4-28.0.1.el4 update 141 k bluez-libs i386 2.10-3 update 39 k bluez-utils i386 2.10-2.4 update 150 k caching-nameserver noarch 7.3-3.0.1.el4_6 update 22 k clamav i386 0.93.3-1.el4.rf rpmforge 1.3 M clamav-milter i386 0.93.3-1.el4.rf rpmforge 76 k firefox i386 1.5.0.12-0.21.el4.centos update 15 M freetype i386 2.1.9-8.el4.6 update 764 k freetype-devel i386 2.1.9-8.el4.6 update 533 k kernel-hugemem-devel i686 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL update 3.9 M kernel-smp-devel i686 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL update 3.9 M openldap i386 2.2.13-8.el4_6.5 update 237 k openldap-clients i386 2.2.13-8.el4_6.5 update 121 k openldap-devel i386 2.2.13-8.el4_6.5 update 1.3 M perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib i386 2.011-1.el4.rf rpmforge 158 k perl-IO-Compress-Base noarch 2.011-1.el4.rf rpmforge 55 k perl-IO-Compress-Zlib noarch 2.011-1.el4.rf rpmforge 140 k php i386 4.3.9-3.22.12 update 1.3 M php-ldap i386 4.3.9-3.22.12 update 36 k php-mysql i386 4.3.9-3.22.12 update 37 k php-pear i386 4.3.9-3.22.12 update 481 k procps i386 3.2.3-8.9.el4_6.1 update 189 k seamonkey i386 1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos update 8.7 M seamonkey-nspr i386 1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos update 101 k seamonkey-nss i386 1.0.9-16.4.el4.centos update 745 k selinux-policy-targeted noarch 1.17.30-2.150.el4 update 125 k Installing for dependencies: clamav-lib i386 0.88.2-2.el4.kb kbs-CentOS-Extras 144 k Updating for dependencies: clamav-db i386 0.93.3-1.el4.rf rpmforge 15 M clamd i386 0.93.3-1.el4.rf rpmforge 82 k
Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 5 Package(s) Update 32 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 76 M Is this ok [y/N]: n Exiting on user Command Complete!
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Sam Drinkard sam@wa4phy.net wrote:
Hi all,
I was about to do an update on my server, but looking at what the output was and here's the output from the beginning with other parts left off. I currently don't even have the clamav server installed, but am using the 0.93 version of clamav-milter. I've never seen yum throw in so many packages that aren't even installed. I understand the dependencies has to be met, and such, but why is yum trying to install older version of clamav? Perhaps I missed something, but don't think so.
Appears to be yet another instance of mixing repositories. You have both kb and rpmforge, each of which has clamav packages. Disable one of the repos.
Jeff wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Sam Drinkard sam@wa4phy.net wrote:
Hi all,
I was about to do an update on my server, but looking at what the output was and here's the output from the beginning with other parts left off. I currently don't even have the clamav server installed, but am using the 0.93 version of clamav-milter. I've never seen yum throw in so many packages that aren't even installed. I understand the dependencies has to be met, and such, but why is yum trying to install older version of clamav? Perhaps I missed something, but don't think so.
Appears to be yet another instance of mixing repositories. You have both kb and rpmforge, each of which has clamav packages. Disable one of the repos.
Of use yum-priorities and set one of the repos to a higher priority ... or add exclude=clamav* in the kbs repo file as you currently have clamav from rpmforge installed.
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 09:17 -0500, Jeff wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Sam Drinkard sam@wa4phy.net wrote:
Hi all,
I was about to do an update on my server, but looking at what the output was and here's the output from the beginning with other parts left off. I currently don't even have the clamav server installed, but am using the 0.93 version of clamav-milter. I've never seen yum throw in so many packages that aren't even installed. I understand the dependencies has to be met, and such, but why is yum trying to install older version of clamav? Perhaps I missed something, but don't think so.
Appears to be yet another instance of mixing repositories. You have both kb and rpmforge, each of which has clamav packages. Disable one of the repos.
And look at using the yum priorities plugin so you can safely mix repos.
William L. Maltby ha scritto:
And look at using the yum priorities plugin so you can safely mix repos.
I have one question about this:
Which is the "safest" setup for priorities?
base, update and extras: priority=1 ATrpms (which should not replace _any_ base package): priority=10 rpmforge (which could have some base package updated): priority=20 EPEL: priority=30
and so on with other repos...
Does this look reasonable?
TIA
Lorenzo
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
William L. Maltby ha scritto:
And look at using the yum priorities plugin so you can safely mix repos.
I have one question about this:
Which is the "safest" setup for priorities?
base, update and extras: priority=1 ATrpms (which should not replace _any_ base package): priority=10 rpmforge (which could have some base package updated): priority=20 EPEL: priority=30
and so on with other repos...
Does this look reasonable?
that looks OK ... the other affect of this is that ATrpms have precedence over rpmforge, which has precedence over EPEL, etc.
So, if that is the precedence you want then that is the way to go.
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 10:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
<snip>
Which is the "safest" setup for priorities?
base, update and extras: priority=1 ATrpms (which should not replace _any_ base package): priority=10 rpmforge (which could have some base package updated): priority=20 EPEL: priority=30
and so on with other repos...
Does this look reasonable?
that looks OK ... the other affect of this is that ATrpms have precedence over rpmforge, which has precedence over EPEL, etc.
So, if that is the precedence you want then that is the way to go.
And don't forget to either disable or remove "protect" if you have them installed/enabled. Look at them as mutually exclusive.
<snip sig stuff>
-
Jeff -
Johnny Hughes -
Lorenzo Quatrini -
Sam Drinkard -
William L. Maltby