On 25.Sep.2013, at 19:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.09.2013 18:39, schrieb Markus Falb:
On 25.Sep.2013, at 13:57, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
This should really be directed at a PHP forum. I would suspect that something with the server certificate is not ok.
oh my, centos says it's php thing php says, what?, 5.1.6 is seven years old
http://marc.info/?l=php-general&m=138011820514388
The backporting oath?
any why do you not update your crap? PHP 5.1 is irrelevant these days
Now I am irritated. RHEL 5 is supported until 2017, so is CentOS 5, isn't it? It comes with php and it comes with php53. You tell me I am a crapper because I use php. I would have expected such things from the php mailing list, but on CentOS…. In other words, do not tell me on the CentOS Mailing List that I am dumb if I use a package provided by CentOS (that's silly)
that's why CentOS/RHEL provides 5.3 packages without break environments rely on 5.1
It really doesn't break? I cant believe that.
On 9/25/2013 11:46 AM, Markus Falb wrote:
It really doesn't break? I cant believe that.
indeed, updating a centos5 webserver I have from php5.1 to php53 broke a bunch of my webpiles, triggering a bunch of rework I hadn't planned. this particular set of webpiles are all charity work, various local clubs and such.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Markus Falb wnefal@gmail.com wrote:
On 25.Sep.2013, at 19:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 25.09.2013 18:39, schrieb Markus Falb:
On 25.Sep.2013, at 13:57, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
This should really be directed at a PHP forum. I would suspect that something with the server certificate is not ok.
oh my, centos says it's php thing php says, what?, 5.1.6 is seven years old
http://marc.info/?l=php-general&m=138011820514388
The backporting oath?
Yes, backporting makes this interesting when seeking support. Ultimately it's a question for CentOS (or Upstream).
that's why CentOS/RHEL provides 5.3 packages without break environments
rely on 5.1
It really doesn't break? I cant believe that.
(Echoing John Pierce's warning...) If you update from PHP 5.1 or 5.2 to 5.3 you will have problems to deal with. I made the move and I too had broken code to fix!
[ Although the fixes/modifications are rather easy (just in case you have to go that direction). ]
-- Markus _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 09/25/2013 06:14 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
Yes, backporting makes this interesting when seeking support. Ultimately it's a question for CentOS (or Upstream).
Our policy on this has been pretty straight-forward from the beginning. We will reproduce what upstream provides. Bug for bug, and patch for patch as closely as we can. In this instance, it would seem that this issue should be filed in RH's bugzilla, or on the CentOS bugtracker with the relevant information so that it can be duplicated in RH's bugzilla, and then linked appropriately.
So long as it's not a bug we introduced as part of the rebuild process, it's usually better to not have it addressed by us. Going down that road would move us away from the compatibility we strive for. Worst case scenario would be that our patch introduces other issues, or is incompatible with a future update from upstream.
-
Jim Perrin -
John R Pierce -
Markus Falb -
SilverTip257