Hey all, back from vacation and seeing ansible 2.12 in the repos now. Anything to be aware of when upgrading from 2.9 to 2.12 in CS8?
-- Thanks, Leon
On 21/02/2022 15:49, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
Hey all, back from vacation and seeing ansible 2.12 in the repos now. Anything to be aware of when upgrading from 2.9 to 2.12 in CS8?
-- Thanks, Leon
You'd be lucky if it works directly , as there were some semantic changes in ansible, so you'll probably have to review all the changes, and if ansible-core just has the modules (it's a stripped down version of ansible, as you're supposed to download the collections yourself) , and use FQCN (Fully Qualified Collection Names) for modules ...
FWIW, CentOS Infra still on ansible 2.9.27 from our own configuration management SIG and ansible-core excluded in yum/dnf to ensure that our automation still runs fine (until we have time to test/convert all our roles/tasks/playbooks to run on ansible 5 - aka ansible-core 2.12.x)
Am 21.02.22 um 16:24 schrieb Fabian Arrotin:
On 21/02/2022 15:49, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
Hey all, back from vacation and seeing ansible 2.12 in the repos now. Anything to be aware of when upgrading from 2.9 to 2.12 in CS8?
You'd be lucky if it works directly , as there were some semantic changes in ansible, so you'll probably have to review all the changes, and if ansible-core just has the modules (it's a stripped down version of ansible, as you're supposed to download the collections yourself) , and use FQCN (Fully Qualified Collection Names) for modules ...
FWIW, CentOS Infra still on ansible 2.9.27 from our own configuration management SIG and ansible-core excluded in yum/dnf to ensure that our automation still runs fine (until we have time to test/convert all our roles/tasks/playbooks to run on ansible 5 - aka ansible-core 2.12.x)
Thanks Fabian for the insights. I was planning such tests for May but that seems to be to late now.
I remember that someone wanted to provide a meta package that pull additional ansible collections to give a similar experience like 2.9? Maybe more an EPEL question ...
-- Leon
On 22/02/2022 22:37, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
Am 21.02.22 um 16:24 schrieb Fabian Arrotin:
On 21/02/2022 15:49, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
Hey all, back from vacation and seeing ansible 2.12 in the repos now. Anything to be aware of when upgrading from 2.9 to 2.12 in CS8?
You'd be lucky if it works directly , as there were some semantic changes in ansible, so you'll probably have to review all the changes, and if ansible-core just has the modules (it's a stripped down version of ansible, as you're supposed to download the collections yourself) , and use FQCN (Fully Qualified Collection Names) for modules ...
FWIW, CentOS Infra still on ansible 2.9.27 from our own configuration management SIG and ansible-core excluded in yum/dnf to ensure that our automation still runs fine (until we have time to test/convert all our roles/tasks/playbooks to run on ansible 5 - aka ansible-core 2.12.x)
Thanks Fabian for the insights. I was planning such tests for May but that seems to be to late now.
I remember that someone wanted to provide a meta package that pull additional ansible collections to give a similar experience like 2.9? Maybe more an EPEL question ...
-- Leon
There is indeed a an effort to have an ansible meta-package that would pull both ansible-core and would contain collections (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ansible5)
I already had a look myself to see how to rebuild/provide it through configmanagement SIG eventually, as we now have ansible-core availble Some packages for ansible 5.x are already built on koji.fedoraproject.org (see https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=13842) but not yet available for epel8, due to lack of ansible-core in RHEL 8 (for now, but coming as it's in 8-stream, so in advance)
Other introduced problem with ansible-core is the dep on python 3.8, meaning that while we had ara (Ansible Records Ansible dashboard) available in configmanagement SIG, it needs to be using same python interpreter version for the callback, and previous one was built against/for python 3.6 (like ansible 2.9.x) , so quite some changes ...
-
Fabian Arrotin -
Leon Fauster