Has anyone experienced any difficulties of getting the pre-installation script for CentOS 7 to run?
Regards, j
On 02/09/2015 11:39 AM, Jerome Yanga wrote:
Has anyone experienced any difficulties of getting the pre-installation script for CentOS 7 to run?
pre-installation?
hell, i can not get centos 7 to install on a bare drive. :-\
looks like i am going to wait a few years for devs to get *all* the bugs out of 7 before i leave 6.6
On 02/09/15 14:09, g wrote:
On 02/09/2015 11:39 AM, Jerome Yanga wrote:
Has anyone experienced any difficulties of getting the pre-installation script for CentOS 7 to run?
pre-installation?
hell, i can not get centos 7 to install on a bare drive. :-\
looks like i am going to wait a few years for devs to get *all* the bugs out of 7 before i leave 6.6
That's my plan too. I figure that I'll try it when it gets to 7.3.
On 02/09/2015 05:10 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 02/09/15 14:09, g wrote:
On 02/09/2015 11:39 AM, Jerome Yanga wrote:
Has anyone experienced any difficulties of getting the pre-installation script for CentOS 7 to run?
pre-installation?
hell, i can not get centos 7 to install on a bare drive. :-\
looks like i am going to wait a few years for devs to get *all* the bugs out of 7 before i leave 6.6
That's my plan too. I figure that I'll try it when it gets to 7.3.
i thought it was better to use the even number revisions.
On 2/9/2015 9:15 PM, g wrote:>
On 02/09/2015 05:10 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
That's my plan too. I figure that I'll try it when it gets to 7.3.
i thought it was better to use the even number revisions.
I think the even numbers advice only applies to Star Trek movies.
CentOS 7.3 will be usable, but 7.3.11 for Workgroups is where things will really take off.
On 02/10/2015 06:53 AM, Chris Beattie wrote:
i thought it was better to use the even number revisions.
I think the even numbers advice only applies to Star Trek movies.
The "even number" thing was coincidental and subjective, and pre-dates RHEL. If it was ever true, it hasn't been true since 2002. It's amazing how some bits of conventional wisdom persist LONG after they should be forgot.
Managed to figure this out. A peer of mine used windows to create the kickstart file. This made it hard for the installer to read it as there are nonprintable characters. After converting the kickstart file to unix format, the prescript started working.
Thank you all.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Gordon Messmer gordon.messmer@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/10/2015 06:53 AM, Chris Beattie wrote:
i thought it was better to use the even number revisions.
I think the even numbers advice only applies to Star Trek movies.
The "even number" thing was coincidental and subjective, and pre-dates RHEL. If it was ever true, it hasn't been true since 2002. It's amazing how some bits of conventional wisdom persist LONG after they should be forgot.
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-
Chris Beattie -
g -
Gordon Messmer -
Jerome Yanga -
Mark LaPierre