Hi,
I am trying to install Gnumeric in CentOS 4 and I can't. It complains about quite a few dependencies failing. It suggested installing some postgresql librairies, openldap librairies... I did that, now I still get:
dependencies failed: libmdb/libmdbsq/libsqlite/libxbase/libtds.
Is there a yum repository that has them or a yum repository for gnumeric?
I have tried Dag, he does not, he has libgda, but that has other requirements...
centos@911networks.com wrote:
Is there a yum repository that has them or a yum repository for gnumeric?
I have a snapshot of gnumeric in my Misc repository ( for i386 only so far, x86_64 and ppc coming soon ). Repo Setup instructions are included on the start page ( http://centos.karan.org/ ). You will need both the Misc and FExtras repo's setup.
"yum install gnumeric" should then do the magic.
- KB
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 2:02 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
centos@911networks.com wrote:
Is there a yum repository that has them or a yum repository for gnumeric?
I have a snapshot of gnumeric in my Misc repository ( for i386 only so far, x86_64 and ppc coming soon ). Repo Setup instructions are included on the start page ( http://centos.karan.org/ ). You will need both the Misc and FExtras repo's setup.
"yum install gnumeric" should then do the magic.
somehow it does not work for me... I am not able to find the FExtra .repo file
Any hint ?
Igor
on 2/27/2008 2:24 PM Primorec spake the following:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 2:02 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@karan.org mailto:mail-lists@karan.org> wrote:
centos@911networks.com <mailto:centos@911networks.com> wrote: > Is there a yum repository that has them or a yum repository for > gnumeric? > I have a snapshot of gnumeric in my Misc repository ( for i386 only so far, x86_64 and ppc coming soon ). Repo Setup instructions are included on the start page ( http://centos.karan.org/ ). You will need both the Misc and FExtras repo's setup. "yum install gnumeric" should then do the magic.somehow it does not work for me... I am not able to find the FExtra .repo file
Did you follow instructions on the webpage? ( http://centos.karan.org/ )
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Scott Silva ssilva@sgvwater.com wrote:
on 2/27/2008 2:24 PM Primorec spake the following:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 2:02 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists@karan.org mailto:mail-lists@karan.org> wrote:
centos@911networks.com <mailto:centos@911networks.com> wrote: > Is there a yum repository that has them or a yum repository for > gnumeric? > I have a snapshot of gnumeric in my Misc repository ( for i386 onlyso
far, x86_64 and ppc coming soon ). Repo Setup instructions areincluded
on the start page ( http://centos.karan.org/ ). You will need boththe
Misc and FExtras repo's setup. "yum install gnumeric" should then do the magic.somehow it does not work for me... I am not able to find the FExtra .repo file
Did you follow instructions on the webpage? ( http://centos.karan.org/ )
Yes, I did. On that page is written (among other things):
............... There are two repositories hosted here, the Fedora Extras rebuilt for CentOS and the Misc pkg. The Misc pkg tree includes various rpms that I have built from source or src.rpm rebuilds. There might be pkgs there that will overwrite / replace core pkgs included in CentOS. To use the Misc Pkgs repository, you will need the FExtras repo enabled as well, some of the dependencies are resolved there. ..............
There is nowhere to find .repo file for FExtras. I am assuming that this kbsingh-CentOS-Extras.repohttp://centos.karan.org/kbsingh-CentOS-Extras.repo is the correct .repo file for FExtras. And, I am assuming that this kbsingh-CentOS-Misc.repohttp://centos.karan.org/kbsingh-CentOS-Misc.repo is the .repo file for Misc Pkgs.
So, I've installed both .repo files into /etc/yum.repos.d/
Here is the list. As you can see there IS the karan (kbsingh) repo file(s) /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Media.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-fasttrack.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/epel-testing.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/kbsingh-CentOS-Extras.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/kbsingh-CentOS-Misc.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/mirrors-rpmforge /etc/yum.repos.d/rpmforge.repo
Once everything was in place I've typed:
[root@legolas ]# yum install gnumeric Loading "installonlyn" plugin Loading "priorities" plugin Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories epel 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 kbs-CentOS-Extras 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 fasttrack 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 rpmforge 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 base 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 updates 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 kbs-CentOS-Misc 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 addons 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 extras 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00 Reading repository metadata in from local files 0 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Parsing package install arguments Nothing to do
Here I am now. I do not know how to procede from here.
Any help is very welcome
Igor
Primorec wrote:
[root@legolas ]# yum install gnumeric Parsing package install arguments Nothing to do
Here I am now. I do not know how to procede from here.
What arch are you running ?
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
Primorec wrote:
[root@legolas ]# yum install gnumeric
Parsing package install arguments Nothing to do
Here I am now. I do not know how to procede from here.
What arch are you running ?
Is this the correct answer ?
[root@legolas downloads]# uname -a Linux legolas.?????.com 2.6.18-53.1.6.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 23 11:30:20 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
on 2/27/2008 4:31 PM Primorec spake the following:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists-XASut8F7j/3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org wrote:
Primorec wrote:
[root@legolas ]# yum install gnumeric Parsing package install arguments Nothing to do
Here I am now. I do not know how to procede from here.
What arch are you running ?
Is this the correct answer ?
[root@legolas downloads]# uname -a Linux legolas.?????.com 2.6.18-53.1.6.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 23 11:30:20 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Karanbir said they were available for CentOS "4". It looks like you have "5".
on 2/27/2008 4:38 PM Scott Silva spake the following:
on 2/27/2008 4:31 PM Primorec spake the following:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists-XASut8F7j/3YtjvyW6yDsg-XMD5yJDbdMReXY1tMh2IBg@public.gmane.org wrote:
Primorec wrote:
[root@legolas ]# yum install gnumeric Parsing package install arguments Nothing to do
Here I am now. I do not know how to procede from here.
What arch are you running ?
Is this the correct answer ?
[root@legolas downloads]# uname -a Linux legolas.?????.com 2.6.18-53.1.6.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 23 11:30:20 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Karanbir said they were available for CentOS "4". It looks like you have "5".
Correction--- The original poster asked for CentOS 4 and Karanbir replied on availability. I don't see it for CentOS 5, not even in testing or source there.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Scott Silva ssilva@sgvwater.com wrote:
on 2/27/2008 4:38 PM Scott Silva spake the following:
on 2/27/2008 4:31 PM Primorec spake the following:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists-XASut8F7j/3YtjvyW6yDsg-XMD5yJDbdMReXY1tMh2IBg@public.gmane.org
wrote:
Primorec wrote:
[root@legolas ]# yum install gnumeric Parsing package install arguments Nothing to do
Here I am now. I do not know how to procede from here.
What arch are you running ?
Is this the correct answer ?
[root@legolas downloads]# uname -a Linux legolas.?????.com 2.6.18-53.1.6.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 23 11:30:20 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Karanbir said they were available for CentOS "4". It looks like you have "5".
Correction--- The original poster asked for CentOS 4 and Karanbir replied on availability. I don't see it for CentOS 5, not even in testing or source there.
I stand corrected.
Igor
P.S. Karanbir, will gnumeric be included into the repository in the future ?
Primorec wrote:
P.S. Karanbir, will gnumeric be included into the repository in the future ?
I've added it to the buildqueue a few minues back, it should show up in the testing C5 repo either later today or in the morning tomorrow.
- KB
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
Primorec wrote:
P.S. Karanbir, will gnumeric be included into the repository in the future ?
I've added it to the buildqueue a few minues back, it should show up in the testing C5 repo either later today or in the morning tomorrow.
wow wow wow I am flabbergasted ...
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
I've added it to the buildqueue a few minues back, it should show up in the testing C5 repo either later today or in the morning tomorrow.
I've checked today here
Extras Testing: i386 = http://centos.karan.org/el5/extras/testing/i386/RPMS/ x86_64 Sources
Could not find gnumeric (yet).
Am I looking into the right repository ?
Igor
P.S. as of today March 1st, latest builds are (no gnumeric)
libprelude-python-0.9.16.2-1.el5.kb.i386.rpm 16-Feb-2008 14:28 180K [ ] mysql-proxy-0.6.1-1.el5.kb.i386.rpm 28-Feb-2008 01:51 81K [ ] qemu-0.9.1-3.el5.kb.1.i386.rpm 28-Feb-2008 01:51 9.6M [ ] qemu-0.9.1-3.el5.kb.1.i686.rpm 28-Feb-2008 01:51 9.6M [ ] pam_mysql-0.7-0.5.rc1.el5.kb.2.i386.rpm 28-Feb-2008 02:02 38K [ ] straw-0.27-12.el5.kb.noarch.rpm 28-Feb-2008 02:27 504K [ ] pure-ftpd-1.0.21-15.el5.kb.i386.rpm 28-Feb-2008 02:32 236K [ ] pure-ftpd-selinux-1.0.21-15.el5.kb.i386.rpm 28-Feb-2008 02:32 12K [ ] ipython-0.8.2-1.el5.kb.noarch.rpm 28-Feb-2008 02:35 1.7M [ ] pyparsing-1.4.7-1.el5.kb.noarch.rpm 28-Feb-2008 19:08 810K [ ] pydot-0.9.10-5.el5.kb.noarch.rpm 28-Feb-2008 19:14 45K [ ] python-psycopg-1.1.21-7.el5.kb.i386.rpm 28-Feb-2008 19:40 123K
Primorec wrote:
I've checked today here
Extras Testing: i386 = http://centos.karan.org/el5/extras/testing/i386/RPMS/ x86_64 Sources
Could not find gnumeric (yet).
Am I looking into the right repository ?
That is indeed the right place - only, I've been shuffing machines and drives around setting up some stuff in the DC. So the next push should have the packages.
Changed thread subject to (hopefully) put requests under the same thread.
Unless I have missed a replacement package, I would like to see gnucash included. I *think* I found it in FC8.
On Sun, 02 Mar 2008 23:13:12 -0800 Bob Taylor bob8221@gmail.com wrote:
Unless I have missed a replacement package, I would like to see gnucash included. I *think* I found it in FC8.
You did:
Available Packages Name : gnucash Arch : x86_64 Version: 2.2.3 Release: 1.fc8 Size : 5.9 M Repo : updates Summary: GnuCash is an application to keep track of your finances Description: GnuCash is a personal finance manager. A check-book like register GUI allows you to enter and track bank accounts, stocks, income and even currency trades. The interface is designed to be simple and easy to use, but is backed with double-entry accounting principles to ensure balanced books.
Frank Cox wrote:
Available Packages Name : gnucash Arch : x86_64 Version: 2.2.3 Release: 1.fc8 Size : 5.9 M Repo : updates
Wrong distro!
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 17:40:26 +0000 Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
Wrong distro!
No. He said that he thought he saw it in F8, meaning that he was unsure if it was actually there or not. I confirmed that it is, indeed, available in F8.
Bob Taylor wrote:
Changed thread subject to (hopefully) put requests under the same thread.
Unless I have missed a replacement package, I would like to see gnucash included. I *think* I found it in FC8.
My buildmachine no longer has the Belgian horde wrecking havoc all over it :D which means that I can have a go at getting a recent gnucash done along with gnumeric for C4/5 today!
- KB
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
Primorec wrote:
I've checked today here
Extras Testing: i386 = http://centos.karan.org/el5/extras/testing/i386/RPMS/ x86_64 Sources
Could not find gnumeric (yet).
Am I looking into the right repository ?
That is indeed the right place - only, I've been shuffing machines and drives around setting up some stuff in the DC. So the next push should have the packages.
The 'gnumeric' problem for the CentOS5.x is solved. There are 2 solutions available. Both of them work. SOLUTION A) (thanks to Michael A.P.) wget http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/i386/epel-release-5-2.noarch.rp... wget http://yellowjacketlinux.fileburst.com/yum/yjl/el5/yjl-repo-1-3.el5_1.yjl.0.... rpm -i epel-release-5-2.noarch.rpm rpm -i yjl-repo-1-3.el5_1.yjl.0.noarch.rpm enable yjl-misc in /etc/yum.repos.d/yjl.repo yum install gnumeric
SOLUTION B) (found via google on Scientific Linux) http://www.mail-archive.com/scientific-linux-users@listserv.fnal.gov/msg0156...
repo file:
$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/pjsl.repo
[pjsl] name=PJ SL rpms baseurl=http://pj.freefaculty.org/ScientificLinux/5/$basearch/ enabled=1
[pjsl-source] name=PJ SL Linux 5 - $basearch - Source baseurl=http://pj.freefaculty.org/ScientificLinux/5/SRPMS enabled=0 #gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL #gpgcheck=1
Good luck
Igor
Hi...
Ran into an interesting issue during the past week, and figured I'd post the issue, and solution here in case it might come in handy for someone else...
The laptop was running, but it was left on with the lid closed for a day or so.. when powered up, the laptop went into a state saying it couldn't find the mounts... hmm.. shouldn't have thought this could happen. figured the drive might screwing up, so i reinstalled FC8.
after a few hours, got everything back.. went and plugged the laptop into a power strip that had a short..!! ouch, saw the same behavior.. got sort of nervous, but thought it should be ok (hopefully!) so after another reinstall, got to really wondering what was really going on... didn't think about it.. the laptop was working.. things were cool.. for a day! and after closing the lid, and then reopening.. after another day or so. saw the same behavior.
here's what i was seeing:
Filesystemtype is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
"VolGroup00" using etadata type lvm2 2 logical volumes in volume group "VolGroup00" now active
VFS: Can't find ext3 filesystem on dev dm-3 mount: error mounting /dev/root on /sysroot as ext3: Invalid argument setuproot: moving /dev failed: No such file or directory setuproot: error mounting /proc: No such file or directory setuproot: error mounting /sys: No such file or directory switchroot: mount failed: No such file or directory
========================================
at this point, talked to a few people, and started thinking that somehow the disk was getting, had gotten corrupted.
so...
started to try to see what the drive had, if anything!
poped in the FC8 rescuedCD, and went to work..
ran the cmds: lvm pvscan lvm vgscan lvm lvscan
since i had installed using the defaults for FC8 LVM, the drive showed that it was basically ok.
went ahead and ran fdisk /dev/sda and saw that i indeed had my two partitions /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2
so at this point..
i did a mkdir /dev/sysimage, followed by a mount /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 /mnt/sysimage
this worked, and got me to a point where i could hopefully fix/repair whatever errs might be on the drive...
i then ran e2fsck -y /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
after a little hope.. and an amount of time as the system did it's thing, it came back saying how many sectors where corrected, etc...
i then rebooted, and the laptop was back up/running as it should!
feel free to add to this if you have useful information, or additional insight that you want to share.
peace.
ok...
my bad. there is an additional step that has to be done tha t i left out. my apologies. once you've found that you do have the lvms with the: lvm pvscan lvm vgscan lvm lvscan
cmds... the lvm(s) might be in an inactive state. if you do a "ls /dev" and you see that you have "/dev/VolGroup00" or something to that effect depending on how you named your lvms... you're ok. if not, then you simply need to activate the lvms by doing: lvm vgchange -ay
this will go ahaead and set the lvm(s) to an active state, where it will then show up under the "/dev" dir...
the rest of the steps i provided should work ok..
thanks..
Hi...
Ran into an interesting issue during the past week, and figured I'd post the issue, and solution here in case it might come in handy for someone else...
The laptop was running, but it was left on with the lid closed for a day or so.. when powered up, the laptop went into a state saying it couldn't find the mounts... hmm.. shouldn't have thought this could happen. figured the drive might screwing up, so i reinstalled FC8.
after a few hours, got everything back.. went and plugged the laptop into a power strip that had a short..!! ouch, saw the same behavior.. got sort of nervous, but thought it should be ok (hopefully!) so after another reinstall, got to really wondering what was really going on... didn't think about it.. the laptop was working.. things were cool.. for a day! and after closing the lid, and then reopening.. after another day or so. saw the same behavior.
here's what i was seeing:
Filesystemtype is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
"VolGroup00" using etadata type lvm2 2 logical volumes in volume group "VolGroup00" now active
VFS: Can't find ext3 filesystem on dev dm-3 mount: error mounting /dev/root on /sysroot as ext3: Invalid argument setuproot: moving /dev failed: No such file or directory setuproot: error mounting /proc: No such file or directory setuproot: error mounting /sys: No such file or directory switchroot: mount failed: No such file or directory
========================================
at this point, talked to a few people, and started thinking that somehow the disk was getting, had gotten corrupted.
so...
started to try to see what the drive had, if anything!
poped in the FC8 rescuedCD, and went to work..
ran the cmds: lvm pvscan lvm vgscan lvm lvscan
since i had installed using the defaults for FC8 LVM, the drive showed that it was basically ok.
went ahead and ran fdisk /dev/sda and saw that i indeed had my two partitions /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2
so at this point..
i did a mkdir /dev/sysimage, followed by a mount /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 /mnt/sysimage
this worked, and got me to a point where i could hopefully fix/repair whatever errs might be on the drive...
i then ran e2fsck -y /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00
after a little hope.. and an amount of time as the system did it's thing, it came back saying how many sectors where corrected, etc...
i then rebooted, and the laptop was back up/running as it should!
feel free to add to this if you have useful information, or additional insight that you want to share.
peace.
-
Bob Taylor -
bruce -
centos＠911networks.com -
Frank Cox -
Karanbir Singh -
Primorec -
Scott Silva