Hi.
There does not seem to be a php53-eaccelerator in standard Centos yum channels, from what I can see. That is a mainstay for us. Has anyone found that any particular php53-eacclerator from other locations play well with it?
Thanks.
Hi. There does not seem to be a php53-eaccelerator in standard Centos yum channels, from what I can see. That is a mainstay for us. Has anyone found that any particular php53-eacclerator from other locations play well with it? Thanks.
Hi Geoff,
I have rebuild the one from remi's repo with some minor tweaks to pull in php53 stuff instead of php. It's not yet in production here but it works in testing... ymmv. Can give you the spec file if you want.
Rainer
ok
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Traut Sent: 13 April 2011 17:57 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] php53 and eacclerator
Hi. There does not seem to be a php53-eaccelerator in standard Centos yum channels, from what I can see. That is a mainstay for us. Has anyone found that any particular php53-eacclerator from other locations play well with it? Thanks.
Hi Geoff,
I have rebuild the one from remi's repo with some minor tweaks to pull in php53 stuff instead of php. It's not yet in production here but it works in testing... ymmv. Can give you the spec file if you want.
Rainer _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi!
If you need you can get php53 source rpm from next URL
http://yum.aclub.net/pub/linux/centos/5/umask/SRPMS/
there is php53 with suhosin patch, php-fpm support, suhosin extension, eaccelerator support etc (see other php* packages).
I'm using this packages on several production servers.
This package requires postgesql84-libs and conflicts with postgresql-libs (in fact 8.3 for centos5).
FYI. yum.aclub.net is my rpm repo, which supported only by me.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Raj kumar raj.k95@gmail.com wrote:
ok
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Traut Sent: 13 April 2011 17:57 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] php53 and eacclerator
Hi. There does not seem to be a php53-eaccelerator in standard Centos yum channels, from what I can see. That is a mainstay for us. Has anyone found that any particular php53-eacclerator from other locations play well with it? Thanks.
Hi Geoff,
I have rebuild the one from remi's repo with some minor tweaks to pull in php53 stuff instead of php. It's not yet in production here but it works in testing... ymmv. Can give you the spec file if you want.
Rainer _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Am 13.04.2011 14:28, schrieb Raj kumar:
ok
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Traut Sent: 13 April 2011 17:57 To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] php53 and eacclerator
Hi. There does not seem to be a php53-eaccelerator in standard Centos yum channels, from what I can see. That is a mainstay for us. Has anyone found that any particular php53-eacclerator from other locations play well with it? Thanks.
Hi Geoff,
I have rebuild the one from remi's repo with some minor tweaks to pull in php53 stuff instead of php. It's not yet in production here but it works in testing... ymmv. Can give you the spec file if you want.
I uploaded the spec here: http://ubliga.de/php-eaccelerator.spec
It's adjusted for RHEL/Centos 5.6 so that it works with stock php53 packages - no need to pull in packages from other repos.
Rainer
I uploaded the spec here: http://ubliga.de/php-eaccelerator.spec
It's adjusted for RHEL/Centos 5.6 so that it works with stock php53 packages - no need to pull in packages from other repos.
Thanks!
We use APC since upgrading to php52 as there weren't any eaccelerator rpms available anymore. Haven't seen much difference. I'd be interested to know if anyone did a comparison.
Kai
-
Geoff Galitz -
Ilyas -- -
Kai Schaetzl -
Rainer Traut -
Raj kumar