If I have a local rpm file, what is the difference between running "rpm -i" and "yum localinstall"?
When I do "rpm -i", I can still see the info via "yum info", so is there a difference?
On 12/30/05, Bowie Bailey Bowie_Bailey@buc.com wrote:
If I have a local rpm file, what is the difference between running "rpm -i" and "yum localinstall"?
When I do "rpm -i", I can still see the info via "yum info", so is there a difference?
Doing rpm -i will not help you solve dependency issues. If the package you're installing requires something you don't have, you'll have to go get it manually. yum removes this headache.
-- Bowie _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-- Jim Perrin System Architect - UIT Ft Gordon & US Army Signal Center
I'm not sure, but yum will certainly download and install dependencies that are available in its package repository. rpm won't.
If you don't have dependencies, it is the same.
Bowie Bailey wrote:
If I have a local rpm file, what is the difference between running "rpm -i" and "yum localinstall"?
When I do "rpm -i", I can still see the info via "yum info", so is there a difference?