So you didn't have any problems on 5.3. I am more interested in those who had problems on 5.3. There where some problems with system stability with some graphic drivers. There was some workaround and I wanted to ask if someone tested if it is still necessary.
BR Janez
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Olaf Mueller daily-planet@istari.dewrote:
Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
anyone tried firefox 3.5 under centos 5.4
Yes, from www.mozilla.com, no rpm. Works great here since CentOS 5.3, now 5.4.
regards Olaf
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I didn't have any problem with the installation.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Janez Kosmrlj postnalista@googlemail.comwrote:
So you didn't have any problems on 5.3. I am more interested in those who had problems on 5.3. There where some problems with system stability with some graphic drivers. There was some workaround and I wanted to ask if someone tested if it is still necessary.
BR Janez
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Olaf Mueller daily-planet@istari.dewrote:
Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
anyone tried firefox 3.5 under centos 5.4
Yes, from www.mozilla.com, no rpm. Works great here since CentOS 5.3, now 5.4.
regards Olaf
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hey
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Janez Kosmrlj postnalista@googlemail.com wrote:
So you didn't have any problems on 5.3. I am more interested in those who had problems on 5.3. There where some problems with system stability with some graphic drivers. There was some workaround and I wanted to ask if someone tested if it is still necessary.
My X just crashed when I visited a few "special" pages. The Newsletter page being one of them. But at the time (2 month ago) there was apparently no way of getting it working so I gave up. I haven't tried it recently though. Try it, maybe your card is not affected.
I used the mharris rpm ;)
Cheers Didi
BR Janez
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Olaf Mueller daily-planet@istari.de wrote:
Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
anyone tried firefox 3.5 under centos 5.4
Yes, from www.mozilla.com, no rpm. Works great here since CentOS 5.3, now 5.4.
regards Olaf
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Did you have any problem on installing firefox?
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Janez Kosmrlj postnalista@googlemail.comwrote:
?
BR
Janez
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Janez Kosmrlj postnalista@googlemail.com wrote:
Works fine for me using rpms (rebuilt from the src.rpms) on http://mharris.ca/
They're basically slightly altered fedora rpms. You have to read the spec to see the build arguments required, but they work fine.
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Jim Perrin wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Janez Kosmrlj postnalista@googlemail.com wrote:
Works fine for me using rpms (rebuilt from the src.rpms) on http://mharris.ca/
They're basically slightly altered fedora rpms. You have to read the spec to see the build arguments required, but they work fine.
and indeed, for people just seeking binaries that archive is mentioned at: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
-- Russ herrold
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 15:35, Jim Perrin jperrin@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Janez Kosmrlj postnalista@googlemail.com wrote:
Works fine for me using rpms (rebuilt from the src.rpms) on http://mharris.ca/
They're basically slightly altered fedora rpms. You have to read the spec to see the build arguments required, but they work fine.
Yes, I can build 3.5.4 from this src.rpm package. But it's failed with 3.5.5 source. Anyone tried this ?
Thanks
-
Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann -
Janez Kosmrlj -
Jim Perrin -
Majian -
Olaf Mueller -
R P Herrold -
Vnpenguin