From: Craig White [mailto:craigwhite@azapple.com]
it's not linking against db4.4 only 4.2 and 4.3 as you can see above. 4.4 was just released and clearly not tested and definitely not recommended. You should note that even the latest 4.3 version isn't recommended for use with openldap but rather 4.2.52+patches.
Hmmm... 4.4.16 is the default download link on the website. I assumed that was the latest stable version.
I was able to get OpenLDAP to compile against db4.3. Any particular reason it isn't recommended?
Bowie
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 12:19, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I was able to get OpenLDAP to compile against db4.3. Any particular reason it isn't recommended?
I see fedora directory server just made the 1.0 release. Might that be a better choice?
http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Main_Page
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 13:01 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 12:19, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I was able to get OpenLDAP to compile against db4.3. Any particular reason it isn't recommended?
I see fedora directory server just made the 1.0 release. Might that be a better choice?
---- I doubt that it would be a better choice but I would agree that it is indeed a choice. One of those things where there isn't a black and white better daemon. This however doesn't answer OP's question.
Craig
Craig White craigwhite@azapple.com wrote:
I doubt that it would be a better choice but I would agree that it is indeed a choice. One of those things where there isn't a black and white better daemon. This however doesn't answer OP's question.
That's why I didn't suggest it. If one's already running OpenLDAP (and has existing schema/data), then another doesn't answer his question by switching LDAP servers.
I resisted those who did until there was enough mis-information/lack-of-clarity, and only in that context on NsDS, Sun One, RHDS/FDS, etc...
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 13:42 -0800, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
Craig White craigwhite@azapple.com wrote:
I doubt that it would be a better choice but I would agree that it is indeed a choice. One of those things where there isn't a black and white better daemon. This however doesn't answer OP's question.
That's why I didn't suggest it. If one's already running OpenLDAP (and has existing schema/data), then another doesn't answer his question by switching LDAP servers.
I resisted those who did until there was enough mis-information/lack-of-clarity, and only in that context on NsDS, Sun One, RHDS/FDS, etc...
---- I'm glad to provide such an opportunity for you.
;-)
Thanks
Craig
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 13:19 -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
From: Craig White [mailto:craigwhite@azapple.com]
it's not linking against db4.4 only 4.2 and 4.3 as you can see above. 4.4 was just released and clearly not tested and definitely not recommended. You should note that even the latest 4.3 version isn't recommended for use with openldap but rather 4.2.52+patches.
Hmmm... 4.4.16 is the default download link on the website. I assumed that was the latest stable version.
I was able to get OpenLDAP to compile against db4.3. Any particular reason it isn't recommended?
---- asking me, you only get my unqualified recollection (performance)
asking the openldap list, you would get qualified responses
Craig
-
Bowie Bailey -
Bryan J. Smith -
Craig White -
Les Mikesell