We are testing some simple low bandwidth video and audio broadcasting using real server and client softwares.
So, for quick check and simplicity, we were plunking along TESTING on an 3.2GHz XP box and I noticed frames were getting dropped on the broadcast just for resizing a window on the screen during the session.
Talk about totally lame...
I know this can be a big deal and start conflicting opinions yet I need some experienced perspective please?
Can anyone chime in on what they use or what they would buy if they were going to have a workstation box for development that could double as test server and have good high speed storage and excellent video and audio etc etc
Im thinking of a box that does audio and video development, can easily handle virtualization, and of course do general work apps plus setting up various server processes for testing whether intranet or internet etc etc
It can be premade like specific dell or hp (please list component choices for clarity)
OR
A hand built box with specific list of components that
Now, I know this has been done in magazines with great expense, and even with lower expense, yet I trust the list more than a magazine that wants to sell me advertising etc
Thanks in advance
- rh
I always look here http://cr.yp.to/hardware/build-20060107.html
He hasn't updated it recently.
But the reasons Dan Bernstein made the choices he did are mostly still vaiid and it's interesting reading.
On 8/9/07, Robert - elists lists07@abbacomm.net wrote:
We are testing some simple low bandwidth video and audio broadcasting using real server and client softwares.
So, for quick check and simplicity, we were plunking along TESTING on an 3.2GHz XP box and I noticed frames were getting dropped on the broadcast just for resizing a window on the screen during the session.
Talk about totally lame...
I know this can be a big deal and start conflicting opinions yet I need some experienced perspective please?
Can anyone chime in on what they use or what they would buy if they were going to have a workstation box for development that could double as test server and have good high speed storage and excellent video and audio etc etc
Im thinking of a box that does audio and video development, can easily handle virtualization, and of course do general work apps plus setting up various server processes for testing whether intranet or internet etc etc
It can be premade like specific dell or hp (please list component choices for clarity)
OR
A hand built box with specific list of components that
Now, I know this has been done in magazines with great expense, and even with lower expense, yet I trust the list more than a magazine that wants to sell me advertising etc
Thanks in advance
- rh
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 09:42 -0700, Robert - elists wrote:
We are testing some simple low bandwidth video and audio broadcasting using real server and client softwares.
So, for quick check and simplicity, we were plunking along TESTING on an 3.2GHz XP box and I noticed frames were getting dropped on the broadcast just for resizing a window on the screen during the session.
Talk about totally lame...
I know this can be a big deal and start conflicting opinions yet I need some experienced perspective please?
Can anyone chime in on what they use or what they would buy if they were going to have a workstation box for development that could double as test server and have good high speed storage and excellent video and audio etc etc
Im thinking of a box that does audio and video development, can easily handle virtualization, and of course do general work apps plus setting up various server processes for testing whether intranet or internet etc etc
It can be premade like specific dell or hp (please list component choices for clarity)
OR
A hand built box with specific list of components that
Now, I know this has been done in magazines with great expense, and even with lower expense, yet I trust the list more than a magazine that wants to sell me advertising etc
Thanks in advance
- rh
Wow, that list of things you want to run on it sound like it could be pretty intensive at times. Your budget for this will definitely affect what you can stuff into this new box, but I will go from the stand point of being reasonable yet you have sufficient funds to acquire anything you need. For audio/video dev, you will want SAS drives, striped for increased throughput, and if you *need* data integrity on that box (i.e. hard to or impossible to backup or just plain paranoid) you'll want mirroring. So that means 4x146GB SAS drives, 146GB as raw video tends to get big in size and you'll have ~292GB of usable space. Depending on how big the video files are that you will be working with, you'll want 2GB-4GB of RAM. I'd go with a Xeon processor, if only so that you'll have a higher available L2 Cache (4MB), although some Core 2 Duo chips do have a fair amount of L2. What kind of virtualization were you thinking of doing (VMware, Xen, QEMU, etc.)?
This might be a good place to start tweaking the specs: http://h71016.www7.hp.com/dstore/MiddleFrame.asp?page=config&ProductLine...
Wow, that list of things you want to run on it sound like it could be pretty intensive at times. Your budget for this will definitely affect what you can stuff into this new box, but I will go from the stand point of being reasonable yet you have sufficient funds to acquire anything you need. For audio/video dev, you will want SAS drives, striped for increased throughput, and if you *need* data integrity on that box (i.e. hard to or impossible to backup or just plain paranoid) you'll want mirroring. So that means 4x146GB SAS drives, 146GB as raw video tends to get big in size and you'll have ~292GB of usable space. Depending on how big the video files are that you will be working with, you'll want 2GB-4GB of RAM. I'd go with a Xeon processor, if only so that you'll have a higher available L2 Cache (4MB), although some Core 2 Duo chips do have a fair amount of L2. What kind of virtualization were you thinking of doing (VMware, Xen, QEMU, etc.)?
This might be a good place to start tweaking the specs: http://h71016.www7.hp.com/dstore/MiddleFrame.asp?page=config&ProductLine... =433&FamilyId=2437&BaseId=23358&oi=E9CED&BEID=19701&SBLID=
-- Timothy Selivanow timothys@easystreet.com
We use a lot of hp servers...
The idea here is that I want to put centos on the machine, use it mainly as a high powered workstation with a good video card and I need rock solid functional reliability as a desktop workstation.
Im thinking in terms of the hardware, yet im concerned about the video drivers etc.
I am not an expert on video cards and video drivers in the linux community.
Obviously if it is beefy enough it will handle basic server testing chores too.
Thanks for the input... more? Others?
:-)
- rh
Robert - elists wrote:
We use a lot of hp servers...
The idea here is that I want to put centos on the machine, use it mainly as a high powered workstation with a good video card and I need rock solid functional reliability as a desktop workstation.
Im thinking in terms of the hardware, yet im concerned about the video drivers etc.
I am not an expert on video cards and video drivers in the linux community.
Obviously if it is beefy enough it will handle basic server testing chores too.
Thanks for the input... more? Others?
I've been pretty impressed with IBM 3550's compared to earlier versions but they are noisy 1U units like you would probably use as a production server and you don't want to sit near it. Have you considered running X remotely from a different desktop workstation instead of dealing with the video on the server itself? Or even freenx with the NX client on your choice of linux/windows/mac workstations.
Just make sure you get a CPU type that can run VMware 64 bit guests if you want to be able to test everything (not all 64-bit processors can).
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 13:40 -0700, Robert - elists wrote:
I am not an expert on video cards and video drivers in the linux community.
Obviously if it is beefy enough it will handle basic server testing chores too.
Thanks for the input... more? Others?
www.thinkmate.com
They have some inexpensive BTO boxes. I've been using them since they were SAG Electronics, and never had any issues.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 09:42:22AM -0700, Robert - elists wrote:
Can anyone chime in on what they use or what they would buy if they were going to have a workstation box for development that could double as test server and have good high speed storage and excellent video and audio etc etc
Im thinking of a box that does audio and video development, can easily handle virtualization, and of course do general work apps plus setting up various server processes for testing whether intranet or internet etc etc
It can be premade like specific dell or hp (please list component choices for clarity)
I've got a box like that. At least I think this is what you need, without some real data on your video/audio needs.
HP DC5750 (RK466AW#AC4)
and then added a nice NVidia video card.
I have been happy ever since. You might also want to add some memory, since it comes with 1GB, thou.
This particular model (RK466AW#AC4) might not be avaliable at USA. So, looking at the HP site, I would say it is a little better than the RT860UT model you will find there.
Best Regards,
- -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)