Hi, i was wondering what is the status of 4.7 Thank you, Best regards, Adrian
+2
Seems Redhat already released 4.7 http://www.press.redhat.com/2008/07/24/red-hat-enterprise-linux-47-released-...
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 1:08 PM, Oliver Schulze L. oliver@samera.com.py wrote:
+1
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
Hi, i was wondering what is the status of 4.7 Thank you, Best regards, Adrian
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
--- El sáb 30-ago-08, Adrian Sevcenco Adrian.Sevcenco@cern.ch escribió: De:: Adrian Sevcenco Adrian.Sevcenco@cern.ch Asunto: [CentOS] CentOS 4.7 status A: CentOS@centos.org Fecha: sábado, 30 agosto, 2008, 8:37 pm
Hi, i was wondering what is the status of 4.7 Most important, what is the status of the last packages updated by the upstream provider? one of them a new kernel which i don't see on the mirror repositories.
Thank you, Best regards, Adrian _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
__________________________________________________ Correo Yahoo! Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis! Regístrate ya - http://correo.yahoo.com.mx/
on 8-30-2008 6:37 PM Adrian Sevcenco spake the following:
Hi, i was wondering what is the status of 4.7 Thank you, Best regards, Adrian
4.7 was delayed so the buildservers could get 5.2 ready. 4.7 is probably in the queue now, but it takes a while because CentOS doesn't have a million dollar hardware budget, and has to schedule things to best use the hardware available.
When it is ready and synced to the mirrors, it will be announced.
where can we get ISOs? I can test for VirtualBox atleast. If there is a problem I will submit a bug.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Scott Silva ssilva@sgvwater.com wrote:
on 8-30-2008 6:37 PM Adrian Sevcenco spake the following:
Hi, i was wondering what is the status of 4.7 Thank you, Best regards, Adrian
4.7 was delayed so the buildservers could get 5.2 ready. 4.7 is probably in the queue now, but it takes a while because CentOS doesn't have a million dollar hardware budget, and has to schedule things to best use the hardware available.
When it is ready and synced to the mirrors, it will be announced.
-- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
4.7 was delayed so the buildservers could get 5.2 ready. 4.7 is probably in the queue now, but it takes a while because CentOS doesn't have a million dollar hardware budget, and has to schedule things to best use the hardware available.
What changes will be in CentOS 4.7 vs. 4.6? I would really like to see NCQ support on SATA drives. Then again some have said it does not help much. I have an email server that is somewhat disk I/O bound.
Matt
Matt wrote:
What changes will be in CentOS 4.7 vs. 4.6?
http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS4.7
Cheers,
Ralph
Scott Silva napsal(a):
4.7 was delayed so the buildservers could get 5.2 ready. 4.7 is probably in the queue now, but it takes a while because CentOS doesn't have a million dollar hardware budget, and has to schedule things to best use the hardware available.
When it is ready and synced to the mirrors, it will be announced.
Glad to see some info and not only typical "when it's done it's done". We are enterprise distro, so I guess we should inform the community on progress. Especially in that case, when translators were warn a month ago to prepare RN soon. Not mentioning that 4.x boxes are not receiving updates/security fixes due to. So thanks for the info Scott. David Hrbáč
David Hrbáè wrote:
Glad to see some info and not only typical "when it's done it's done". We are enterprise distro, so I guess we should inform the community on
We = RHEL?
Last I checked CentOS wasn't supported by most of the enterprise things out there(though sometimes you can get lucky).
If someone is that eager to get the latest code they should be using RHEL. As for me I probably won't bother with 4.7 until early next year. I still have systems running RHEL 4 update 1 that I need to deal with..(stuff I inherited when I took a new job earlier this year).
nate
nate wrote:
David Hrbáè wrote:
Glad to see some info and not only typical "when it's done it's done". We are enterprise distro, so I guess we should inform the community on
We = RHEL?
We == CentOS.
Last I checked CentOS wasn't supported by most of the enterprise things out there(though sometimes you can get lucky).
It still is an Enterprise Distribution in terms of support time frames.
Cheers,
Ralph
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Scott Silva ssilva@sgvwater.com wrote:
on 8-30-2008 6:37 PM Adrian Sevcenco spake the following:
Hi, i was wondering what is the status of 4.7 Thank you, Best regards, Adrian
4.7 was delayed so the buildservers could get 5.2 ready. 4.7 is probably in the queue now, but it takes a while because CentOS doesn't have a million dollar hardware budget, and has to schedule things to best use the hardware available.
When it is ready and synced to the mirrors, it will be announced.
The status of CentOS 4.7 release can be tracked in this forum thread:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id...
Akemi / toracat
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
Hi, i was wondering what is the status of 4.7 Thank you, Best regards,
We are working on getting 4.7 out right now, if things goto plan, and enough mirrors are seeded we will announce and release the torrents this Friday/Saturday so 5th or 6th.
If things get delayed beyond that, I'll post an email to this thread.
--- On Wed, 3/9/08, Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org wrote:
From: Karanbir Singh mail-lists@karan.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 4.7 status To: "CentOS mailing list" centos@centos.org Date: Wednesday, 3 September, 2008, 4:35 PM We are working on getting 4.7 out right now, if things goto plan, and enough mirrors are seeded we will announce and release the torrents this Friday/Saturday so 5th or 6th.
If things get delayed beyond that, I'll post an email to this thread.
-- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Any update on this situation? The last security updates for 4.6 were released in July so it looks as though the 4X branch has ground to a halt.
Thanks, Josh.
josh donovan wrote:
Any update on this situation? The last security updates for 4.6 were released in July so it looks as though the 4X branch has ground to a halt.
The 4.7 release is syncing out to external mirrors right now, we should have enough done for release by Monday night ( for i386/x86_64 )
Josh Donovan wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
The 4.7 release is syncing out to external mirrors right now, we should have enough done for release by Monday night ( for i386/x86_64 )
Any update?
4.7 is still syncing to the mirrors (dvds are missing), but we are pushing towards a release *really* soon now.
Ralph
on 9-12-2008 2:54 AM Josh Donovan spake the following:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
The 4.7 release is syncing out to external mirrors right now, we should have enough done for release by Monday night ( for i386/x86_64 )
Any update?
Starting to sound like when my children were younger and we went on a trip.
"Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" :-D
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Scott Silva ssilva@sgvwater.com wrote:
on 9-12-2008 2:54 AM Josh Donovan spake the following:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
The 4.7 release is syncing out to external mirrors right now, we should have enough done for release by Monday night ( for i386/x86_64 )
Any update?
Starting to sound like when my children were younger and we went on a trip.
"Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" :-D
They should have stuck with the "when it's ready" response instead of telling us the "5th or 6th", then "Monday night". They created greater anticipation by suggesting an actual time line. And greater frustration by missing it. "When it's ready" always worked for me in the past, but since they gave a date this time, I've been obsessively checking the mirrors looking for the release. It's human nature.
Scott Silva ssilva@sgvwater.com wrote:
They should have stuck with the "when it's ready" response instead of telling us the "5th or 6th", then "Monday night". They created greater anticipation by suggesting an actual time line. And greater frustration by missing it. "When it's ready" always worked for me in the past, but since they gave a date this time, I've been obsessively checking the mirrors looking for the release. It's human nature.
Agreed! If people on the mailing list are frigid, then we would have a big problem. If one or two are waiting for the updates then the list "is live". :-)
Thanks, Josh
They should have stuck with the "when it's ready" response instead of telling us the "5th or 6th", then "Monday night". They created greater anticipation by suggesting an actual time line. And greater frustration by missing it. "When it's ready" always worked for me in the past, but since they gave a date this time, I've been obsessively checking the mirrors looking for the release. It's human nature.
And when they said "When it's ready" others complained.
I'm sure they anticipated releasing on those dates, and only gave them out to appease the others that asked. I think the CentOS admins do very well for an "all volunteer army"! It has to be hard to run an international organization on donations and free time.
Scott Silva wrote:
on 9-12-2008 2:54 AM Josh Donovan spake the following:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
The 4.7 release is syncing out to external mirrors right now, we should have enough done for release by Monday night ( for i386/x86_64 )
Any update?
Starting to sound like when my children were younger and we went on a trip.
"Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" :-D
CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
ROFL!!!!
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Scott Silva ssilva@sgvwater.com wrote:
Starting to sound like when my children were younger and we went on a trip.
"Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" "Are we there yet?"
"NO" :-D
You haven't tried the Shrek trick? After the first ten of "Are we there yet?" "NO", do this:
"Are we there yet?" "Yes." "REALLY?" "NO!!!"
;^)
mhr
on 9-12-2008 12:13 PM MHR spake the following:
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Scott Silva ssilva-m4n3GYAQT2lWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org wrote:
Starting to sound like when my children were younger and we went on a trip.
You haven't tried the Shrek trick? After the first ten of "Are we there yet?" "NO", do this:
"Are we there yet?" "Yes." "REALLY?" "NO!!!"
My youngest is now 18, so I will have to remember that one for the grandkids (whenever that happens!)
-
Adrian Sevcenco -
Akemi Yagi -
David Hrbáč -
Jeff -
josh donovan -
Karanbir Singh -
Mag Gam -
Matt -
MHR -
nate -
Oliver Schulze L. -
Ralph Angenendt -
Ramon Nieto -
Scott Silva -
William Warren