I will be out of the office starting 06/25/2009 and will not return until 07/06/2009.
In my absence please contact Dave Lowenstein or Ted Wojcik for UNIX/Linux technical issues. Please contact Kim Richardson for management issues.
Thanks, Ted
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Ted_Schnitzer@vrtx.com wrote:
I will be out of the office starting 06/25/2009 and will not return until 07/06/2009.
In my absence please contact Dave Lowenstein or Ted Wojcik for UNIX/Linux technical issues. Please contact Kim Richardson for management issues.
Thanks, Ted
Hopefully, the owner of the mailing list will see Ted's email and delete Ted from the list, or stop sending the list to him and he can reactivate when he returns to the office. People should not subscribe to mailing lists with an email account they use an auto responder on.
Lanny Marcus wrote:
Hopefully, the owner of the mailing list will see Ted's email and delete Ted from the list, or stop sending the list to him and he can reactivate when he returns to the office. People should not subscribe to mailing lists with an email account they use an auto responder on.
I don't see any problem with *one* stray auto responder message.
Ralph
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Ralph Angenendtra+centos@br-online.de wrote:
Lanny Marcus wrote:
Hopefully, the owner of the mailing list will see Ted's email and delete Ted from the list, or stop sending the list to him and he can reactivate when he returns to the office. People should not subscribe to mailing lists with an email account they use an auto responder on.
I don't see any problem with *one* stray auto responder message.
I do not see any problem with one message either. But, if every time he receives a message, his system sends an email, that will get old. Hopefully, he is subscribed to the Mailing LIst Digest and not to every message!
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:46:06 -0500 Lanny Marcus wrote:
I do not see any problem with one message either. But, if every time he receives a message, his system sends an email, that will get old.
Smart autoresponders keep track of where they have responded and don't send more than one msg to the same person. Of course, it's uncertain if it uses the "From" or "Reply-to" for that test.
Julian Thomas wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:46:06 -0500 Lanny Marcus wrote:
I do not see any problem with one message either. But, if every time he receives a message, his system sends an email, that will get old.
Smart autoresponders keep track of where they have responded and don't send more than one msg to the same person. Of course, it's uncertain if it uses the "From" or "Reply-to" for that test.
and even smarter ones ignore messages with
Precedence: list
in the headers. oh well.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Julian Thomasjt@jt-mj.net wrote:
Smart autoresponders keep track of where they have responded and don't send more than one msg to the same person. Of course, it's uncertain if it uses the "From" or "Reply-to" for that test.
So one autoresponder message, and it generates 5 replies from people.... Perhaps we need to rethink priorities a bit :-P
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Jim Perrinjperrin@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Julian Thomasjt@jt-mj.net wrote:
Smart autoresponders keep track of where they have responded and don't send more than one msg to the same person. Of course, it's uncertain if it uses the "From" or "Reply-to" for that test.
So one autoresponder message, and it generates 5 replies from people.... Perhaps we need to rethink priorities a bit :-P
Killjoy!
:-)
mhr
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Julian Thomasjt@jt-mj.net wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:46:06 -0500 Lanny Marcus wrote:
I do not see any problem with one message either. But, if every time he receives a message, his system sends an email, that will get old.
Smart autoresponders keep track of where they have responded and don't send more than one msg to the same person. Of course, it's uncertain if it uses the "From" or "Reply-to" for that test.
If they only send one message, that's very nice. :-)