-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Olaf Greve Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 3:17 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Apache, MySQL, and PHP
Hi,
I have set up this combination on various platforms, including Windows, FreeBSD, RHEL and CentOS and I must say that by far the easiest was CentOS.
Now, how is this any different than what you would do on RHEL? Seeing as Cent is based on it, it would be identical.
Hi Mark,
Now, how is this any different than what you would do on RHEL? Seeing as Cent is based on it, it would be identical.
The differences were probably in the fact that the RHEL installation I made was on RHEL 3, and the CentOS one was a 4 version. Initially I had to make sure the extra channel was added to the subscriptions. Just today I installed it for RHEL 4 and that seemed pretty much identical.
The remaining differences will probably have been in the chosen base installation, requiring some packages to be added that were already installed in the other...
Cheers! Olafo
On the subject of PHP, what's the story with the recent PHP security issues: http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;97355834;fp;16;fpid;0
PHP released an update on 31 March to resolve these problems apparently but there doesn't appear to have been any update to the CentOS packages...
-Simon
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Simon Garner wrote:
On the subject of PHP, what's the story with the recent PHP security issues: http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;97355834;fp;16;fpid;0
PHP released an update on 31 March to resolve these problems apparently but there doesn't appear to have been any update to the CentOS packages...
Exchangeable Image file format (EXIF) specification bug: this was addressed some time ago
- Russ Herold
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 12:17 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Simon Garner wrote:
On the subject of PHP, what's the story with the recent PHP security issues: http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;97355834;fp;16;fpid;0
PHP released an update on 31 March to resolve these problems apparently but there doesn't appear to have been any update to the CentOS packages...
Exchangeable Image file format (EXIF) specification bug: this was addressed some time ago
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-032.html
is from feb 15
(that is the last update from RH for php for CentOS-4)
Looking at php.net and that article, I can't tell if they are fixed or not.
What we need is the bug numbers for the flaws ... then we can see if they are fixed. I can tell you that both CentOS-3 and CentOS-4 have the latest php patches released by redhat.
On 22/04/2005 4:35 a.m., Johnny Hughes wrote:
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 12:17 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Simon Garner wrote:
On the subject of PHP, what's the story with the recent PHP security issues: http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;97355834;fp;16;fpid;0
PHP released an update on 31 March to resolve these problems apparently but there doesn't appear to have been any update to the CentOS packages...
Exchangeable Image file format (EXIF) specification bug: this was addressed some time ago
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-032.html
is from feb 15
(that is the last update from RH for php for CentOS-4)
Ah OK, cool then. Looks like the EXIF bug was fixed in RHEL3 on Dec 12 as well.
-Simon
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 09:57 +1200, Simon Garner wrote:
Exchangeable Image file format (EXIF) specification bug: this was addressed some time ago
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-032.html
is from feb 15
(that is the last update from RH for php for CentOS-4)
Ah OK, cool then. Looks like the EXIF bug was fixed in RHEL3 on Dec 12 as well.
Actually, they're not the same exif bugs.
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=154021 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=154025
Marc.