I like better Bacula ...
Personal I have Bacula ... configure to backup mac, windows, and linux servers ...
Gabe
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 9:53 AM To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Alan McKay Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 3:01 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
BackupPC over here - very happy with it for Linux and Windoze, at home and
work
My google searches would have me believe that Amanda is the more popular choice for backup on linux. On this list it seems Backuppc is. Strange... ;-) -- /Sorin
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Gabriel Rosca Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 4:09 PM To: 'CentOS mailing list' Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
I like better Bacula ...
Personal I have Bacula ... configure to backup mac, windows, and linux servers ...
Isn't Bacula payware?
On 1/13/2010 9:08 AM, Gabriel Rosca wrote:
My google searches would have me believe that Amanda is the more popular choice for backup on linux. On this list it seems Backuppc is. Strange... ;-)
Amanda is good for tape, and has a nice feature of being able to estimate the sizes of full and incremental runs ahead of time and make adjustments to make them all fit on the available tape. It can save to disk but doesn't do any pooling. Backuppc is mostly designed for online backups. It can archive tar images out to tape but it's an afterthought and not great at it. Both are pretty much 'set up and forget' programs although with amanda you do have to swap the tape every day.
-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of Les Mikesell Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 4:57 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup server
On 1/13/2010 9:08 AM, Gabriel Rosca wrote:
My google searches would have me believe that Amanda is the more popular choice for backup on linux. On this list it seems Backuppc is. Strange... ;-)
Amanda is good for tape, and has a nice feature of being able to estimate the sizes of full and incremental runs ahead of time and make adjustments to make them all fit on the available tape. It can save to disk but doesn't do any pooling. Backuppc is mostly designed for online backups. It can archive tar images out to tape but it's an afterthought and not great at it. Both are pretty much 'set up and forget' programs although with amanda you do have to swap the tape every day.
Aha! Online backups is what we use otherwise for Windows here. Seems like Backuppc is really the way to here. Thanks!
FWIW, we used tapes a handful of years back but it was just too much data to transfer, and there was no budget to get an eight-tape-robot, so we opted for an online homebrew hd-based solution. That has worked ever since. I'm very happy with that.
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Gabriel Rosca wrote:
I like better Bacula ...
Personal I have Bacula ... configure to backup mac, windows, and linux servers ...
+1
We back up the same mix with Bacula: Linux, Mac, Windows.
We're still using tape for off-site backups, which bacula handles quite well. I would probably revisit my software choice if I started using only HD-based backups.