On 04/04/2011 08:41 AM Sorin Srbu wrote:

...

-----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces@centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces@centos.org] On Behalf Of ken Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 2:02 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] about:plugins <-Re: interview request for ppl who have Shockwave/.Firefox working

Under "Tools..." I have "Adobe Reader 9.3", "Adobe Reader 9.4" (temporarily disabled due to testing), "Helix DNA Plugin: RealPlayer G2 Plug-in Compatible", "NPAPI Plugins Wrapper 1.3.0", and "Shockwave Flash 10 0 r153", that's all.

Now looking at about:plugins under "Shockwave Flash" it says:

File: nswrapper_32_32.libflashplayer.so Version: Shockwave Flash 10.2 r153

So to your question, the evidence seems to be saying that, yes, Shockwave is the same as Flash, at least on Linux. Or do you see something different?

Well, kinda' different over here, at least on Firefox4 running on WinXP.

Shockwave Flash File: NPSWF32.dll Shockwave Flash 10.2 r152

Shockwave for Director File: np32dsw.dll Adobe Shockwave for Director Netscape plug-in, version 11.5.8.612

Some differences are expected I guess, platform-wise. Just wasn't sure if Shockwave and Flash were the same thing. Will be quiet now. 8-)

Well, this tells us that XP users are getting a higher version than us Linux folks. But we can't really get anything more than that from what XP tells us... or?