Dear All,
Currently using RHEL6 Linux and Kernel Version is 2.6.32-71.el6.i686 and DRBD Version is 8.3.10
DRBD is build from source and Configured DRBD with 2 Node testing with Simplex Setup Server 1 : 192.168.13.131 IP Address and hostname is primary Server 2 : 192.168.13.132 IP Address and hostname is secondary
Finally found that drbd0, drbd1 mount failed problem
*Found some error messages in "dmesg"*
block drbd0: role( Secondary -> Primary ) block drbd1: role( Secondary -> Primary ) EXT4-fs (drbd0): bad geometry: block count 5242880 exceeds size of device (5242711 blocks) EXT4-fs (drbd1): bad geometry: block count 2621440 exceeds size of device (2621351 blocks)
The drbd is working fine and is output as below
[root@primary ~]# cat /proc/drbd version: 8.3.10 (api:88/proto:86-96) GIT-hash: 5c0b0469666682443d4785d90a2c603378f9017b build byroot@primary.mydomain.com, 2011-03-22 11:27:11 0: cs:WFConnection ro:Primary/Unknown ds:UpToDate/DUnknown C r----s ns:0 nr:0 dw:0 dr:677 al:0 bm:0 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0 ep:1 wo:b oos:20970844 1: cs:WFConnection ro:Primary/Unknown ds:UpToDate/DUnknown C r----s ns:0 nr:0 dw:0 dr:1009 al:0 bm:0 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0 ep:1 wo:b oos:10485404 [root@primary ~]#
I have search and findout the same problem and its solved (links as below) http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2009-October/012812.html
But in my case the problem is not solved (changed the meta-disk internal as flexible-meta-disk internal and tested)
The same as working in ext3 filesystem and its not working in ext4 filesystem.
Please find attached primary.zip file contains message log files and drbd configuration file for more analysis.
I don't know what is the problem and Can some one throw light on this peculiar problem
Please replay me ASAP.
Thanks in Advance
--Regards, S.Balaji
On 03/23/11 3:05 AM, Balaji wrote:
Dear All,
Currently using RHEL6 Linux and Kernel Version is 2.6.32-71.el6.i686 and DRBD Version is 8.3.10
I don't know what is the problem and Can some one throw light on this peculiar problem
Please replay me ASAP.
the problem is, thats a RED HAT system, not a CENTOS system. Try Red Hat Support.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:07 AM, John R Pierce pierce@hogranch.com wrote:
On 03/23/11 3:05 AM, Balaji wrote:
Dear All,
Currently using RHEL6 Linux and Kernel Version is 2.6.32-71.el6.i686 and DRBD Version is 8.3.10
I don't know what is the problem and Can some one throw light on this peculiar problem
Please replay me ASAP.
the problem is, thats a RED HAT system, not a CENTOS system. Try Red Hat Support.
Hehe, good luck with RED HAT support and "DRBD is build from source".
centos-bounces@centos.org wrote:
On 03/23/11 3:05 AM, Balaji wrote:
Dear All,
Currently using RHEL6 Linux and Kernel Version is
2.6.32-71.el6.i686 and DRBD Version is 8.3.10
We're pretty much unable to help because yours is a RHEL6 system, we're stuck at RHEL5.5 until our team gets RHEL6 == CentOS6 out the door. So, we'd LOVE to be able to help! Honest! We just can't.
Did you do a clean install of RHEL6, or did you instead upgrade from RHEL5.5 or 5.6? If the latter, if you're somehow using the previous version NTFS tools, that might cause your current problem.
I don't know what is the problem and Can some one throw light on this peculiar problem
Please replay me ASAP.
the problem is, thats a RED HAT system, not a CENTOS system. Try Red Hat Support.
That was a perfect example of the "go away" answers I've seen on this list too many times.
Insert spiffy .sig here: Life is complex: it has both real and imaginary parts.
//me ******************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated**
On Mar 23, 2011, at 6:05 AM, Balaji balajisundar@midascomm.com wrote:
Dear All,
Currently using RHEL6 Linux and Kernel Version is 2.6.32-71.el6.i686 and DRBD Version is 8.3.10
DRBD is build from source and Configured DRBD with 2 Node testing with Simplex Setup Server 1 : 192.168.13.131 IP Address and hostname is primary Server 2 : 192.168.13.132 IP Address and hostname is secondary
Finally found that drbd0, drbd1 mount failed problem
Found some error messages in "dmesg"
block drbd0: role( Secondary -> Primary ) block drbd1: role( Secondary -> Primary ) EXT4-fs (drbd0): bad geometry: block count 5242880 exceeds size of device (5242711 blocks) EXT4-fs (drbd1): bad geometry: block count 2621440 exceeds size of device (2621351 blocks)
The drbd is working fine and is output as below
[root@primary ~]# cat /proc/drbd version: 8.3.10 (api:88/proto:86-96) GIT-hash: 5c0b0469666682443d4785d90a2c603378f9017b build by root@primary.mydomain.com, 2011-03-22 11:27:11 0: cs:WFConnection ro:Primary/Unknown ds:UpToDate/DUnknown C r----s ns:0 nr:0 dw:0 dr:677 al:0 bm:0 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0 ep:1 wo:b oos:20970844 1: cs:WFConnection ro:Primary/Unknown ds:UpToDate/DUnknown C r----s ns:0 nr:0 dw:0 dr:1009 al:0 bm:0 lo:0 pe:0 ua:0 ap:0 ep:1 wo:b oos:10485404 [root@primary ~]#
I have search and findout the same problem and its solved (links as below) http://lists.linbit.com/pipermail/drbd-user/2009-October/012812.html
But in my case the problem is not solved (changed the meta-disk internal as flexible-meta-disk internal and tested)
The same as working in ext3 filesystem and its not working in ext4 filesystem.
Please find attached primary.zip file contains message log files and drbd configuration file for more analysis.
I don't know what is the problem and Can some one throw light on this peculiar problem
Please replay me ASAP.
Thanks in Advance
I would take this to the drbd list.
-Ross
centos-bounces@centos.org wrote:
On Mar 23, 2011, at 6:05 AM, Balaji balajisundar@midascomm.com wrote: Dear All,
Currently using RHEL6 Linux and Kernel Version is 2.6.32-71.el6.i686 and DRBD Version is 8.3.10
DRBD is build from source and Configured DRBD with 2 Finally found that drbd0, drbd1 mount failed problem
Found some error messages in "dmesg"
block drbd0: role( Secondary -> Primary ) block drbd1: role( Secondary -> Primary ) EXT4-fs (drbd0): bad geometry: block count 5242880 exceeds size of device (5242711 blocks) EXT4-fs (drbd1): bad geometry: block count 2621440 exceeds size of device (2621351 blocks) The same as working in ext3 filesystem and its not working in ext4 filesystem.
I would take this to the drbd list.
-Ross
Since it works with ext3, and drdb isn't complaining, EXT4 is (disregard my previous NTFS blather) this seems to be an ext4 problem.
Insert spiffy .sig here: Life is complex: it has both real and imaginary parts.
//me ******************************************************************* This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses. www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated**
-
Balaji -
Brunner, Brian T. -
John R Pierce -
Lucian -
Ross Walker