Greetings,

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:32 PM, A. Kirillovnevis2us@infoline.su wrote:

Hi all,

Are there any current plans to integrate MRG Realtime into CentOS project?

Is the source of MRG open at all?

I was under the impression that it is one of those RH proprietary available thru RHN.

Thanks and Regards

Rajagopal

I've recently switched to the latest rt kernel available from http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/kernel-rt And one of the two problems I'm having with this new kernel is that the logs have been flooded with nagios alerts which indicate high percentage (50-60) of packet loss when pinging localhost. The problem shows up several hours after the system reboot.

The problem also shows up with the latest kernel-rt-2.6.24.7-132 and seems to be triggered by scheduled cron jobs. That's probably the only time when this system might be under any significant load. Below are the relevant excerpts from /var/log/messages indicating when the system booted into which kernel and the first 10 ping alerts after system reboot.

Aug 28 20:03:40 angara kernel: Linux version 2.6.24.7-65.el5rt.centos

Aug 29 02:12:54 PING CRITICAL - Packet loss = 60%, RTA = 0.13 ms Aug 29 02:13:44 PING WARNING - Packet loss = 44%, RTA = 0.09 ms Aug 29 02:14:54 PING WARNING - Packet loss = 54%, RTA = 0.08 ms Aug 29 02:15:45 PING WARNING - Packet loss = 44%, RTA = 0.09 ms Aug 29 03:10:54 PING CRITICAL - Packet loss = 70%, RTA = 0.11 ms Aug 29 03:20:46 PING WARNING - Packet loss = 44%, RTA = 0.09 ms Aug 29 03:30:56 PING CRITICAL - Packet loss = 72%, RTA = 0.09 ms Aug 29 03:35:45 PING WARNING - Packet loss = 44%, RTA = 0.12 ms Aug 29 03:40:44 PING OK - Packet loss = 16%, RTA = 0.10 ms Aug 29 03:45:44 PING WARNING - Packet loss = 50%, RTA = 0.09 ms ...

Aug 29 11:30:56 angara kernel: Linux version 2.6.24.7-65.el5rt.centos

Aug 31 03:43:13 PING WARNING - Packet loss = 28%, RTA = 0.10 ms Aug 31 03:44:13 PING WARNING - Packet loss = 37%, RTA = 0.10 ms Aug 31 03:45:23 PING WARNING - Packet loss = 54%, RTA = 0.08 ms Aug 31 03:46:23 PING CRITICAL - Packet loss = 60%, RTA = 0.12 ms Aug 31 03:51:13 PING WARNING - Packet loss = 44%, RTA = 0.10 ms Aug 31 04:31:23 PING CRITICAL - Packet loss = 60%, RTA = 0.09 ms Aug 31 04:41:14 PING WARNING - Packet loss = 50%, RTA = 0.11 ms Aug 31 06:16:13 PING OK - Packet loss = 16%, RTA = 0.11 ms Aug 31 06:21:13 PING WARNING - Packet loss = 44%, RTA = 0.10 ms Aug 31 06:22:13 PING WARNING - Packet loss = 50%, RTA = 0.10 ms ...

Sep 3 23:44:20 angara kernel: Linux version 2.6.24.7-132.el5.local

Sep 5 04:19:53 PING WARNING - Packet loss = 50%, RTA = 0.14 ms Sep 5 04:21:01 PING CRITICAL - Packet loss = 60%, RTA = 0.10 ms Sep 5 04:21:51 PING WARNING - Packet loss = 28%, RTA = 0.12 ms Sep 5 04:22:56 PING WARNING - Packet loss = 50%, RTA = 0.11 ms Sep 5 04:28:01 PING CRITICAL - Packet loss = 80%, RTA = 0.11 ms Sep 5 04:32:53 PING WARNING - Packet loss = 44%, RTA = 0.10 ms Sep 5 04:37:51 PING OK - Packet loss = 16%, RTA = 0.12 ms Sep 5 04:42:51 PING WARNING - Packet loss = 50%, RTA = 0.11 ms Sep 5 04:44:02 PING CRITICAL - Packet loss = 60%, RTA = 0.09 ms Sep 5 04:45:01 PING CRITICAL - Packet loss = 70%, RTA = 0.10 ms ...

When it happens the pattern of ping failures remains basically the same until the system reboots.

# ping -n -c10 localhost PING localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.074 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.075 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.074 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.097 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=0.067 ms

--- localhost.localdomain ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 5 received, 50% packet loss, time 9004ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.067/0.077/0.097/0.012 ms

Interestingly enough flood pings yeild much better results.

# ping -nf -c10000 localhost PING localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data. ....... --- localhost.localdomain ping statistics --- 10000 packets transmitted, 9993 received, 0% packet loss, time 646ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.019/0.025/0.119/0.010 ms, ipg/ewma 0.064/0.020 ms

Any ideas or suggestions welcome.

Thanks, Sasha