Para solucionar este error:
>> "No puede iniciar su sesión, asegurese de que su nombre de usuario y
>> dominio sean correctos, luego repita su contraseña"
>>
Debe sacar del dominio el PC con el usuario administrador de Dominio y
posteriormente del reinicio, volver a meter ese PC en el dominio.
Con esto creo que el problema se solucionará.
Un saludo.
Ramón Megías
El 30/07/09, centos-es-request(a)centos.org
<centos-es-request(a)centos.org> escribió:
> Envíe los mensajes para la lista CentOS-es a
> centos-es(a)centos.org
>
> Para subscribirse o anular su subscripción a través de la WEB
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
>
> O por correo electrónico, enviando un mensaje con el texto "help" en
> el asunto (subject) o en el cuerpo a:
> centos-es-request(a)centos.org
>
> Puede contactar con el responsable de la lista escribiendo a:
> centos-es-owner(a)centos.org
>
> Si responde a algún contenido de este mensaje, por favor, edite la
> linea del asunto (subject) para que el texto sea mas especifico que:
> "Re: Contents of CentOS-es digest...". Además, por favor, incluya en
> la respuesta sólo aquellas partes del mensaje a las que está
> respondiendo.
>
>
> Asuntos del día:
>
> 1. Re: Crisis en el proyecto CentOS (Victor Padro)
> 2. Re: Crisis en el proyecto CentOS (Victor Padro)
> 3. Re: Crisis en el proyecto CentOS (Victor Padro)
> 4. Re: modem 3g (Victor Padro)
> 5. Re: problema de validacion con samba como PDC y LDAP
> (samuel correa)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:27:00 -0500
> From: Victor Padro <vpadro(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Crisis en el proyecto CentOS
> To: centos-es(a)centos.org
> Message-ID:
> <beee84cb0907301327n4a1f9627yc443ad0572d69ca1(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> 2009/7/30 Arturo Limon <limonavila(a)gmail.com>:
>> Espero y deseo fervientemente que esto no dé al traste con el proyecto.
>> Estoy apostando mucho por Centos (concretamente K12LTSP en su encarnación
>> Centos) y una interrupción del proyecto me crearía serios problemas para
>> cambiar de distribución.
>> Vaya todo mi apoyo al equipo Centos y a toda la gente que hace posible
>> esta
>> distribución.
>> Saludos.
>> Arturo Limón.
>> El 30 de julio de 2009 20:07, Eduardo Grosclaude
>> <eduardo.grosclaude(a)gmail.com> escribió:
>>>
>>> Hola, quizás no todos los miembros de la lista en castellano lean la
>>> lista en inglés de CentOS. Me parece apropiado comunicarles que en
>>> estos momentos la lista inglesa literalmente hierve a causa de un
>>> problema ocurrido con uno de los fundadores del proyecto, Lance Davis.
>>> Esta era la única persona que tenía acceso al registro del dominio
>>> centos.org y... a los fondos de las donaciones recibidas por el
>>> proyecto, y... ¡¡¡no se lo ubica por ningún lado!!!
>>>
>>> En el sitio de CentOS está publicada una carta abierta a este (ex?)
>>> miembro del proyecto, firmada por un núcleo de los desarrolladores que
>>> están más involucrados con el proyecto, y el hilo de discusión
>>> generado en la lista inglesa se puede seguir en
>>> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-July/079767.html
>>>
>>> Aunque la situación es incierta, y seguramente lamentable,
>>> personalmente no creo que sea una crisis grave ni mucho menos. La
>>> totalidad de los demás desarrolladores del proyecto están alineados y
>>> gran cantidad de los usuarios está en estos momentos manifestando
>>> solidaridad con las acciones tomadas. No quiero traer alarma a la
>>> comunidad, sino información objetiva; y posiblemente reflexionar sobre
>>> las complicaciones de mantener las cosas de un proyecto comunitario en
>>> las manos de una sola persona.
>>>
>>> Si la lista quiere discutir alguna medida a tomar como sector de habla
>>> hispana de la comunidad, o simplemente discutir la situación, me
>>> gustaría saber su opinión. Más allá de los problemas que pueda tener
>>> esta persona y el impacto sobre el proyecto, como usuarios que
>>> reconocemos el esfuerzo de los desarrolladores, me parece adecuado
>>> mostrarles apoyo y ofrecerse para lo que podamos ayudar.
>>>
>>> Un saludo cordial!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Eduardo Grosclaude
>>> Universidad Nacional del Comahue
>>> Neuquen, Argentina
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CentOS-es mailing list
>>> CentOS-es(a)centos.org
>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS-es mailing list
>> CentOS-es(a)centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
>>
>>
>
> No se preocupen Karanbir acaba de mencionar hace unos minutos que el
> proyecto CentOS continuara, lo que realmente tiene el problema es el
> dominio centos.org sin embargo que ello se resolvera de alguna manera
> u otra, no hay que preocuparse!
>
> si pueden lean esto tambien:
> http://dag.wieers.com/blog/the-burden-of-keeping-things-private
>
> --
> Usuario Linux Registrado #452368
> Usuario Ubuntu Registrado #28025
>
> "Doing a thing well is often a waste of time."
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> //Netbook - HP Mini 1035NR 2GB 60GB - Windows XP/Ubuntu 9.04
> //Desktop - Core 2 Duo 1.86Ghz 8GB 500GB - Windows 7(testing)
> //Desktop - Core 2 Duo 2.40Ghz 8GB 320GB - MacOS Leopard
> //Desktop - Athlon 64 2.7Ghz 8GB 400GB - Ubuntu Jaunty
> //Server - Pentium D 3.2Ghz 8GB 1TB - Debian Lenny
> //Server - Celeron 1.8Ghz 1GB 160GB - Pfsense
> //Server - NSLU2 266Mhz 32MB 1TB - Debian Lenny
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:28:18 -0500
> From: Victor Padro <vpadro(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Crisis en el proyecto CentOS
> To: centos-es(a)centos.org
> Message-ID:
> <beee84cb0907301328r5c77e426p3994bca9df369b29(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> 2009/7/30 Victor Padro <vpadro(a)gmail.com>:
>> 2009/7/30 Arturo Limon <limonavila(a)gmail.com>:
>>> Espero y deseo fervientemente que esto no dé al traste con el proyecto.
>>> Estoy apostando mucho por Centos (concretamente K12LTSP en su encarnación
>>> Centos) y una interrupción del proyecto me crearía serios problemas para
>>> cambiar de distribución.
>>> Vaya todo mi apoyo al equipo Centos y a toda la gente que hace posible
>>> esta
>>> distribución.
>>> Saludos.
>>> Arturo Limón.
>>> El 30 de julio de 2009 20:07, Eduardo Grosclaude
>>> <eduardo.grosclaude(a)gmail.com> escribió:
>>>>
>>>> Hola, quizás no todos los miembros de la lista en castellano lean la
>>>> lista en inglés de CentOS. Me parece apropiado comunicarles que en
>>>> estos momentos la lista inglesa literalmente hierve a causa de un
>>>> problema ocurrido con uno de los fundadores del proyecto, Lance Davis.
>>>> Esta era la única persona que tenía acceso al registro del dominio
>>>> centos.org y... a los fondos de las donaciones recibidas por el
>>>> proyecto, y... ¡¡¡no se lo ubica por ningún lado!!!
>>>>
>>>> En el sitio de CentOS está publicada una carta abierta a este (ex?)
>>>> miembro del proyecto, firmada por un núcleo de los desarrolladores que
>>>> están más involucrados con el proyecto, y el hilo de discusión
>>>> generado en la lista inglesa se puede seguir en
>>>> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-July/079767.html
>>>>
>>>> Aunque la situación es incierta, y seguramente lamentable,
>>>> personalmente no creo que sea una crisis grave ni mucho menos. La
>>>> totalidad de los demás desarrolladores del proyecto están alineados y
>>>> gran cantidad de los usuarios está en estos momentos manifestando
>>>> solidaridad con las acciones tomadas. No quiero traer alarma a la
>>>> comunidad, sino información objetiva; y posiblemente reflexionar sobre
>>>> las complicaciones de mantener las cosas de un proyecto comunitario en
>>>> las manos de una sola persona.
>>>>
>>>> Si la lista quiere discutir alguna medida a tomar como sector de habla
>>>> hispana de la comunidad, o simplemente discutir la situación, me
>>>> gustaría saber su opinión. Más allá de los problemas que pueda tener
>>>> esta persona y el impacto sobre el proyecto, como usuarios que
>>>> reconocemos el esfuerzo de los desarrolladores, me parece adecuado
>>>> mostrarles apoyo y ofrecerse para lo que podamos ayudar.
>>>>
>>>> Un saludo cordial!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Eduardo Grosclaude
>>>> Universidad Nacional del Comahue
>>>> Neuquen, Argentina
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CentOS-es mailing list
>>>> CentOS-es(a)centos.org
>>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CentOS-es mailing list
>>> CentOS-es(a)centos.org
>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
>>>
>>>
>>
>> No se preocupen Karanbir acaba de mencionar hace unos minutos que el
>> proyecto CentOS continuara, lo que realmente tiene el problema es el
>> dominio centos.org sin embargo que ello se resolvera de alguna manera
>> u otra, no hay que preocuparse!
>>
>> si pueden lean esto tambien:
>> http://dag.wieers.com/blog/the-burden-of-keeping-things-private
>>
>> --
>> Usuario Linux Registrado #452368
>> Usuario Ubuntu Registrado #28025
>>
>> "Doing a thing well is often a waste of time."
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> //Netbook - HP Mini 1035NR 2GB 60GB - Windows XP/Ubuntu 9.04
>> //Desktop - Core 2 Duo 1.86Ghz 8GB 500GB - Windows 7(testing)
>> //Desktop - Core 2 Duo 2.40Ghz 8GB 320GB - MacOS Leopard
>> //Desktop - Athlon 64 2.7Ghz 8GB 400GB - Ubuntu Jaunty
>> //Server - Pentium D 3.2Ghz 8GB 1TB - Debian Lenny
>> //Server - Celeron 1.8Ghz 1GB 160GB - Pfsense
>> //Server - NSLU2 266Mhz 32MB 1TB - Debian Lenny
>>
>
> Ooops, se me paso copiarles esto:
>
> Karanbir comento que:
> However, the one thing that most people seem to be moving on already is
> the assumption that CentOS is about to go away - which isnt correct at
> all. For the users, we will make sure that there is as little an impact
> as possible.
>
> --
> Usuario Linux Registrado #452368
> Usuario Ubuntu Registrado #28025
>
> "Doing a thing well is often a waste of time."
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> //Netbook - HP Mini 1035NR 2GB 60GB - Windows XP/Ubuntu 9.04
> //Desktop - Core 2 Duo 1.86Ghz 8GB 500GB - Windows 7(testing)
> //Desktop - Core 2 Duo 2.40Ghz 8GB 320GB - MacOS Leopard
> //Desktop - Athlon 64 2.7Ghz 8GB 400GB - Ubuntu Jaunty
> //Server - Pentium D 3.2Ghz 8GB 1TB - Debian Lenny
> //Server - Celeron 1.8Ghz 1GB 160GB - Pfsense
> //Server - NSLU2 266Mhz 32MB 1TB - Debian Lenny
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:29:43 -0500
> From: Victor Padro <vpadro(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Crisis en el proyecto CentOS
> To: centos-es(a)centos.org
> Message-ID:
> <beee84cb0907301329m75fdd69qd192f43eca626f1d(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> 2009/7/30 Victor Padro <vpadro(a)gmail.com>:
>> 2009/7/30 Victor Padro <vpadro(a)gmail.com>:
>>> 2009/7/30 Arturo Limon <limonavila(a)gmail.com>:
>>>> Espero y deseo fervientemente que esto no dé al traste con el proyecto.
>>>> Estoy apostando mucho por Centos (concretamente K12LTSP en su
>>>> encarnación
>>>> Centos) y una interrupción del proyecto me crearía serios problemas para
>>>> cambiar de distribución.
>>>> Vaya todo mi apoyo al equipo Centos y a toda la gente que hace posible
>>>> esta
>>>> distribución.
>>>> Saludos.
>>>> Arturo Limón.
>>>> El 30 de julio de 2009 20:07, Eduardo Grosclaude
>>>> <eduardo.grosclaude(a)gmail.com> escribió:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hola, quizás no todos los miembros de la lista en castellano lean la
>>>>> lista en inglés de CentOS. Me parece apropiado comunicarles que en
>>>>> estos momentos la lista inglesa literalmente hierve a causa de un
>>>>> problema ocurrido con uno de los fundadores del proyecto, Lance Davis.
>>>>> Esta era la única persona que tenía acceso al registro del dominio
>>>>> centos.org y... a los fondos de las donaciones recibidas por el
>>>>> proyecto, y... ¡¡¡no se lo ubica por ningún lado!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> En el sitio de CentOS está publicada una carta abierta a este (ex?)
>>>>> miembro del proyecto, firmada por un núcleo de los desarrolladores que
>>>>> están más involucrados con el proyecto, y el hilo de discusión
>>>>> generado en la lista inglesa se puede seguir en
>>>>> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-July/079767.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Aunque la situación es incierta, y seguramente lamentable,
>>>>> personalmente no creo que sea una crisis grave ni mucho menos. La
>>>>> totalidad de los demás desarrolladores del proyecto están alineados y
>>>>> gran cantidad de los usuarios está en estos momentos manifestando
>>>>> solidaridad con las acciones tomadas. No quiero traer alarma a la
>>>>> comunidad, sino información objetiva; y posiblemente reflexionar sobre
>>>>> las complicaciones de mantener las cosas de un proyecto comunitario en
>>>>> las manos de una sola persona.
>>>>>
>>>>> Si la lista quiere discutir alguna medida a tomar como sector de habla
>>>>> hispana de la comunidad, o simplemente discutir la situación, me
>>>>> gustaría saber su opinión. Más allá de los problemas que pueda tener
>>>>> esta persona y el impacto sobre el proyecto, como usuarios que
>>>>> reconocemos el esfuerzo de los desarrolladores, me parece adecuado
>>>>> mostrarles apoyo y ofrecerse para lo que podamos ayudar.
>>>>>
>>>>> Un saludo cordial!
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Eduardo Grosclaude
>>>>> Universidad Nacional del Comahue
>>>>> Neuquen, Argentina
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> CentOS-es mailing list
>>>>> CentOS-es(a)centos.org
>>>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CentOS-es mailing list
>>>> CentOS-es(a)centos.org
>>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> No se preocupen Karanbir acaba de mencionar hace unos minutos que el
>>> proyecto CentOS continuara, lo que realmente tiene el problema es el
>>> dominio centos.org sin embargo que ello se resolvera de alguna manera
>>> u otra, no hay que preocuparse!
>>>
>>> si pueden lean esto tambien:
>>> http://dag.wieers.com/blog/the-burden-of-keeping-things-private
>>>
>>> --
>>> Usuario Linux Registrado #452368
>>> Usuario Ubuntu Registrado #28025
>>>
>>> "Doing a thing well is often a waste of time."
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> //Netbook - HP Mini 1035NR 2GB 60GB - Windows XP/Ubuntu 9.04
>>> //Desktop - Core 2 Duo 1.86Ghz 8GB 500GB - Windows 7(testing)
>>> //Desktop - Core 2 Duo 2.40Ghz 8GB 320GB - MacOS Leopard
>>> //Desktop - Athlon 64 2.7Ghz 8GB 400GB - Ubuntu Jaunty
>>> //Server - Pentium D 3.2Ghz 8GB 1TB - Debian Lenny
>>> //Server - Celeron 1.8Ghz 1GB 160GB - Pfsense
>>> //Server - NSLU2 266Mhz 32MB 1TB - Debian Lenny
>>>
>>
>> Ooops, se me paso copiarles esto:
>>
>> Karanbir comento que:
>> However, the one thing that most people seem to be moving on already is
>> the assumption that CentOS is about to go away - which isnt correct at
>> all. For the users, we will make sure that there is as little an impact
>> as possible.
>>
>> --
>> Usuario Linux Registrado #452368
>> Usuario Ubuntu Registrado #28025
>>
>> "Doing a thing well is often a waste of time."
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> //Netbook - HP Mini 1035NR 2GB 60GB - Windows XP/Ubuntu 9.04
>> //Desktop - Core 2 Duo 1.86Ghz 8GB 500GB - Windows 7(testing)
>> //Desktop - Core 2 Duo 2.40Ghz 8GB 320GB - MacOS Leopard
>> //Desktop - Athlon 64 2.7Ghz 8GB 400GB - Ubuntu Jaunty
>> //Server - Pentium D 3.2Ghz 8GB 1TB - Debian Lenny
>> //Server - Celeron 1.8Ghz 1GB 160GB - Pfsense
>> //Server - NSLU2 266Mhz 32MB 1TB - Debian Lenny
>>
>
> Por ultimo acaban de postear esto:
> http://www.centos.org/
>
> Saludos.
>
> --
> Usuario Linux Registrado #452368
> Usuario Ubuntu Registrado #28025
>
> "Doing a thing well is often a waste of time."
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> //Netbook - HP Mini 1035NR 2GB 60GB - Windows XP/Ubuntu 9.04
> //Desktop - Core 2 Duo 1.86Ghz 8GB 500GB - Windows 7(testing)
> //Desktop - Core 2 Duo 2.40Ghz 8GB 320GB - MacOS Leopard
> //Desktop - Athlon 64 2.7Ghz 8GB 400GB - Ubuntu Jaunty
> //Server - Pentium D 3.2Ghz 8GB 1TB - Debian Lenny
> //Server - Celeron 1.8Ghz 1GB 160GB - Pfsense
> //Server - NSLU2 266Mhz 32MB 1TB - Debian Lenny
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:30:44 -0500
> From: Victor Padro <vpadro(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] modem 3g
> To: centos-es(a)centos.org
> Message-ID:
> <beee84cb0907301330n6b81d559mccefd8d21e4e455d(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> 2009/7/30 alejandro <alejandro_garrido(a)click.com.py>:
>> hola, tengo el modem huawei E226 y fedora 11.
>>
>> mi proble es que al conectar el modem al equipo, lo detecta todo bien y
>> dice que esta conectado a la red banda ancha GSM, y hasta ahi todo bien,
>> pero despues quiero navegar y nada, no abre la pagina.
>>
>> nadie sabe porque debe ser, busque y probe un monton de cosas como,
>> direcciones DNS pero nada de nada, si alguien me puede dar una mano les
>> voy a estar agradecido.
>>
>> un saludo
>>
>> AG
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS-es mailing list
>> CentOS-es(a)centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
>>
>
> Te recuerdo que esta es una lista de CentOS no de Fedora.
> ya buscaste en google algo acerca de tu problematica?
>
> --
> Usuario Linux Registrado #452368
> Usuario Ubuntu Registrado #28025
>
> "Doing a thing well is often a waste of time."
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> //Netbook - HP Mini 1035NR 2GB 60GB - Windows XP/Ubuntu 9.04
> //Desktop - Core 2 Duo 1.86Ghz 8GB 500GB - Windows 7(testing)
> //Desktop - Core 2 Duo 2.40Ghz 8GB 320GB - MacOS Leopard
> //Desktop - Athlon 64 2.7Ghz 8GB 400GB - Ubuntu Jaunty
> //Server - Pentium D 3.2Ghz 8GB 1TB - Debian Lenny
> //Server - Celeron 1.8Ghz 1GB 160GB - Pfsense
> //Server - NSLU2 266Mhz 32MB 1TB - Debian Lenny
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:11:43 -0500
> From: samuel correa <samuel.correa(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] problema de validacion con samba como PDC y
> LDAP
> To: centos-es(a)centos.org
> Message-ID:
> <40f21f6a0907301411m1a6d508at36a32819546c6790(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hola.
>
> Gracias por responder, lamento decirlo pero la solución que me propones no
> me dió el resultado esperado, es decir, sigo con el mismo problema...
>
> alguna otra sugerencia??...
>
> (es de caracter HYPERIMPORTANTE!)
>
> Samuel
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Germán C. Basisty <
> german.basisty(a)eipsistemas.com.ar> wrote:
>
>> Tenes que modificar el registro de xp.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hklm\system\currentcontrolset\services\netlogon\parameters\requiresignorseal
>> que esta en 1 pasarlo a 0.
>>
>>
>>
>> Si esta todo bien tiene que salir andando derecho.
>>
>>
>>
>> Saludos.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Germán C. Basisty*
>>
>> *EIP SISTEMAS*
>>
>> *Consultor - Tecnología Informática*
>>
>> tel./fax +54 (299) 436 6929
>>
>> cel. +54 (2942) 15 472 223
>>
>> german.basisty(a)eipsistemas.com.ar
>>
>> http://ww.eipsistemas.com.ar
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *De:* centos-es-bounces(a)centos.org [mailto:centos-es-bounces@centos.org]
>> *En
>> nombre de *samuel correa
>> *Enviado el:* jueves, 30 de julio de 2009 02:20 p.m.
>> *Para:* centos-es(a)centos.org
>> *Asunto:* Re: [CentOS-es] problema de validacion con samba como PDC y LDAP
>>
>>
>>
>> Hola.. no se si ya me respondieron.. es que no estaba inscrito a la lista
>> y
>> no sabria si ya respondieron o no.. si ya respondieron podrian hacerlo de
>> nuevo que ya si estoy inscrito en la lista... de lo contrario.. podrian
>> colaborarme con esto???
>>
>> gracias.
>>
>>
>> ---------------
>>
>> Buenas Tardes a todos.
>>
>> Tengo el siguiente problema:
>>
>> Tengo un servidor con la ultima version de Centos 5.
>> Luego instale y configure OpenLdap (openldap-servers-2.3.43-3.
>>
>> el5).
>> Luego configure el dominio Samba (Version 3.0.33-3.7.el5) con OpenLdap.
>>
>> Todo parecia estar funcionando correctamente pero no fue asi.
>>
>> Al final de la configuración del Samba las maquinas (que tienen Win XP
>> pro)
>> se estaban agregando al dominio PDC que habia configurado previamente,
>> pero
>> luego de reiniciar esa maquina e intentar iniciar con una cuenta creada en
>> LDAP no puedo niniciar. El error de validación que aparece en el windows
>> es
>> el siguiente:
>>
>> "El sistema no puede iniciar su sesión debido al siguiente error:
>>
>> Uno de los dispositivos vinculados al sistema no funciona.
>>
>> Intentelo de nuevo o consulte con el administrador del sistema"
>>
>>
>> Lo curioso es que si está buscando ese usuario, ya que si con ese usuario
>> ingreso una contraseña erronea el me saca el error:
>>
>> "No puede iniciar su sesión, asegurese de que su nombre de usuario y
>> dominio sean correctos, luego repita su contraseña"
>>
>>
>> Quisiera que me colaboraran con la validación del usuario de LDAP en el
>> equipo Windows que ha sido previamente agregado al dominio de Samba.
>> Mis archivos de configuración son los siguientes, si necesitan alguno más
>> me avisan que con gusto lo mostraré.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> */etc/openldap/ldap.conf*
>>
>>
>> HOST 192.168.30.100
>> BASE dc=siona,dc=cs,dc=udea,dc=edu,dc=co
>>
>> SIZELIMIT 12
>> TLS_CACERTDIR /etc/openldap/cacerts
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> */etc/ldap.conf*
>>
>> host 127.0.0.1
>>
>> base dc=prueba,dc=cs,dc=udea,dc=edu,dc=co
>>
>> ssl no
>> tls_cacertdir /etc/openldap/cacerts
>> pam_password md5
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> */etc/openldap/slapd.conf*
>>
>> include /etc/openldap/schema/core.schema
>> include /etc/openldap/schema/autofs.schema
>> include /etc/openldap/schema/misc.schema
>> include /etc/openldap/schema/cosine.schema
>> include /etc/openldap/schema/dyngroup.schema
>> include /etc/openldap/schema/java.schema
>> include /etc/openldap/schema/inetorgperson.schema
>> include /etc/openldap/schema/nis.schema
>> include /etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema
>>
>>
>> pidfile /var/run/openldap/slapd.pid
>> argsfile /var/run/openldap/slapd.args
>>
>> schemacheck on
>>
>> loglevel 512
>>
>> password-hash {CRYPT}
>>
>> database ldbm
>> suffix "dc=prueba,dc=cs,dc=udea,dc=edu,dc=co"
>> rootdn "cn=cacique,dc=prueba,dc=cs,dc=udea,dc=edu,dc=co"
>>
>> rootpw {MD5}V0L/mtFz0HPxFqPffgV
>>
>>
>> directory /var/lib/ldap
>>
>> index sambaSID eq
>> index sambaPrimaryGroupSID eq
>> index sambaDomainName eq
>> index objectClass,uid,uidNumber,gidNumber,memberUid eq
>> index cn,mail,surname,givenname eq,subinitial
>>
>>
>>
>> #access to
>> attrs=userPassword,sambaNTPassword,sambaLMPassword,sambaPwdLastSet,sambaPwdMustChange,sambaAcctFlags,sambaPasswordHistory
>>
>> access to
>> attrs=userPassword,sambaNTPassword,sambaLMPassword,sambaPwdLastSet,sambaPwdMustChange,sambaAcctFlags,sambaPasswordHistory
>> by dn="cn=cacique,dc=prueba,dc=cs,dc=udea,dc=edu,dc=co" write
>> by anonymous auth
>> by self write
>> by * none
>>
>>
>> # The admin dn has full write access
>> access to *
>> by dn="cn=cacique,dc=prueba,dc=cs,dc=udea,dc=edu,dc=co" write
>> by * read
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> */etc/samba/smb.conf
>> *
>> [global]
>>
>> workgroup = PDC-SMB3
>>
>> netbios name = PRUEBA
>> server string = Servidor Samba con LDAP %v
>>
>> security = user
>> encrypt passwords = Yes
>> min passwd length = 3
>>
>> obey pam restrictions = No
>>
>> ldap passwd sync = Yes
>> log level = 0
>> syslog = 0
>> log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
>> max log size = 100000
>> time server = Yes
>> socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
>> mangling method = hash2
>> Dos charset = 850
>> Unix charset = ISO8859-1
>> logon script = logon.bat
>> logon drive = X:
>> logon home =
>> logon path =
>>
>>
>> domain logons = Yes
>> os level = 65
>> preferred master = Yes
>> domain master = Yes
>> wins support = Yes
>>
>> passwd program = /usr/sbin/smbldap-passwd %u
>> passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://192.168.30.100/
>> ldap admin dn = cn=cacique,dc=prueba,dc=cs,dc=udea,dc=edu,dc=co
>> ldap suffix = dc=prueba,dc=cs,dc=udea,dc=edu,dc=co
>> ldap group suffix = ou=grupos
>> ldap user suffix = ou=estudiantes
>> ldap machine suffix = ou=maquinas
>> ldap idmap suffix = ou=estudiantes
>> ldap ssl = no
>>
>> add user script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-useradd -m "%u"
>> ldap delete dn = Yes
>> add machine script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-useradd -w "%u"
>> add group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupadd -p "%g"
>> add user to group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -m "%u" "%g"
>> delete user from group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -x "%u"
>> "%g"
>> set primary group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-usermod -g "%g" "%u"
>>
>>
>> idmap uid = 16777216-33554431
>> idmap gid = 16777216-33554431
>> template shell = /bin/false
>> winbind use default domain = no
>>
>>
>> #============================ Share Definitions ======================
>>
>> [homes]
>> comment = Privado de %U, %u
>> read only = No
>> create mask = 0644
>> directory mask = 0775
>> browseable = No
>>
>>
>> [netlogon]
>> path = /export/admstaff/samba/netlogon/
>> browseable = No
>> read only = yes
>>
>>
>> [Profiles]
>> path = /export/admstaff/samba/profiles
>>
>>
>> writeable = yes
>> create mask = 0600
>> directory mask = 0700
>> browseable = No
>> guest ok = Yes
>> profile acls = yes
>> csc policy = disable
>> # next line is a great way to secure the profiles
>> force user = %U
>> # next line allows administrator to access all profiles
>> # valid users = %U @"Domain Admins"
>> [printers]
>> comment = Impresoras en la Red
>> printer admin = @"Print Operators"
>>
>>
>> guest ok = yes
>> printable = yes
>> path = /export/admstaff/samba
>> browseable = No
>> read only = Yes
>> print command = /usr/bin/lpr -P%p -r %s
>> lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -P%p
>> lprm command = /usr/bin/lprm -P%p %j
>>
>> [printers-1]
>> path = /export/admstaff/samba/printers
>> guest ok = No
>> ; browseable = Yes
>> read only = Yes
>> valid users = @"Print Operators"
>> write list = @"Print Operators"
>> create mask = 0664
>> directory mask = 0775
>>
>>
>> [publico-siona]
>> comment = Directorios Publicos
>> path = /export/publico
>> browseable = Yes
>> read only = No
>> guest ok = Yes
>> directory mask = 0775
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> Les agradezco mucho su ayuda...
>>
>> hasta luego.
>>
>>
>> pueden responderme a samuel.correa at gmail
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CentOS-es mailing list
>> CentOS-es(a)centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
>>
>>
> ------------ pr?a parte ------------
> Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
> URL:
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-es/attachments/20090730/431bf969/a…
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-es mailing list
> CentOS-es(a)centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
>
>
> Fin de Resumen de CentOS-es, Vol 31, Envío 55
> *********************************************
>
Hola lista, tengo un problema con un disco usb, cuando enchufo el disco al
server me asigno /dev/sdc1, el disco esta en EXT4 y mi centos es Linux
version 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 (Red Hat 4.1.2-46). Bien el problema es el
siguiente, de un momento a otro ls: reading directory .: Input/output error,
tiro un dmesg y veo qeu cambio el disco usb de particion:
sdc: Write Protect is off
sdc: Mode Sense: 38 00 00 00
sdc: assuming drive cache: write through
SCSI device sdc: 1953525168 512-byte hdwr sectors (1000205 MB)
sdc: Write Protect is off
sdc: Mode Sense: 38 00 00 00
sdc: assuming drive cache: write through
sdc:<6>EXT3 FS on dm-0, internal journal
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on dm-1, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on dm-5, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on dm-2, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on dm-6, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on dm-7, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on dm-3, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on dm-8, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
EXT3 FS on sda1, internal journal
EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
Adding 8552440k swap on /dev/VolGroup00/LVSwap. Priority:-1 extents:1
across:8552440k
powernow-k8: Pre-initialization of ACPI failed
powernow-k8: Found 1 AMD Athlon(tm) II X2 245 Processor processors (2 cpu
cores) (version 2.20.00)
powernow-k8: Your BIOS does not provide _PSS objects. PowerNow! does not
work on SMP systems without _PSS objects. Complain to your BIOS vendor.
powernow-k8: Your BIOS does not provide _PSS objects. PowerNow! does not
work on SMP systems without _PSS objects. Complain to your BIOS vendor.
sdc1
sd 2:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdc
sd 2:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 0
usb-storage: device scan complete
NET: Registered protocol family 10
lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions
IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling driver
eth0: no IPv6 routers present
EXT4-fs: barriers enabled
kjournald2 starting: pid 2815, dev sdc1:8, commit interval 5 seconds
EXT4 FS on sdc1, internal journal on sdc1:8
EXT4-fs: delayed allocation enabled
EXT4-fs: file extents enabled
EXT4-fs: mballoc enabled
EXT4-fs: mounted filesystem sdc1 with ordered data mode
eth0: link down.
eth0: link up.
eth0: link down.
eth0: link up.
eth0: link down.
eth0: link up.
eth0: link down.
eth0: link up.
eth0: link down.
eth0: link up.
eth0: link down.
eth0: link up.
eth0: link down.
eth0: link up.
eth0: link down.
eth0: link up.
tnslsnr[2946]: segfault at 0000000000000018 rip 0000003115a70485 rsp
00007fff0bcb96b0 error 4
tnslsnr[9084]: segfault at 0000000000000018 rip 0000003115a70485 rsp
00007fff101eaed0 error 4
usb 1-4: reset high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 2
usb 1-4: USB disconnect, address 2
sd 2:0:0:0: SCSI error: return code = 0x00010000
end_request: I/O error, dev sdc, sector 393094152
sd 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to device being removed
sd 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to device being removed
sd 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to device being removed
sd 2:0:0:0: SCSI error: return code = 0x00010000
end_request: I/O error, dev sdc, sector 393094392
Aborting journal on device sdc1:8.
sd 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to device being removed
Buffer I/O error on device sdc1, logical block 121667584
lost page write due to I/O error on sdc1
JBD2: I/O error detected when updating journal superblock for sdc1:8.
journal commit I/O error
sd 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to device being removed
Buffer I/O error on device sdc1, logical block 13107232
lost page write due to I/O error on sdc1
sd 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to device being removed
Buffer I/O error on device sdc1, logical block 50855968
lost page write due to I/O error on sdc1
sd 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to device being removed
Buffer I/O error on device sdc1, logical block 61866016
lost page write due to I/O error on sdc1
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
ext4_abort called.
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_journal_start_sb: Detected aborted journal
Remounting filesystem read-only
usb 1-4: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 3
usb 1-4: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
scsi3 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices
usb-storage: device found at 3
usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning
Vendor: ST310005 Model: 20AS Rev:
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 04
SCSI device sdd: 1953525168 512-byte hdwr sectors (1000205 MB)
sdd: Write Protect is off
sdd: Mode Sense: 38 00 00 00
sdd: assuming drive cache: write through
SCSI device sdd: 1953525168 512-byte hdwr sectors (1000205 MB)
sdd: Write Protect is off
sdd: Mode Sense: 38 00 00 00
sdd: assuming drive cache: write through
sdd: sdd1
sd 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sdd
sd 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 0
usb-storage: device scan complete
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
EXT3-fs: sdd1: couldn't mount because of unsupported optional features
(240).
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs error (device sdc1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
scsi 2:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to dead device
EXT4-fs: barriers enabled
kjournald2 starting: pid 15697, dev sdd1:8, commit interval 5 seconds
EXT4 FS on sdd1, internal journal on sdd1:8
EXT4-fs: delayed allocation enabled
EXT4-fs: file extents enabled
EXT4-fs: mballoc enabled
EXT4-fs: recovery complete.
EXT4-fs: mounted filesystem sdd1 with ordered data mode
usbcore: registered new driver usbserial
drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial support registered for generic
usbcore: registered new driver usbserial_generic
drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial Driver core
drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial support registered for GSM modem
(1-port)
usbcore: registered new driver option
drivers/usb/serial/option.c: USB Driver for GSM modems: v0.7.1
El equipo no se reinicio " uptime 10:51:04 up 6 days, 15:14, 1 user,
load average: 0.03, 0.91, 2.25 "
Alguien me puede guiar por donde puede venir el problema de que cambie por
si solo!!?? ahora tengo montado asi=
/dev/sdc1 917G 221G 650G 26% /mnt/disk2
/dev/sdd1 917G 221G 650G 26% /mnt/disk2
donde sdd1 es donde se encuentra en este momento y sdc1 no me permite
desmontar
umount /dev/sdc1
umount: /mnt/disk2: device is busy
umount: /mnt/disk2: device is busy
Help me!!!!!
Gracias a todos por su tiempo!!
On 2/9/22 01:01, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are testing an IPA/IDM infrastructure which is a mix of RHEL 8 and
> CentOS Stream 8 environments.
> The configuration has been completed since last summer, and it is working
> fine between updates.
>
> Currently, the CentOS Stream 8 IPA servers cannot upgrade. I put the whole
> error message below, but after analyzing a bit, it seems to be that the
> problem is between:
> bind-dyndb-ldap (for which there is no new update)
> and
> bind-libs-lite (for which a new update is available)
>
> $ sudo dnf upgrade bind-libs-lite*
> Error:
> Problem: problem with installed package
> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64
> - package bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64
> requires libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and
> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64
> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and
> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-3.el8.x86_64
> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and
> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.x86_64
> - cannot install the best update candidate for package
> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64
>
> The update bind-libs-lite (32:9.11.36-2) seems to offer:
> /usr/lib64/libdns.so.1115
> while bind-dyndb-ldap (11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b) seems to still
> require precisely:
> /usr/lib64/libdns.so.1112
>
> $ sudo dnf provides */libdns.so*
> ...
> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 : Libraries for working with the DNS
> protocol
> Repo : @System
> Matched from:
> Filename : /usr/lib64/libdns.so.1112
> Filename : /usr/lib64/libdns.so.1112.0.2
> ...
> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 : Libraries for working with the DNS
> protocol
> Repo : appstream
> Matched from:
> Filename : /usr/lib64/libdns.so.1115
> Filename : /usr/lib64/libdns.so.1115.0.3
> ...
>
> $ sudo dnf list bind-libs-lite bind-dyndb-ldap
> Installed Packages
> bind-dyndb-ldap.x86_64 11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b
> @appstream
> bind-libs-lite.x86_64 32:9.11.26-6.el8
> @appstream
> Available Packages
> bind-libs-lite.i686 32:9.11.36-2.el8
> appstream
> bind-libs-lite.x86_64 32:9.11.36-2.el8
> appstream
>
> Please note that, of course, the module stream idm:DL1 is enabled:
>
> $ sudo dnf module list idm*
> CentOS Stream 8 - AppStream
> Name Stream Profiles
> Summary
>
> idm DL1 [e] adtrust, client, common [d], dns
> [i], server The Red Hat Enterprise Linux Identity Management
> system module
> idm client [d] common [d]
> RHEL IdM long term support client module
>
> Also, as can be expected, these updates are not yet available on the *RHEL
> 8* IPA servers:
>
> $ sudo dnf list bind-libs-lite bind-dyndb-ldap
> Updating Subscription Management repositories.
> Installed Packages
> bind-dyndb-ldap.x86_64 11.6-2.module+el8.4.0+9328+4ec4e316
> @rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms
> bind-libs-lite.x86_64 32:9.11.26-6.el8
> @rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms
> Available Packages
> bind-libs-lite.i686 32:9.11.26-6.el8
> rhel-8-for-x86_64-appstream-rpms
>
> So, is there any workaround, or should we simply wait for the IPA/IDM
> server DL1 module stream to be updated?
> (there are updates of the ipa packages which are pending there, juts not
> bind-dyndb-ldap)
>
> Also, should I rather send such reports of our CentOS Stream testing to
> another mailing-list? (devel?)
> Or book them into Red Hat's bugzilla?
>
> Thanks in advance for your comments!
>
> Mathieu
>
> ## Full error log when trying to update a CentOS Stream 8 IPA/IDM server
>
> $ sudo ipactl status
> Directory Service: RUNNING
> krb5kdc Service: RUNNING
> kadmin Service: RUNNING
> named Service: RUNNING
> httpd Service: RUNNING
> ipa-custodia Service: RUNNING
> ipa-otpd Service: RUNNING
> ipa-dnskeysyncd Service: RUNNING
> ipa: INFO: The ipactl command was successful
>
> $ sudo dnf upgrade --refresh
> CentOS Stream 8 - AppStream
> 13 kB/s |
> 4.4 kB 00:00
> CentOS Stream 8 - BaseOS
> 26 kB/s
> | 3.9 kB 00:00
> CentOS Stream 8 - Extras
> 15 kB/s
> | 3.0 kB 00:00
> Error:
> Problem 1: package
> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64 requires
> libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and
> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64
> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and
> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-3.el8.x86_64
> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and
> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.x86_64
> - cannot install the best update candidate for package
> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64
> - cannot install the best update candidate for package
> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64
> Problem 2: problem with installed package
> bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64
> - package bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64
> requires libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and
> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64
> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and
> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-3.el8.x86_64
> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and
> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.x86_64
> - package bind-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 requires libdns.so.1115()(64bit),
> but none of the providers can be installed
> - package bind-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 requires bind-libs-lite(x86-64) =
> 32:9.11.36-2.el8, but none of the providers can be installed
> - cannot install the best update candidate for package
> bind-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64
> Problem 3: package
> ipa-server-dns-4.9.8-2.module_el8.6.0+1053+0ac05726.noarch requires
> bind-dyndb-ldap >= 11.2-2, but none of the providers can be installed
> - package bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64
> requires libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> - package bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.4.0+639+a88aab78.x86_64
> requires libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and
> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64
> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and
> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-3.el8.x86_64
> - cannot install both bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 and
> bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.x86_64
> - package bind-libs-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 requires
> libdns.so.1115()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> - package bind-libs-32:9.11.36-2.el8.x86_64 requires
> bind-libs-lite(x86-64) = 32:9.11.36-2.el8, but none of the providers can be
> installed
> - cannot install the best update candidate for package
> ipa-server-dns-4.9.8-2.module_el8.6.0+1053+0ac05726.noarch
> - cannot install the best update candidate for package
> bind-libs-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64
> Problem 4: problem with installed package
> ipa-server-dns-4.9.8-2.module_el8.6.0+1053+0ac05726.noarch
> - package ipa-server-dns-4.9.8-2.module_el8.6.0+1053+0ac05726.noarch
> requires bind-dyndb-ldap >= 11.2-2, but none of the providers can be
> installed
> - package bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.5.0+750+c59b186b.x86_64
> requires libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> - package bind-dyndb-ldap-11.6-2.module_el8.4.0+639+a88aab78.x86_64
> requires libdns.so.1112()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> - package bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-6.el8.x86_64 requires bind-license =
> 32:9.11.26-6.el8, but none of the providers can be installed
> - package bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-3.el8.x86_64 requires bind-license =
> 32:9.11.26-3.el8, but none of the providers can be installed
> - package bind-libs-lite-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.x86_64 requires bind-license
> = 32:9.11.26-4.el8_4, but none of the providers can be installed
> - cannot install both bind-license-32:9.11.36-2.el8.noarch and
> bind-license-32:9.11.26-6.el8.noarch
> - cannot install both bind-license-32:9.11.36-2.el8.noarch and
> bind-license-32:9.11.26-3.el8.noarch
> - cannot install both bind-license-32:9.11.36-2.el8.noarch and
> bind-license-32:9.11.26-4.el8_4.noarch
> - cannot install the best update candidate for package
> bind-license-32:9.11.26-6.el8.noarch
> (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting
> packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to
> use not only best candidate packages)
> _______________________________________________
Fixed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051108
Caused by a rebase of bind, but the new idm:DL1 module lagged behind a
little bit. Was fixed with the push about 9 hours ago.
On 16 February 2017 at 12:02, James Hogarth <james.hogarth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16 February 2017 at 11:46, James Hogarth <james.hogarth(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 16 February 2017 at 11:35, Alice Wonder <alice(a)domblogger.net> wrote:
>>> On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 16 February 2017 at 10:42, Alice Wonder <alice(a)domblogger.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder <alice(a)domblogger.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 16 February 2017 at 09:09, Alice Wonder <alice(a)domblogger.net>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 02/16/2017 12:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In article <4cbb9dc4-f063-3434-b7a1-d4d0e6581b5e(a)domblogger.net>,
>>>>>>>>>> Alice Wonder <alice(a)domblogger.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://forum.linode.com/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=14570&p=72785
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I can not figure out what I need to do.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently according to linode support, the VM is trying to grab an
>>>>>>>>>>> IPv6
>>>>>>>>>>> address with some privacy stuff enabled by default causing it to
>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>> grab the IPv6 address that is assigned to me.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Does the accepted answer at the following link give you any useful
>>>>>>>>>> hints?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://superuser.com/questions/243669/how-to-avoid-exposing-my-mac-address-…
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>> Tony
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not really - I tried
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> net.ipv6.conf.all.use_tempaddr = 0
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> and it still fails to grab the proper IPv6
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -=-
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just in case, I did ask Linode support to verify that my hardware
>>>>>>>>> address
>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>> what it is suppose to be. Still waiting to hear on that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it still is key=value ... it uses the ifcfg- files (via the rh
>>>>>>>> plugin) and they are all key=value
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It would be helpful if you could paste the journal output (journalctl
>>>>>>>> -u NetworkManager) from the time period of attempting to get an
>>>>>>>> address ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> also the nmcli conn sh <connection_name> information for the interface
>>>>>>>> along with your ifcfg- files
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ifcfg-lo is the only one that exists on any of the servers - including
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> VMs that grab the correct IPv6 address.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> from /sbin/ifconfig -a :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For a start stop using ifconfig ... it's broken at this point on
>>>>>> linux, especially on multi ip and ipv6 scenarios
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Use `ip -6 addr sh` for ipv6 specfic stuff, or just ip addr sh to see
>>>>>> all IP address stuff regardless of family
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>>>>>>> inet 178.79.185.217 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast
>>>>>>> 178.79.185.255
>>>>>>> inet6 fe80::a8ad:d312:4ef4:7272 prefixlen 64 scopeid
>>>>>>> 0x20<link>
>>>>>>> inet6 2a01:7e00::825f:e564:ad53:72fc prefixlen 64 scopeid
>>>>>>> 0x0<global>
>>>>>>> ether f2:3c:91:18:8a:7e txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
>>>>>>> RX packets 9903 bytes 1088621 (1.0 MiB)
>>>>>>> RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
>>>>>>> TX packets 7786 bytes 1087223 (1.0 MiB)
>>>>>>> TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That hardware address - the 18:8a:7e corresponds with what the IPv6
>>>>>>> address
>>>>>>> is suppose to be. But that's not the address it is grabbing, despite
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> fact that net.ipv6.conf.all.use_tempaddr = 0 is set.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm seriously wondering if the real issue is a mis-configured dhcp
>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> their London facility because nothing makes sense.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> journalctl -u NetworkManager
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> reports no journal entries found.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So are you not using NetworkManager then? there should be some logs ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think the problem must be on their end.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It all was working fine until they migrated the VM because of a
>>>>>>> hardware
>>>>>>> issue, and I suspect now all the hardware address privacy stuff being
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> issue is barking up the wrong tree because all the reading I have done
>>>>>>> seems
>>>>>>> to indicate that with
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> net.ipv6.conf.all.use_tempaddr = 0
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that a fake temporary hardware address would not be sent to their dhcp
>>>>>>> server when obtaining the address, but the real one, that should be
>>>>>>> fetching
>>>>>>> my assigned address.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only if the kernel is doing SLAAC ... if other things (eg NM) are
>>>>>> handling it directly they may act differently ... but then from the
>>>>>> lack of logs is NM actually handling this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does systemctl status NetworkManager show it running and does nmcli
>>>>>> show anything?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> systemctl status NetworkManager
>>>>> ● NetworkManager.service - Network Manager
>>>>> Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/NetworkManager.service;
>>>>> enabled;
>>>>> vendor preset: enabled)
>>>>> Active: active (running) since Thu 2017-02-16 08:19:34 UTC; 2h 19min
>>>>> ago
>>>>>
>>>>> * more stuff *
>>>>>
>>>>> nmcli
>>>>> eth0: connected to Wired connection 1
>>>>> "Red Hat Virtio network device"
>>>>> ethernet (virtio_net), F2:3C:91:18:8A:7E, hw, mtu 1500
>>>>> ip4 default, ip6 default
>>>>> inet4 178.79.185.217/24
>>>>> route4 178.79.187.246/32
>>>>> inet6 2a01:7e00::825f:e564:ad53:72fc/64
>>>>> inet6 fe80::a8ad:d312:4ef4:7272/64
>>>>> route6 2a01:7e00::/64
>>>>>
>>>>> * more stuff for other interfaces *
>>>>>
>>>>> -=-
>>>>>
>>>>> The output of
>>>>>
>>>>> sysctl -a | grep net.ipv6 :
>>>>>
>>>>> https://librelamp.com/sysctl.txt
>>>>>
>>>>> It looks from that like it should not be hiding the real MAC address.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> do nmcli conn show "Wired connection 1"
>>>>
>>>> the entries of interest are:
>>>>
>>>> ipv6.ip6-privacy
>>>> ipv6.addr-gen-mode
>>>>
>>>> man nm-settings to get what they mean
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CentOS mailing list
>>>> CentOS(a)centos.org
>>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>>>
>>>
>>> ipv6.ip6-privacy: -1 (unknown)
>>> ipv6.addr-gen-mode: stable-privacy
>>>
>>
>>
>> Okay so from the man page:
>>
>> The permitted values are:
>> "eui64", or
>> "stable-privacy". If
>> the property is set to
>> "eui64", the addresses
>> will be generated using
>> the interface tokens
>> derived from hardware
>> address. This makes the
>> host part of the
>> address to stay
>> constant, making it
>> possible to track
>> host's presence when it
>> changes networks. The
>> address changes when
>> the interface hardware
>> is replaced. The value
>> of "stable-privacy"
>> enables use of
>> cryptographically
>> secure hash of a secret
>> host-specific key along
>> with the connection
>> identification and the
>> network address as
>> specified by RFC7217.
>> This makes it
>> impossible to use the
>> address track host's
>> presence, and makes the
>> address stable when the
>> network interface
>> hardware is replaced.
>>
>>
>> I'm not certain (would have to go get changelogs) but I suspect this
>> was a change at 7.3 with the rebase of NetworkManager
>>
>> From what you say you want it sounds like you want eui64 - the one
>> based entire on the current MAC - whereas the present version is using
>> stable-privacy to avoid tracking.
>>
>> Note that this is distinct and different to ip6-privacy which is
>> concerned about the automatic generation of temporary addresses to use
>> for outbound communication.
>
> Okay a little more research as I'm curious when it changed from EUI64
> by default ...
>
> https://blogs.gnome.org/lkundrak/2015/12/03/networkmanager-and-privacy-in-t…
>
> NM changed upstream to stable-privacy at 1.2 (the privacy extensions
> for the external connections were added at 1.0.4)
>
> RHEL 7.2 enabled privacy extensions by default:
>
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/ht…
>
> But at that milestone we had NM 1.0.6
>
> At the RHEL 7.3 release NM was rebased to 1.4.0
>
> It was briefly referenced with this change in the 7.3 release notes
> but honestly it's pretty opaque ...
>
> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/ht…
>
> "NetworkManager now supports new device types, improved stacking of
> virtual devices, LLDP, stable privacy IPv6 addresses (RFC 7217),
> detects duplicate IPv4 addresses, and controls a host name through
> systemd-hostnamed. Additionally, the user can set a DHCP timeout
> property and DNS priorities."
>
> Of course unless you knew what RFC 7217 was you'd have no idea this
> was the effect and there's no note that stable-privacy is the new
> default behaviour ARGH
>
> Disappointingly it's not listed in the "Networking" part of the
> release notes ....
>
> I think I'll raise the priority on my blog for the article I'm
> intending on the NM rebase ... there are nice things in the rebase
> like the arbitrary layering of teams, vlans and bridges but then
> there's unexpected stuff like this as well which should be made more
> visible.
>
> So ... Alice if you want to configure the system with the older EUI64
> behaviour then in your ifcfg file for that interface you need
> IPV6_ADDR_GEN_MODE=eui64 and then restart NetworkManager (or `nmcli
> conn reload` rather than a full service restart or `nmcli conn mod
> "Wired Connection 1" ipv6.addr-gen-mode eui64` to do it at the CLI
> without editing files and needing a connection reload).
Oh and last message about this ...
This was the email to fedora-devel at the time of the NM 1.2 introduction:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-November/216754.html
Systems that existed prior to the package didn't change their
configuration, it was only newly built systems that picked up the new
default - which might explain what you saw depending on how they
handled the migration.
There's a good reason that stable-privacy was moved to for automatic
addressing, but for your setup you may want to set the older eui64 to
keep things consistent.
On Oct 17, 2011 2:06 PM, "Daniel J Walsh" <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/17/2011 02:09 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> > On Oct 17, 2011 10:30 AM, "Daniel J Walsh" <dwalsh(a)redhat.com
> > <mailto:dwalsh@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >>
> > On 10/17/2011 11:19 AM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> >> Forwarding back to list. ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >> From: "Trey Dockendorf" <treydock(a)gmail.com
> >> <mailto:treydock@gmail.com>> Date: Oct 17, 2011 10:06 AM Subject:
> >> Re: [CentOS] SELinux triggered during Libvirt snapshots To:
> >> "Daniel J Walsh" <dwalsh(a)redhat.com <mailto:dwalsh@redhat.com>>
> >
> >
> >
> >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Daniel J Walsh
> >> <dwalsh(a)redhat.com <mailto:dwalsh@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/14/2011 08:17 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> >>>>> I recently began getting periodic emails from SEalert that
> >>>>> SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm "getattr"
> >>>>> access from the directory I store all my virtual machines
> >>>>> for KVM.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> All VMs are stored under /vmstore , which is it's own
> >>>>> mount point, and every file and folder under /vmstore
> >>>>> currently has the correct context that was set by doing the
> >>>>> following:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> semanage fcontext -a -t virt_image_t "/vmstore(/.*)?"
> >>>>> restorecon -R /vmstore
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So far I've noticed then when taking snapshots and also
> >>>>> when using virsh to make changes to a domain's XML file.
> >>>>> I haven't had any problems for the 3 or 4 months I've run
> >>>>> this KVM server using SELinux on Enforcing, and so I'm not
> >>>>> really sure what information is helpful to debug this. The
> >>>>> server is CentOS 6 x86_64 updated to CR. This is the raw
> >>>>> audit entry, (hostname removed)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> node=kvmhost.tld type=AVC msg=audit(1318634450.285:28):
> >>>>> avc: denied { getattr } for pid=1842 comm="qemu-kvm"
> >>>>> name="/" dev=dm-2 ino=2
> >>>>> scontext=system_u:system_r:svirt_t:s0:c772,c779
> >>>>> tcontext=system_u:object_r:fs_t:s0 tclass=filesystem
> >>>>> node=kvmhost.tld type=SYSCALL
> >>>>> msg=audit(1318634450.285:28): arch=c000003e syscall=138
> >>>>> success=no exit=-13 a0=9 a1=7fff1cf153f0 a2=0
> >>>>> a3=7fff1cf15170 items=0 ppid=1 pid=1842 auid=4294967295
> >>>>> uid=107 gid=107 euid=107 suid=107 fsuid=107 egid=107
> >>>>> sgid=107 fsgid=107 tty=(none) ses=4294967295
> >>>>> comm="qemu-kvm" exe="/usr/libexec/qemu-kvm"
> >>>>> subj=system_u:system_r:svirt_t:s0:c772,c779 key=(null)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've attached the alert email as a quote below, (hostname
> >>>>> removed)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Any help is greatly appreciated, I've had to deal little
> >>>>> with SELinux fortunately, but at the moment am not really
> >>>>> sure if my snapshots are actually functional or if this is
> >>>>> just some false positive.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks - Trey
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Summary
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm "getattr"
> >>>>>> access on /vmstore.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Detailed Description
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> SELinux denied access requested by qemu-kvm. It is not
> >>>>>> expected that this
> >>>>>>> access is required by qemu-kvm and this access may
> >>>>>>> signal an intrusion attempt. It is also possible that
> >>>>>>> the specific version or configuration of the
> >>>>>>> application is causing it to require additional
> >>>>>>> access.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Allowing Access
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You can generate a local policy module to allow this
> >>>>>> access - see FAQ
> >>>>>>> Please file a bug report.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Additional Information
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Source Context: system_u:system_r:svirt_t:s0:c772,c779
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Target Context: system_u:object_r:fs_t:s0
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Target Objects: /vmstore [ filesystem ]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Source: qemu-kvm
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Source Path: /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Port: <Unknown>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Host: kvmhost.tld
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Source RPM Packages: qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.160.el6_1.8
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Target RPM Packages:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Policy RPM: selinux-policy-3.7.19-93.el6_1.7
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Selinux Enabled: True
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Policy Type: targeted
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Enforcing Mode: Enforcing
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Plugin Name: catchall
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Host Name: kvmhost.tld
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Platform: Linux kvmhost.tld 2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.x86_64
> >>>>>> #1 SMP Mon Jun 27
> >>>>>>> 19:49:27 BST 2011 x86_64 x86_64
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Alert Count: 1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> First Seen: Fri Oct 14 18:20:50 2011
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Last Seen: Fri Oct 14 18:20:50 2011
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Local ID: c73c7440-06ee-4611-80ac-712207ef9aa6
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Line Numbers:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Raw Audit Messages :
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> node=kvmhost.tld type=AVC
> >>>>>>> msg=audit(1318634450.285:28): avc: denied { getattr }
> >>>>>>> for pid=1842 comm="qemu-kvm" name="/" dev=dm-2 ino=2
> >>>>>>> scontext=system_u:system_r:svirt_t:s0:c772,c779
> >>>>>>> tcontext=system_u:object_r:fs_t:s0 tclass=filesystem
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> node=kvmhost.tld type=SYSCALL
> >>>>>> msg=audit(1318634450.285:28): arch=c000003e
> >>>>>>> syscall=138 success=no exit=-13 a0=9 a1=7fff1cf153f0
> >>>>>>> a2=0 a3=7fff1cf15170 items=0 ppid=1 pid=1842
> >>>>>>> auid=4294967295 uid=107 gid=107 euid=107 suid=107
> >>>>>>> fsuid=107 egid=107 sgid=107 fsgid=107 tty=(none)
> >>>>>>> ses=4294967295 comm="qemu-kvm"
> >>>>>>> exe="/usr/libexec/qemu-kvm"
> >>>>>>> subj=system_u:system_r:svirt_t:s0:c772,c779 key=(null)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________ CentOS
> >>>>> mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org <mailto:CentOS@centos.org>
> >>>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> >
> >> THis is a bug in policy. It can be allowed for now.
> >
> >> We have 6.2 selinux-policy preview package available on
> >> http://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/RHEL6
> >
> >> I believe all that is happening is qemu-kvm is noticing you have
> >> a file system mounted, and doing a getattr on it.
> >
> >
> >> Thanks for the help Dan. Is there something that could have
> >> triggered this between 6.0 and 6.1? This server was updated to
> >> 6.0 CR around the same time this began happening, so I want to
> >> make sure if it's an issue in CR that I can file a useful bug
> >> report.
> >
> >> When updating selinux-policy, do I have to update all the RPMs
> >> listed or will that one package suffice?
> >
> >> Thanks - Trey _______________________________________________
> >> CentOS mailing list CentOS(a)centos.org <mailto:CentOS@centos.org>
> >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> > Did you add additional file systems?
> >
> > Not after the upgrade. The same filesystems were in place using
> > 6.0 and 6.0 CR. The only change was the upgrade to CR.
> >
> > - Trey
> >
>
> Well I have no idea. Anyways it is not a problem allowing this access.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk6cfMEACgkQrlYvE4MpobPg6wCg5YzlxAKeZ61E7EneEIkpw/A1
> lNQAn073hud5trqccs4M5QeLI3vUMnD7
> =rQB1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
What do I have to do to allow that access? Or should I update to the
selinux-policy you linked ? Ive had little in the way of experience with
selinux so this is all new.
Thanks
- Trey