[Arm-dev] What's the best support hardware model ?

[miniNodes Info]

Per my conversation with them, it is a 2U form factor, 48 nodes, with 8GB RAM and 64GB SSD  (I imagine hard drives could be swapped for larger local storage if desired).  

> To: arm-dev at centos.org
> From: arrfab at centos.org
> Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 21:24:05 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Arm-dev] What's the best support hardware model ?
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 01/12/15 19:28, miniNodes Info wrote:
> > I do see that the conversation has moved on to ARMv8, but quickly
> > to add to the 32-bit discussion...The organization that purchased
> > the Calxeda assets reached out to me recently, and they have an
> > enterprise-grade 32-bit product ready to ship.  I can share their
> > contact information if its desired (not sure of proper netiquette).
> > 
> > 
> > -David
> > 
> 
> Didn't even know that Calxeda had been acquired by another company (I
> thought they just went bankrupt)
> It would be interesting to consider if that can happen (some kind of
> armv7 1 or 2U server with some nodes and local storage)
> 
> 
> - -- 
> Fabian Arrotin
> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
> gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAlZeAeUACgkQnVkHo1a+xU7hIQCcCcvCLmSi2/RgrMnnJynoMKyA
> d7YAn0/5Ldo6QIamLEYdZ08+kLduiduM
> =udXq
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Arm-dev mailing list
> Arm-dev at centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/arm-dev/attachments/20151201/71d07e43/attachment.html>