-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 18/12/15 11:56, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > <snip> > > And I know I am going to need epel as well for the mailserver. > Most, if not all that I needed last time were noarch. A start on a > epel7-arm would be just the noarch rpms. I will try and dig out my > notes on what I was up against last year doing this. > So, Epel for CentOS AltArch will be "interesting" .. there is no epel for i686/aarch64/armhfp, and I don't think that there is a plan for that. Something to consider with some Epel folks though. If it's clear that it will never exist, we can then try to make some resources available within the CentOS Infra (or try to make it happen) to start rebuilding packages from Epel. Cheers, - -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlZz9akACgkQnVkHo1a+xU4GNACfX7dytB4z+XfsijxUCRfgBhvI 5iEAn0/VOZBD0uX2t6J97E995s34A/tp =G5EG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----