I too am a sys admin, but on that note, I've been doing a lot of docker recently. Were the plans to throw that (and the "extras") in too to see if they compile? I can always try to compile docker on a raspi as well. Arch, fedora and I think raspbian/Debian have docker in their repos, so I suspect it may work without patching, but docker being anti 32-bit, it may need it. On October 9, 2015 2:31:32 AM CDT, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >On 08/10/15 11:39, PixelDrift.NET Sam wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 05/10/15 14:15, PixelDrift.NET Sam wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have recently been working through some of the failed CentOS >>>> 7 ARM RPM builds (http://armv7.dev.centos.org/report.html) with >>>> the following successful builds: >>>> >>>> atlas (F21) >>>> http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=260230 >>>> >>>> >suitesparse (C7) gegl (C7) scipy (C7) gimp (C7) gsl (C7) bogofilter >>>> (C7) evolution (C7) evolution-ews (C7) evolution-mapi (C7) >>>> gutenprint (C7) brasero (C7 Modified BuildRequires >>>> brasero-devel) rhythmbox (C7) >>>> >>>> >>>> With atlas there appears to be a patch in the Fedora stream for >>>> the same version which fixes the armv7 build issue which >>>> appears to be blocking this package in the automated build >>>> process: * Sun Feb 16 2014 Marcin Juszkiewicz >>>> <mjuszkiewicz at redhat.com <mailto:mjuszkiewicz at redhat.com>> - >>>> 3.10.1-11 - Unbreak AArch64 build. - ARMv8 is different from >>>> ARMv7 so should not be treated as such. Otherwise atlas tries >>>> to do some crazy ARMv764 build and fail. >>>> >>>> After building atlas with the fixed package I was able to >>>> proceed building the other listed packages with their original >>>> C7 srpms. >>>> >>>> Can someone advise on the process for getting the patch from >>>> the Fedora package into C7? >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance. >>>> >>>> -Sam >>>> >>> >>> Well, actually sending the patch (for the .spec and also the >>> patch to be added -if any- as Source) to this list would be >>> welcome. I know that we tried to have it working with the >>> following patch already : >>> >http://armv7.dev.centos.org/repodir/c7-buildroot-patched-SRPMS/patches/atlas-spec.patch >>> >>> >Not sure if that's the patch used by Fedora, would be good to compare. >>> Let's try to close that, and then release CentOS 7 for arm32, >>> then building all pending updates too. :-) >>> >> >> Thanks Fabian, >> >> The patch looks to be one and the same. >> >> I downloaded the srpm with the patch applied from here >> >(http://armv7.dev.centos.org/repodir/c7-buildroot-patched-SRPMS/atlas-3.10.1-7.el7.centos.0.1.src.rpm) >> >> >and it built cleanly on my armv7 hardware (ODROID XU4). >> >> Is there a build log from the build servers for this patched >> version? > >All the build logs are public (and even previous version). >For example , here is the build log for altlas : >http://armv7.dev.centos.org/rpmbuild/c7-pass-1-previous-buildlogs/6695-atlas-3.10.1-7.el7.centos.0.1/armv7hl/build.log > >As I'm a sysadmin (read "not a devel guy") and so that infra has >priority #1 for me, I never had a chance to investigate why that one >was failing, nor even tried another time. (I just requeued it though, >let's see) >I don't know if underlying hardware used for the build could make a >diff. > >The four armv7hl nodes we're actually using have : >cpu model name : ARMv7 Processor rev 2 (v7l) >Hardware : Marvell Armada 370/XP (Device Tree) >Revision : 0000 > >Those are actually running Fedora 21 with mock-1.1.41-3.fc21.noarch >The idea would be to switch that to c7 as soon as possible too, and >I'm pretty sure that we're close to that, if other people join the >"party" > >- -- >Fabian Arrotin >The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org >gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) > >iEYEARECAAYFAlYXbVQACgkQnVkHo1a+xU6ypQCffF/+hNlYUPU9FdxAMZhVD2pq >9nsAniAAsRi4KkOsznrB0bY9hPSrquLO >=ITz6 >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >_______________________________________________ >Arm-dev mailing list >Arm-dev at centos.org >https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/arm-dev/attachments/20151009/7a1fc4f2/attachment-0006.html>