[Arm-dev] Kernel for BananaPi R1 (Lamobo R1)

Sat Feb 27 10:13:32 UTC 2016
mo.ucina <mo.ucina at gmail.com>

Hello Fabian,

My compilation of the kernel 4.4.2-300 , with the patch went fine . Here 
is my package list :

user at home1 /home/user/Downloads/ARM_Centos/RPMS $ ls -l
total 127920
-rw-rw-r-- 1 user user    49288 Feb 27 20:06 
kernel-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl.rpm
-rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 87721962 Feb 27 20:06 
kernel-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.src.rpm
-rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 18781728 Feb 27 20:07 
kernel-core-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl.rpm
-rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 10420020 Feb 27 20:08 
kernel-devel-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl.rpm
-rw-rw-r-- 1 user user  1012436 Feb 27 20:06 
kernel-headers-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl.rpm
-rw-rw-r-- 1 user user 11841384 Feb 27 20:09 
kernel-modules-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl.rpm
-rw-rw-r-- 1 user user   925624 Feb 27 20:09 
kernel-modules-extra-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl.rpm
-rw-rw-r-- 1 user user   105420 Feb 27 20:06 
kernel-tools-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl.rpm
-rw-rw-r-- 1 user user    65348 Feb 27 20:06 
kernel-tools-libs-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl.rpm
-rw-rw-r-- 1 user user    52120 Feb 27 20:06 
kernel-tools-libs-devel-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl.rpm


I have given it %define buildid .LR1 in the spec , so that I can tell my 
kernels apart from the originals .
However when it came to the installation , I am finding that there must 
be more steps involved . After
installation in my /boot directory I have :

root at bananapi /boot # ls -l
total 43611
drwxr-xr-x. 5 root root     1024 Feb 27 09:17 
38f5ec9e217b471e8adee477d933f640
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root   171924 Nov 26 00:43 config-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root    15360 Dec  3 14:37 dtb-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root     1024 Dec  3 14:47 extlinux
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root     1024 Jan  1  1970 grub
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 34922581 Dec  3 14:46 
initramfs-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl.img
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root   592347 Dec  3 14:37 initrd-plymouth.img
drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root     1024 Dec  3 14:44 loader
drwx------. 2 root root    12288 Dec  3 14:31 lost+found
-rw-------. 1 root root  2879429 Nov 26 00:43 
System.map-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root  5866104 Nov 26 00:43 vmlinuz-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl

Then I did the command :
dracut /boot/initramfs-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl.img 
4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl

which created just the  initramfs-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl.img file . 
Now I have :

root at bananapi /boot # ls -l
total 78753
drwxr-xr-x. 5 root root     1024 Feb 27 09:17 
38f5ec9e217b471e8adee477d933f640
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root   171924 Nov 26 00:43 config-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root    15360 Dec  3 14:37 dtb-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root     1024 Dec  3 14:47 extlinux
drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root     1024 Jan  1  1970 grub
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 34922581 Dec  3 14:46 
initramfs-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl.img
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 35842525 Feb 27 09:30 
initramfs-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl.img
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root   592347 Dec  3 14:37 initrd-plymouth.img
drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root     1024 Dec  3 14:44 loader
drwx------. 2 root root    12288 Dec  3 14:31 lost+found
-rw-------. 1 root root  2879429 Nov 26 00:43 
System.map-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root  5866104 Nov 26 00:43 vmlinuz-4.2.3-200.el7.armv7hl

Then I edited the extlinux.conf , and changed the references to the 
kernel/initrd , followed by systemctl reboot .
However the board did not boot . I am sure it is because I am missing :
config-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl
dtb-4.4.2-300.el7.LR1.armv7hl
System.map-4.4.2-300.LR1.el7.armv7hl
vmlinuz-4.4.2-300.el7.LR1.armv7hl

My question is how are those files created, and where (which package ) 
do they come from . Because I need to create them manually .

By the way , I am attaching the switch patch . To me it looks GPL , or 
GPL like , so I think it should be fine . To answer your question why Fedora
has not used it? My guess the expectation would be that someone needs to 
have it submitted up stream to Linus T, before it can be considered .

Best Regards
Milorad

PS Patch is latest pull done today . And it has been zipped up . So if 
file extension is not zip , just rename it to zip , and should extract 
fine .











-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: linux-4.4.2-1.fc21.armv7hl.LR1.patch.zip
Type: application/zip
Size: 31244 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/arm-dev/attachments/20160227/a457c9e7/attachment-0005.zip>