On 10 March 2016 at 14:01, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> wrote: > On 10/03/16 21:13, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> Hi my name is Stephen Smoogen, and I am joining the CentOS ARM group >> to help on getting EPEL packages ported to this version of the OS. >> >> I have worked in CentOS back in the EL-5 days doing some QA and other >> work as needed. I am currently working in Fedora Project in the >> infrastructure group with a primary interest in EPEL. >> >> I will be ordering a RaspPi 2 (or 3 if that is what I get) to do the >> testing on. I will also be working on any build issues that I can. >> > > Hi Smooge, > > Nice to see you on the list ;-) > One thing that would be good to know is if having "upstream" epel build > (so at the Fedora builders level) for AltArch (like armhfp/aarch64) is > still an option, and if so when would that be possible. In the meantime, > we can try to rebuild/bootstrap something on our side (and I started > that last week for pkgs having a high demand) and report that at the > Epel level too. > More than happy to give you plague-client access to the plague build > farm for that centralized build effort > OK at this point I don't think we will be able to get i386 or arm32 into the main EPEL builders due to Fedora 24 readiness issues needing more effort in koji than secondary split-brain architectures. So instead I would like to look at a branch of centos via plague builders and using a snapshot status versus live update status. We can work out how they are to be mirrored etc from there. > -- > Fabian Arrotin > The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org > gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab > > > _______________________________________________ > Arm-dev mailing list > Arm-dev at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/arm-dev > -- Stephen J Smoogen.