On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Gordan Bobic <gordan at redsleeve.org> wrote: > On 2016-09-18 18:55, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >>> >>> I want to buy a few small ARMv8 boards to run CentOS on. Seems like a >>> reasonable idea to offload simple services onto simple boards. Is this page >>> still accurate? >>> https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AltArch/AArch64 >>> >> >> There are four small ARMv8 dev-boards I am aware. I have all of them >> for testing software. They are: >> >> * LeMaker HiKey (Aarch64, ASIMD, CRC, Crypto) >> * Pine64 (Aarch64, ASIMD, CRC, Crypto) >> * ODROID-C2 (Aarch64, ASIMD, CRC) >> * Raspberry Pi-3 (Armhf (not even Aarch32)) > > Wait - what's aarch32? 32-bit execution state on 64-bit ARM processors. A32 instruction set, trust zones, supervisor mode, new ABI/procedure calling conventions (APCS), etc. Frame pointers and layout are completely different. Also see https://community.arm.com/docs/DOC-8453 . I tired to do a post-mortem on the RPI3 after enabling ARMv8 for the CRC. It was an exercise in futility. Also see "Recover frame pointer for broken back trace?", http://stackoverflow.com/q/38798592 . Jeff