Hi guys, A trend I see either on twitter, or irc, or elsewhere is a complaint about Epel not available for CentOS 7 userland on armhfp. It's of course technically true (as there is nothing listed on the Epel wiki page itself) but we covered that FAQ in our wiki : https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AltArch/Arm32#head-f2a772703b3caa90cc284e01bc87423ce9a87bcd Unfortunately, it seems that people never read that wiki page. So I was just wondering if we could have our epel rebuild effort (https://armv7.dev.centos.org/repodir/epel-pass-1/) available directly for our armhfp users, without having them to do anything special. Now I'm wondering if we should just create a .repo (and coming from centos-userland-release) but have it disabled by default (imho) or even enable it by default (-1 on my side) Also, we should probably just rename it to something else than 'Epel' as we can't call that epel : it's a rebuild from Epel SRPMs but it's not Epel Opinions, Thoughts ? please make hear your voice ! PS : also trying to make some noise on twitter to bring back users not subscribed to the arm-dev list, or not hanging around in #centos-arm on irc.freenode.net -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/arm-dev/attachments/20170729/c3002d42/attachment-0005.sig>