It is wonderful to hear that there is an official AArch64 EPEL. What about the amrv7nl EPEL status? thanks On 05/11/2017 09:42 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: > > On 05/11/2017 11:00 PM, Richard Henwood wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> A colleague pointed me at: https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/aarch64/ >> >> This looks to me like EPEL, but I'm not sure this is an official >> _CentOS_ EPEL; And I'm not sure I understand if there is a difference >> anyway... >> >> Can someone advise if this is the CentOS EPEL for AArch64 - or what the >> status of AArch64 EPEL is for CentOS? >> > This is the correct EPEL to use. EPEL has always been provided by the > Fedora Project for use with CentOS and other 'Enterprise Linux' builds. > > There was a period where we saw demand for EPEL packages on aarch64, but > fedora was not yet tooled to build them. We maintained an unofficial and > unsigned repository (mentioned in another reply) briefly until the real > EPEL repository was available. > > Please use the repository you found for EPEL, as the unofficial one > hosted on buildlogs.centos is no longer maintained. > > > >