On 12/05/17 20:43, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > It is wonderful to hear that there is an official AArch64 EPEL. > > What about the amrv7nl EPEL status? > > thanks > Last time it was discussed with Fedora/Epel folks, the issue is that Epel is building against RHEL, and that there is no RHEL 7 armhfp release (and that will never happen) So for the time being, the only option is the one described on the wiki (https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AltArch/Arm32?highlight=%28arm32%29#head-f2a772703b3caa90cc284e01bc87423ce9a87bcd) and so use that "unofficial" repo -- Fabian Arrotin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/arm-dev/attachments/20170513/ac3fe988/attachment-0006.sig>