[Arm-dev] Why RPi3 under Arm32 rather than AArch64?
Jim Perrin
jperrin at centos.orgMon Jan 8 18:54:33 UTC 2018
- Previous message: [Arm-dev] Why RPi3 under Arm32 rather than AArch64?
- Next message: [Arm-dev] Why RPi3 under Arm32 rather than AArch64?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 01/04/2018 02:30 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote: > Things required to "support" Pi3 aarch64 that aren't already in place in > core CentOS (or at least I haven't managed to find them): > > 1) Pi3 firmware blobs > Trivially downloadable from > https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware/tree/master/boot > Keep in mind, we also need to be able to redistribute this if we're building images. It's not just a matter of getting it. Not saying yes or no, just that it's another thing we have to look at as we do this. -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
- Previous message: [Arm-dev] Why RPi3 under Arm32 rather than AArch64?
- Next message: [Arm-dev] Why RPi3 under Arm32 rather than AArch64?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Arm-dev mailing list