[Arm-dev] Why RPi3 under Arm32 rather than AArch64?

There is a LICENCE.broadcom file in there with the redistribution
permission details, but it looked reasonable to my non-lawyer eyes.


On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 6:54 PM, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote:

>
>
> On 01/04/2018 02:30 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> > Things required to "support" Pi3 aarch64 that aren't already in place in
> > core CentOS (or at least I haven't managed to find them):
> >
> > 1) Pi3 firmware blobs
> > Trivially downloadable from
> > https://github.com/raspberrypi/firmware/tree/master/boot
> >
>
> Keep in mind, we also need to be able to redistribute this if we're
> building images. It's not just a matter of getting it. Not saying yes or
> no, just that it's another thing we have to look at as we do this.
>
> --
> Jim Perrin
> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
> twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/arm-dev/attachments/20180108/7be5c23c/attachment-0002.html>