[CentOS-devel] CentOS CS & GFS packages
mailing-lists at hughesjr.com
Thu Jul 21 19:23:14 UTC 2005
On Thu, July 21, 2005 10:02 am, seth vidal said:
> On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 10:58 -0400, Charlie Brady wrote:
>> On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Tru Huynh wrote:
>> > The main issue I see is the QA test: how do we compare
>> > the CentOS binary rpms against the genuine ones?
>> Why do you want to? I'm not aware of any such comparisons with all the
>> other RHEL binaries.
>> Are CentOS binaries not also "genuine"?
> to make sure the buildreqs were satisfied and the build environments
> were sane.
If you build a package with certian things installed, it links to certian
programs, if you build it with more or less things installed than RH did,
it can have extra (or not enough) links.
They are both "genuine" and they both work ... but they are different. We
don't want to be different, so we will adjust the build environemnt and
build it again in these cases after a comparison.
More information about the CentOS-devel