Lance Davis wrote: > > The name appended is the upstream provider. Therefor it is not IBM's > > java and not BEA's java and certainly not CentOS's java. It is SUN's > java > > :) > > > > So yes, like Rex suggested, it should have appended 'sun' not 'centos' > > Then maybe we need to call it -sun.centos or something CentOS should probably name it what you'd guess RedHat would name it if they packaged it for RHEL4. I think "java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.06-1.centos" is the way to go. That's similar to the naming of the IBM java rpm's on the RHEL4 Extras CD. Greg