Greg Swallow - SkyNet wrote: > Lance Davis wrote: >> > The name appended is the upstream provider. Therefor it is not IBM's >> > java and not BEA's java and certainly not CentOS's java. It is SUN's >> java >> > :) >> > >> > So yes, like Rex suggested, it should have appended 'sun' not 'centos' >> >> Then maybe we need to call it -sun.centos or something > > CentOS should probably name it what you'd guess RedHat would name it if > they > packaged it for RHEL4. I think "java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.06-1.centos" is the > way to go. That's similar to the naming of the IBM java rpm's on the > RHEL4 Extras CD. agreed, much better. -- Rex