Milan Keršláger wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:06:36PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > Oh come on. Not that again. That has all been explained in *detail* in > > <http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1402>, where you couldn't explain > > either on where to obtain the gcc the kernel has been compiled with by > > the upstream vendor. > > The SRC packages are available from Beta channel from RHN. There is a > person from your team who exacly know the version. So grab the SRC > package and rebuild. Oh, you mean that beta channel where 3.4.6-3 was available, which wasn't the gcc version either upstream built their kernel rpm with (3.4.6-2)? And now take that foot out of your mouth, it really makes you look funny. Regards, Ralph -- Ralph Angenendt......ra at br-online.de | .."Text processing has made it possible Bayerischer Rundfunk...80300 München | ....to right-justify any idea, even one Programmbereich.Bayern 3, Jugend und | .which cannot be justified on any other Multimedia.........Tl:089.5900.16023 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20060823/d6af75a9/attachment-0007.sig>