On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:45:17PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > Milan Keršláger wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:06:36PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > > Oh come on. Not that again. That has all been explained in *detail* in > > > <http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1402>, where you couldn't explain > > > either on where to obtain the gcc the kernel has been compiled with by > > > the upstream vendor. > > > > The SRC packages are available from Beta channel from RHN. There is a > > person from your team who exacly know the version. So grab the SRC > > package and rebuild. > > Oh, you mean that beta channel where 3.4.6-3 was available, which wasn't > the gcc version either upstream built their kernel rpm with (3.4.6-2)? -3 has 4 bug more fixed. You never will have 3.4.6-2 even after release in U4. So where is the problem? Do you want to build with compiler with 4 more bug fixed or with 5 or 6 more? > And now take that foot out of your mouth, it really makes you look > funny. And you too. Rules only for some people. Really funny. I was asking to build non-crashing kernel only. Instead of fix I've got angry people trying to push me out. Really not funny end. -- Milan Kerslager E-mail: milan.kerslager at pslib.cz WWW: http://www.pslib.cz/ke/