[CentOS-devel] CentOS-4.4 yumconf

Fri Oct 13 13:29:22 UTC 2006
Roger Peña Escobio <orkcu at yahoo.com>

> > Please do consider more discussions on issues such
> as the yumconf
> > approach on this list.
> yes, we know that we should have made a bit of noise
> about this yumconf 
> issue before it went out into the wild. I think
> we've all learn't a 
> lesson here.

I am gad you agree-accept that the core developers
learn a lesson :-), I was a litle sad because I could
not see any positive reaction to all our complains and
ideas to get both side happy (just one srpm to give
two packages)

I can understand also that you make such a public
change just when another developer speak :-)
maybe is an effect of "not everybody's words have the
same weight". I personally agree with that way of
thinking but I beleave if there was one thing that
drive people from whitebox to centos at the begining
was the strong decision control over the whitebox
project that Jonh had and don't want to give away,
Centos promise the opposite. It will be sad that that
promise just demise over time (across consolidation of
the project)

please, I know that my words are one of the less
weighted :-) because I just use and make promotion of
the CentOS project (not big deal) but maybe other
peoples has the same impresion....

PD: please accept my appologies for my bag english :-)

RedHat Certified Engineer ( RHCE )
Cisco Certified Network Associate ( CCNA )

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around