Ron Yorston wrote: > > We've been using CentOS' yum on RHEL in conjunction with an empty RPM > that provides yumconf. Having centos-release provide yumconf seems to > complicate this without giving any particular advantage. the advantage is better management ability on CentOS >> I see this as an interoperability issue, and it should be discussed a >> bit. I'm not convinced that a yumconf package is the way to go, but >> providing the files in centos-release doesn't seem to be the right way >> either. Other opinions? > > I'd be happy to revert having a separate yumconf package, unless anyone > has a better solution. > use your own yum-conf.rpm that also provides a centos-release ! -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq